dcsimg

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)
Figs. 74, 87, 100, 129, 143, 158-159, 268-277, 327, 357, 389, 421, 453, 501-503, 537
Noctua litura Fabricius 1775: 601; Aurivillius 1897: 162.
Noctua histrionica Fabricius 1775: 612.
Noctua elata Fabricius 1781: 220.
Prodenia tasmanica Guenee in Boisduval & Guenee
1852a: 163; Walker 1856: 198. Prodenia ciligera Guenee in Boisduval & Guenee 1852a:
164; Walker 1856: 196. Prodenia subterminalis Walker 1856: 196. Prodenia glaucistriga Walker 1856: 197 Prodenia declinata Walker 1857b: 723. Mamestra albisparsa Walker 1862: 186. Prodenia evanescens Butler 1884: 94. Prodenia litura; Chen et al. 1991: 230; Warren in Seitz
1914b: 320. Spodoptera litura; Viette 1963: 147; Holloway 1976: 12;
Barlow 1982: 86; Sugi 1982: 764; Goater 1983: 278;
Holloway 1989: 136; Poole 1989: 924; Edwards 1996:
324; Kononenko et al. 1998: 233.
Diagnosis. — Color and pattern almost indistinguishable from S. Httoralis. Hindwing of S. litura with apices of veins brown. Male genitalia with juxta triangulate; base of ampulla narrower, than in S. Httoralis (compare Figs. 356 and 357); dorsal lobes of coremata almost as long as ventral lobes
ventral plate of ostium bursa a broad V-shaped notch (Fig. 453); ductus bursae longer than S. Httoralis (compare Figs. 420 and 421).
Description. Adult Male. — Head: Basal segment of labial palpus cream with median patch variably mixed with black and rufous scales; median segment cream with black median band
variably mixed with rufous scales; apical segment black, apex cream. Frons with short scales cream; long scales brown and cream; lateral spots at eye margin brown to black; vertex cream and brown. Antenna filiform; scape cream and brown; flagellum cream and brown.
Thorax: Patagium light brown to brown flecked with black, median transverse band white, apical margin white. Tegula light brown and white (black scales at caudomedial apex). Mesothorax light brown. Underside of thorax white. Prothoracic femur fuscous and cream; tibia with lateral scale tufts not extending beyond first tarsal segment, cream (can have fuscous scales present), subapical spot black; tarsal segments cream. Mesothoracic femur cream (mediolateral subapical patch fuscous); tibia fuscous and cream, inner spur more than twice length of outer spur, mediolateral surface broadly devoid of scales on both spurs; tarsal segments 1^ fuscous with cream apical rings, segment 5 cream. Metathoracic femur cream and rufous; tibia cream and rufous; tarsal segments 1—4 cream with bases fuscous, segment 5 cream.
Forezving: Length, 14-17 mm; ground color brown; basal line absent; longitudinal black dash at base absent; R vein from base to reniform spot gray; basal triangular scale patch between R and Cu veins brown bordered by white; basal half circle scale patch below Cu vein light brown bordered by black; antemedial line black, indistinct; claviform spot absent; basal scale patch gray from costa to posterior margin (indistinct above Cu vein); gray patch covering anal cell and half of cell CuA2 absent; oblique brown mark from fifth outer marginal spot to vein CuA2 absent; curved white line from antemedial line to postmedial line absent; orbicular spot an oblique trapezoid, cream, with a light brown center bordered by light brown to black; reniform spot brown outlined in white on proximal border, distal apex is a triangular light brown spot outlined in white, a white distal border extending to middle; white scales along Cu vein from orbicular spot to junction of veins M3 and CuAl which extend down veins M3, CuAl, and CuA2 to postmedial line; postmedial line indistinct, black variably bordered by white from middle to posterior margin; postmedian band pale gray and with an elliptical brown spot along subterminal line; black scale patches in middle of cells M2 to CuAl in postmedian area; subterminal line a light brown band
bordered by white; apex with a few white scales, no distinct patch; dark gray spindle-shaped spots along outer margin; fringe gray. Underside ground color pale gray; outer margin with black crescent-shaped spots; reniform spot gray.
Hindiving: Ground color white; apex, outer margin, and veins with light brown scales; fringe white. Underside ground color white; costal cells C and Sc cream speckled with rufous and gray scales; outer margin with a few faint gray spots in middle of cells Sc to CuAl; no spot on underside.
Abdomen: Dorsum pale gray to gray; venter cream (rufous scales can be present); disto-lateral black spots on sternites absent (can have a few remnant scales on some specimens); 8th tergite with spiculate patches present on caudal margin.
Genitalia: Uncus curved in apical half; slender, gradually narrowing toward pointed apex; setae absent or few. Scaphium elongate, weakly developed. Tegumen lacking a pair of projecting arms on upper third. Costa slightly bent at middle
at base of costa on inner edge; perpendicular to costa of valve. Cucullus apex truncate; not produced. Anellifer with lightly sclerotized plate bearing setae present. Ampulla elongate, slightly curved with a decurved apex; extending to just below apex of valve (Figs. 327, 357). Clasper proper absent. Clavus a minute round projection. Sacculus widest at one-fourth its length, tapering distally; apex truncate. Valvula wider than valve; well differentiated from valve, apex free; apex truncate; indentation large, ventral margin round. Coremata elongate, more than 0.5 length of valve; in form of a double lobe. Juxta a narrow rectangular band, median process narrow at base and elongate, ventral margin narrowly concave. Anellus membranous. Vinculum U-shaped with parallel arms and a robust base. Aedoeagus straight; coecum smaller in diameter than shaft; patch of spines absent on apex of membranous sheath surrounding aedoeagus. Vesica curving ventrally; short, less than 0.75 length of aedoeagus; apicobasal cornutal patch a wide ribbon; length moderate, extending to before middle of vesica; cornuti in form of minute flat granules; lateral cornutal patch an elongate elliptical area; a mixture of small spines distally and large spines apically; dense cornutal patch subapical on vesica; distal cornutus a bulbous elliptical plate, apex pointed.
Adult Female. — Essentially as described for male except:
Forewing: Length, 15-18 mm. Longitudinal black dash at base absent; basal scale patch small, gray, from midway between M and anal veins to anal vein; gray patch covering anal cell and half of cell CuA2 absent; orbicular spot an oblique trapezoid, cream, with a gray center, bordered by thin black line distally; reniform spot more gray with a light brown to gray apical spot outlined in white; postmedian band less distinct and tends to be more brown; black scale patches in middle of cells R4 to CuA2, patch in R4 basal to other patches, patch in R5 consisting of only a few scales in postmedian area.
Abdomen: Fine dense scales on 8th segment cream.
Genitalia: Ventral plate of ostium bursa with height greater than width; distal margin with a broad V-shaped notch; ventrolateral invaginated pocket of 8th sternite absent. Ductus bursae elongate (length greater than 3 times width); completely sclerotized. Appendix bursae membranous. Corpus bursae bulbous, length less than twice width; striate convolutions. Signum in apical half of corpus bursae; short, length less than 0.65 mm; almost vertical.
Larva. — See description, p. 111.
Type material. — Noctua litura Fabricius. The type is presumed lost (Zimsen 1964). The neotype 8 [USNM, here designated] is labeled: Indien WB 1800m; Darjeeling Mangpu-road; ll-VII-1986; leg. W. Thomas. SPOD 0360. The neotype is designated and labeled to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species and is illustrated in Fig. 269. Type locality: Darjeeling Mangpu road, India.
Noctua histrionica Fabricius. The type is presumed lost (Zimsen 1964). Type locality: India.
Noctua elata Fabricius. The type is presumed lost (Zimsen 1964). Type locality: Tranquebariae, India.
Prodenia tasmanica Guenee. The type repository is unknown. Type locality: Tasmania, Australia.
Prodenia ciligera Guenee. The lectotype 8 [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: [No locality label] 60.15, EIC; Prod, ciligera; Noc. gen. Slide No. 3497 8. The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species and is illustrated in Fig. 274. Type locality: Java, Indonesia. The following syntype becomes a paralectotype: Label data: 60.15, EIC; Prod, ciligera.
Prodenia subterminalis Walker. The lectotype 9 [BMNH] is labeled: Lectotype, Punjab, Hearsay,
54-74; Noc. gen. Slide No. 3498 ?. Walker (1856: 196) described subterminalis from two specimens of unknown sex, one from Punjab, and the other from Northern] India. Hampson (1909: 247) listed "1 9 type subterminlais" from his list of specimens from Punjab. This can be inferred as a lectotype designation and this specimen is the one mentioned above and is illustrated in Fig. 277.
Prodenia glaucistriga Walker. The lectotype 8 [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: N. India, Noc. gen. Slide No. 3486 8 . The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species and is illustrated in Fig. 276. Type locality: N. India. The following syntype becomes a paralectotype: 8 , Label data: Canara, S. N. Ward, 50-26.
Prodenia declinata Walker. The holotype 8 (Fig. 273) [BMNH] is labeled: Holotype, N. India, 4310; Noc. gen. Slide No. 3499 8 . Type locality: N. India.
Mamestra albisparsa Walker. The type(s) are deposited in University Museum, Oxford University, Oxford. Type locality: Borneo, Sarawak, Indonesia.
Prodenia evanescens Butler. The lectotype 9 [BMNH, here designated] is labeled: S. Pacific, Caroline Is., E. G. Holden, 84-2; Prodenia, evanescens, type Butler; Noc. gen. Slide No. 3500 9 . The lectotype is designated to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species and is illustrated in Fig. 275. Type locality: Caroline Is., Federated States of Micronesia. The following syntype becomes a paralectotype: Label data: S. Pacific, Caroline Is., E. G. Holden, 84-2; Caroline Isl., 84-2.
Material Examined. — Specimens were examined from the following countries: American Samoa, Australia, Burma, China, Chirstmas Island, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kiribati, Line Islands, Malaysia, Maldive Islands, Marshall Islands, Nepal, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Northern Marianas, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Pitcairn Island, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Tonga, United States (Hawaii), Vanuatu, Western Samoa.
Distribution (Fig. 537). — Spodoptera litura is distributed further east than S. littoralis. Care must be taken when examining specimens from western Asia as S. litura reaches Afghanistan, northwestern India, and Pakistan. From western
Asia, S. litura ranges eastward to Korea, China, and Japan, southward throughout the Australasian area, and is widely distributed across the Pacific to Hawaii.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Pogue, M.G. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 20. Philadelphia, USA

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)
Figs. 158-159, 501-503
Diagnosis. — Spodoptera litura can be differentiated from S. mauritia by the serrate edge of the mandible in S. litura. This species can be separated from S. exigua because S. litura has dorsolateral marks on the mesoand metathorax, a smaller number of crochets on the prolegs, and the ratio of the ecdysial line versus frons height averages between 0.63-0.84.
Description of preserved specimens. — Head: Color brown; reticulate; frons brown; cutting edge of mandible serrate; P2 setae farther apart than PI setae; ratio ecdysial line: frons height, averages between 0.63-0.84. Thorax: Pronotum with dorsolateral stripe conspicuous, either solid or consisting of closely spaced spots and dashes; middorsal stripe subequal to dorsolateral stripe. Mesothorax segmental spot semicircular to rectangular; with lateral dark spot present. Metathorax with segmental spot semicircular; white spot at base of segmental spot; lateral dark spot present. Abdomen: Body smooth; setal pinacula minute. Middorsal stripe inconspicuous, narrower than dorsolateral stripe. Segmental spots on abdominal segments 7 and 8 larger than on 1-6 (variable, can be almost uniform in size on some specimens); wide on segments 1-6, almost extending to middorsal stripe (can be faint); with a distinct white spot near apex; spot on 8th abdominal segment larger than on mesothorax. Segment 1 with lateral dark spot present. Segments 2-6 with lateral dark spots in spiracular band present. Spiracular band reticulate; segments 1-6 in spiracular band with white or light colored spot caudal to spiracle present. Spiracles with black border and brown center; not stalked. Subspiracular stripe continuous through abdominal segment 1. Crochets uniordinal; total number on one side of body greater than 107 (range: 116-141; average: 127.3; n=10).
Color description. — Head dark brown to black, pale brown on vertex and with pale marks laterally; frons dark brown to black; adfrons white. Pronotal shield black with pale speckling. Ground color dark grayish to blackish with pale speckling. Middorsal stripe yellow. Segmental spots black. Dorsolateral stripe yellow. Subspiracular stripe dull yellow. Spiracles black. Venter dull green. Thoracic legs black. Proleg shields black (Fletcher 1914; Gardner 1941).
Plant hosts. — Spodoptera litura is the most polyphagous species of Spodoptera with 151 species in 51 families of recorded host plants. Like S. Httoralis, this species is not confined to a few families, and both have similar hosts plants. Agriculturally important crops attacked include cotton, rice, green gram, corn, cabbage, beet, peanut, soybean, castor oil plant, tomato, and tobacco.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Pogue, M.G. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 20. Philadelphia, USA

Spodoptera litura

provided by wikipedia EN

Spodoptera litura, otherwise known as the tobacco cutworm or cotton leafworm, is a nocturnal moth in the family Noctuidae. S. litura is a serious polyphagous pest in Asia, Oceania, and the Indian subcontinent that was first described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1775.[1] Its common names reference two of the most frequent host plants of the moth. In total, 87 species of host plants that are infested by S. litura are of economic importance.[2] The species parasitize the plants through the larvae vigorous eating patterns, oftentimes leaving the leaves completely destroyed. The moth's effects are quite disastrous, destroying economically important agricultural crops and decreasing yield in some plants completely.[3] Their potential impact on the many different cultivated crops, and subsequently the local agricultural economy, has led to serious efforts to control the pests.[4]

S. litura is often confused with its close relative, Spodoptera littoralis. These two species are hard to discriminate between because the larvae and adult forms are identical. Inspecting the genitalia is the most certain way to tell the two species apart.[5]

Description

Sex differences

Morphology

There are slight but obvious differences in morphology between males and females of S. litura that allow for the easy differentiation of the two sexes. Male forewing length is 14–17 millimetres (1258 in) while female forewing length is slightly larger and measures 15–18 millimetres (5834 in). The orbicular spot on the forewing is also more pronounced in the males.[6]

Differences in food regulation

Regulation of macro nutrient input differs between males and females. Experimental results show that when S. litura are presented with two nutritionally complementary diet options, one rich in protein and a second rich in carbohydrates, females tend to consume more protein than males while no differences in carbohydrates exist. Body utilization of the macro nutrients differed as well. Females were very efficient at converting the protein consumed into body growth and mass, reflecting the bodily requirements to produce eggs. Males, on the other hand, were more efficient at depositing lipid from ingested carbohydrates. This fits in well with the migration patterns associated with mating. Males usually go out to find females during mating season, so the lipid deposits are thought to be energy reserves that will help the males in preparation for the migration.[7]

Similar species

Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera littoralis are very closely related species. Discriminating between the two species can be difficult because the larvae and adult forms look identical. In fact, these two species are so similar that previous records that have claimed the presence of S. litura in areas such as Russia, Germany, and the UK may actually have been referring to S. littoralis.[5] Since both species are polyphagous, taking note of the host plant is not helpful in correct identification.[8] The only way to properly differentiate between the two is by inspecting their genitalia. In S. littoralis, the ductus and ostium bursae are the same lengths while in S. litura, they are of different lengths. In males, the juxta have characteristic shapes for each species.[5]

Range

S. litura is the most common in South Asia.[9] However, its natural range extends from the Oriental and Australasian areas to parts of the Palearctic region as well.[6] The countries with the most widespread population of S. litura include but are not limited to China, Indonesia, India, Japan, and Malaysia.[2] The range of S. litura has also extended into non-indigenous regions through international trade. Moths in their egg, larvae, or pupae stages can be present in the soil, flower, or vegetation that are being transported across various regions. Pupae especially can be moved long distances, provided that they are not crushed, because of the relatively long pupation period.[5]

Habitat

S. litura is a general herbivore and takes residence on various plants.[10] The lower and upper limits of habitable temperatures are 10 and 37 °C (50 and 99 °F), respectively. Therefore, it is well suited for tropical and temperate climate regions.[5] As caterpillars, S. litura can only move short distances. However, adult moths can fly up to a distance of 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi) for a total duration of 4 hours. This helps disperse the moths into new habitats and onto different host plants as food sources are depleted.[5]

Life cycle

A page of a 1957 brochure of US Department of Agriculture on controlling tobacco cutworms, with a photograph of its eggs
1957 USDA brochure
Emerging larvae
Larva

Although the length of a life cycle varies slightly throughout the different regions, a typical S. litura will complete 12 generations every year. Each generation lasts about a month, but temperature causes slight variations: life cycles in the winter tend to be slightly more than one month, and life cycles in the summer tend to be less than a full month.[5]

Egg

Eggs are spherical and slightly flattened. Each individual egg is around 0.6 mm in diameter with an orange-brown or pink color. These eggs are laid on the surface of leaves in big batches, with each cluster usually containing several hundred eggs. Females have a typical fecundity of 2000 to 2600 eggs.[5] However, experiments have shown that high temperatures and low humidity are inversely related to fecundity.[2] When laid, the egg batches are covered with hair scales provided by the female, which gives off a golden brown color. Egg masses are 4–7 millimetres (53235128 in) in total diameter, and eggs will hatch 2–3 days after being laid.[5]

Eggs

Larva

Larvae body length ranges from 2.3 millimetres (23256 in) to 32 millimetres (1+14 in). The larva is variable in color based on age. Younger larvae tend to be a lighter green while older ones develop to a dark green or brown color. A bright yellow stripe along the dorsal surface is a characteristic feature of the larvae. The larvae also have no hair. Newly hatched larvae can be found by looking for scratch marks on leaf surfaces. Since S. litura is nocturnal, the larvae feed at night. During the day, they can usually be found in the soil around the plant. There are six instar stages, and by the last stage, the final instar can weigh up to 800 mg.[5]

Newly hatched 1st instar larva
Spodoptera litura late instar caterpillar.jpg

Pupa

Pupation lasts around 7 to 10 days and takes place on the soil near the base of the plant. The pupa is typically 15–20 millimetres (19322532 in) long, and its color is red-brown.[5] A characteristic feature is the presence of two small spines at the tip of the abdomen that are about 0.5 millimetres (5256 in) long each.[6]

Adult

Adult moths are on average 15–20 millimetres (19322532 in) long and have a total wingspan of 30–38 millimetres (1+3161+12 in). The body is a gray-brown color. The forewings are patterned with dark gray, red, and brown colors. The hindwings are grayish-white with a gray outline.[5] The mean female longevity is 8.3 days while for males it is 10.4 days.[11]

Male

Mating

There is no mating activity on the first night that the moth emerges.[11] The second night, however, accounts for about 70% of the matings.[1] This night marks the maximum activity. Females mate an average of 3.1 times while the males have a mating average of 10.3. During copulation, males transfer a mean of 1,052,640 sperm per mating.[11] Eggs during mating are laid in a cluster covered with hair from the female's abdomen. This acts as a protective layer from parasites predating on eggs.[12] Since S. litura is a nocturnal moth, all reproductive activities occur during the scotophase (dark phase). These reproductive activities include calling, courtship, mating, and oviposition. Several studies have pointed out that the female lifespan decreases after mating. The reasons for this are still not fully known. Several possible explanations include physical injuries from the male genitalia or the male accessory gland secretions that force females to commit more resources to reproduction instead of on herself.[1]

Male accessory glands

Male accessory glands (MAGs) are a reproductive evolutionary strategy adopted by males to gain higher fertilization. MAGs contain many different kinds of molecules including carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. When MAGs are transferred from the male to the female during copulation, it exerts a wide range of effects on female post-mating behavior. One of these effects include suppressing female receptivity to future matings by reducing their sexual receptivity or sexual attractiveness. Experiments have shown that females exposed to MAGs do not engage in mating call behavior the night they are exposed to the secretion. A successful mating that resulted in fertilized eggs led to an even longer break from sexual receptivity.[1]

Mating also has an effect on stimulating egg production and ovulation. This phenomenon may also be a result of the mechanical stimulation of male genitalia during copulation. However, studies have shown that MAG secretions are necessary for the maximum stimulation of the eggs. As a result, female longevity is negatively correlated with the number of eggs laid because a large portion of resources end up being used for the development of eggs instead of on herself.[1]

Pheromones

In sexually reproductive animals, recognition and attraction of potential mates can occur in the form of pheromones.[13] In moth species, pheromones are produced by the females by pheromone glands and are released to attract males of their own species.[14] Accurate recognition of compatible mates is essential for reproductive success because failure to do so will come with steep costs: wasted time and energy, higher risk of predation, and reduction of viable offspring. Therefore, there is a strong selection for correct mate recognition signals that maximize reproductive fitness. Both S. litura and S. littoralis share the same 11 components that make up their pheromones (in different amounts), with (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z9,E11–14:Ac) acting as the major component.[13]

There is an inverse relationship between pheromone concentration within the bodies of females and the calling behavior of a female. This is because pheromones are released during female calling. It has been previously stated that the male accessory gland suppresses female calling and subsequently, re-mating. With calling suppressed, pheromone concentration builds up in the body of mated females. Therefore, when pheromone glands are analyzed, mated females will have a higher titre than virgin females. It is important to note that this result is different from previous studies on other insect species.[14]

Circadian rhythm

The circadian rhythm also affects pheromone release. It has been found that higher amounts of pheromones are released during scotophase (dark period) and that lower levels are released during photophase (light period). This pattern is thought to coincide with male flight patterns, which would maximize responsiveness to the pheromone signals being sent.[14]

Heterospecific matings

Heterospecific matings can be expected for phylogenetically closely related species with adjacent distribution, as is the case for S. litura and S. littoralis. Overlap in pheromone composition as discussed above also contributes to the lack of total reproductive isolation between the two species. Previous experiments have already shown that mating reduces the lifespan of female S. litura. This lifespan decreases even further when mating with a heterospecific S. littoralis male. It has also been shown that females lay significantly more eggs after a conspecific mating rather than after a heterospecific mating. Therefore, there is an evolutionary benefit to recognizing and mating with a mate of the same species.[13]

Predators

So far there are a reported 131 species of natural enemies that prey on S. litura at different points in their life cycle. These include different species of parasites that specifically target either the egg, larval, or pupal stage. There are also 36 species of insect and 12 species of spider that are known to be natural predators to the moths. The identity of these predators vary depending on the region being studied. Additionally, infections from fungi and viruses have been observed. The most commonly reported viruses are nuclear polyhedrosis viruses and granulosis viruses.[5] For example, in Karnataka, a granulosis virus was found in dead S. litura larvae. In this study, both eggs and larvae were susceptible, and the mortality rate ranged from 50% to 100% depending on the stage of the larvae. The older larvae were killed more rapidly than the younger larvae.[5]

Chemical signals

There are many ways the predators can locate its prey. One way is the release of chemical cues from the larvae that can act as a locator for predators searching for prey. The stink bug Eocanthecona furcellata is a predator that uses these types of chemical signals to locate and attain prey. Its prey locating behavior is activated when exposed to two chemical compounds released by S. litura larvae.[15]

Host plants

S. litura has over 112 host species belonging to over 40 plant families, making the species highly polyphagous.[9] S. litura cause severe damage to their hosts by their vicious eating habits as larvae. Some common host plants include but are not limited to: tobacco, cotton, soybean, beet, cabbage, and chickpeas.[3] When the host plant in a particular area is depleted, big groups of larvae will migrate to find a new food source.[5]

Interaction with humans

Pest activity

Some external signs of pest activity that can be seen are large holes on leaves, injured stem bases, and discoloration of leaves.[8] Because S. litura acts as a pest on many different kinds of agricultural crops, its presence can cause economic losses in regions where these crops are cultivated. For example, S. litura has been responsible for the 71% yield loss of groundnut in the southern states of India.[3] Another figure shows that S. litura can decrease tobacco yield by 23–50%. This can cause major economic strain since 36 million people are directly or indirectly involved in the production, sale, marketing, or transport of the tobacco crop. The significant impact on agriculture S. litura can have as pests has earned the species a spot on the quarantine list for many countries including the United States of America.[8]

Pesticides

Due to its presence in many important crops in agriculture, pesticides are always being applied on the species throughout the year. This has caused the rapid evolution of pesticide and insecticide resistance in S. litura.[9] In addition, the sheer amount of pesticides being used have caused concern for pesticide residue on food, environmental damage, and the destruction of beneficial species. Therefore, recent research studies have focused on other biological ways to effectively control these pests.[4] A current study of controlling this pest focuses on using the fungus Nomuraea rileyi on the larval stage of this moth. It was found that spraying a solution of this fungus on larvae in a laboratory setting has led to effective control of the late second and early third instar stages of the larvae on castor crops. When tested in the field, there was a very high larvae mortality of 88–97% 19 days after application of the fungal solution.[16]

See also

Citations

  1. ^ a b c d e Yu, Jin-Feng; Li, Cong; Xu, Jin; Liu, Jian-Hong; Ye, Hui (2014). "Male Accessory Gland Secretions Modulate Female Post-Mating Behavior in the Moth Spodoptera litura". Journal of Insect Behavior. 27 (1): 105–116. doi:10.1007/s10905-013-9414-4. S2CID 16139914.
  2. ^ a b c "Spodoptera litturalis and Spodoptera litura" (PDF). EPPO. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
  3. ^ a b c Abbas, Naeem; Shad, Sarfraz Ali; Razaq, Muhammad (2012-07-01). "Fitness cost, cross resistance and realized heritability of resistance to imidacloprid in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 103 (3): 181–188. doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.05.001.
  4. ^ a b Seth, Rakesh K.; Khan, Zubeda; Rao, Dev K.; Zarin, Mahtab (2016-06-01). "Flight Activity and Mating Behavior of Irradiated Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Males and Their F1 Progeny for Use of Inherited Sterility in Pest Management Approaches". Florida Entomologist. 99 (sp1): 119–130. doi:10.1653/024.099.sp115. ISSN 0015-4040.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o "Spodoptera litura (taro caterpillar)". www.cabi.org. Retrieved 2017-09-26.
  6. ^ a b c "PM 7/124 (1) Spodoptera littoralis, Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera frugiperda, Spodoptera eridania". EPPO Bulletin. 45 (3): 410–444. 2015-12-01. doi:10.1111/epp.12258. ISSN 1365-2338.
  7. ^ Lee, Kwang Pum (2010-11-01). "Sex-specific differences in nutrient regulation in a capital breeding caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)". Journal of Insect Physiology. 56 (11): 1685–1695. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.06.014. PMID 20619268.
  8. ^ a b c "Noctuidae - Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)" (PDF). LepIntercept. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
  9. ^ a b c Ahmad, Munir; Saleem, Mushtaq Ahmed; Sayyed, Ali H (2009-03-01). "Efficacy of insecticide mixtures against pyrethroid- and organophosphate-resistant populations of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Pest Management Science. 65 (3): 266–274. doi:10.1002/ps.1681. ISSN 1526-4998. PMID 19051214.
  10. ^ Jitendra, Yadav; Ching-Wen, Tan; Shaw-Yhi, Hwang (2010-12-01). "Spatial Variation in Foliar Chemicals Within Radish (Raphanus sativus) Plants and Their Effects on Performance of Spodoptera litura". Environmental Entomology. 39 (6): 1990–1996. doi:10.1603/EN10118. ISSN 0046-225X. PMID 22182566.
  11. ^ a b c Etman, Ahmed a. M.; Hooper, G. H. S. (1980-04-01). "Developmental and Reproductive Biology of Spodoptera litura (f.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Australian Journal of Entomology. 18 (4): 363–372. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.1979.tb00868.x. ISSN 1440-6055.
  12. ^ Fukuda, T.; Wakamura, S.; Arakaki, N.; Yamagishi, K. (April 2004). "Parasitism, development and adult longevity of the egg parasitoid Telenomus nawai (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) on the eggs of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Bulletin of Entomological Research. 97 (2): 185–190. doi:10.1017/S0007485307004841. ISSN 1475-2670. PMID 17411481. S2CID 24593677.
  13. ^ a b c Saveer, Ahmed M.; Becher, Paul G.; Birgersson, Göran; Hansson, Bill S.; Witzgall, Peter; Bengtsson, Marie (2014). "Mate recognition and reproductive isolation in the sibling species Spodoptera littoralis and Spodoptera litura". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2. doi:10.3389/fevo.2014.00018. ISSN 2296-701X.
  14. ^ a b c Lu, Qin; Huang, Ling-Yan; Liu, Fang-Tao; Wang, Xia-Fei; Chen, Peng; Xu, Jin; Deng, Jian-Yu; Ye, Hui (2017-06-01). "Sex pheromone titre in the glands of Spodoptera litura females: circadian rhythm and the effects of age and mating". Physiological Entomology. 42 (2): 156–162. doi:10.1111/phen.12185. ISSN 1365-3032. S2CID 89807432.
  15. ^ Yasuda, Tetsuya (1997-03-01). "Chemical cues from Spodoptera litura larvae elicit prey-locating behavior by the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 82 (3): 349–354. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00149.x. ISSN 1570-7458. S2CID 84406457.
  16. ^ Devi, P. S. Vimala (1994). "Conidia Production of the Entomopathogenic Fungus Nomuraea rileyi and Its Evaluation for Control of Spodoptera litura (Fab) on Ricinus communis". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 63 (2): 145–150. doi:10.1006/jipa.1994.1028.
Male

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Spodoptera litura: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

Spodoptera litura, otherwise known as the tobacco cutworm or cotton leafworm, is a nocturnal moth in the family Noctuidae. S. litura is a serious polyphagous pest in Asia, Oceania, and the Indian subcontinent that was first described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1775. Its common names reference two of the most frequent host plants of the moth. In total, 87 species of host plants that are infested by S. litura are of economic importance. The species parasitize the plants through the larvae vigorous eating patterns, oftentimes leaving the leaves completely destroyed. The moth's effects are quite disastrous, destroying economically important agricultural crops and decreasing yield in some plants completely. Their potential impact on the many different cultivated crops, and subsequently the local agricultural economy, has led to serious efforts to control the pests.

S. litura is often confused with its close relative, Spodoptera littoralis. These two species are hard to discriminate between because the larvae and adult forms are identical. Inspecting the genitalia is the most certain way to tell the two species apart.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN