dcsimg

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval)
Figs. 163, 263-267, 326, 356, 388, 420, 452, 498-500, 537
Hadena littoralis Boisduval 1833: 91.
Hadena retina Freyer 1845: 161, plate 478, figs. 2,3; Walker 1856: 192.
Prodenia testaceoides Guenee in Boisduval & Guenee 1852a: 165, plate 6, fig. 7; Viette 1951: 160; Walker 1856: 195.
Prodenia littoralis: Mabille 1879: 320; Cotes & Swinhoe 1888: 325 ; Swinhoe 1890: 227; Hampson 1894: 247.
Spodoptera littoralis; Viette 1963: 147; Brown & Dewhurst 1975: 256; Goater 1983: 277; Poole 1989: 924.
Diagnosis. — Color and pattern almost indistinguishable from S. litura. Hindwing with apices of veins white. Male genitalia with juxta quadrate; ampulla more robust than in S. litura (compare Figs. 356 and 357); dorsal lobes of coremata much shorter than ventral lobes (Fig. 356). Female genitalia with distal margin of ventral plate of ostium bursa straight (Fig. 452); ductus bursae shorter than S. litura (compare Figs. 420 and 421).
Description. Adult Male. — Head: Basal segment of labial palpus cream with median patch variably mixed with black and rufous scales; median segment cream with black median band variably mixed with rufous scales; apical segment black, apex cream. Frons with short scales cream; long scales brown and cream; lateral spots at eye margin brown to black; vertex cream and brown. Antenna filiform; scape cream to light brown; flagellum cream.
Thorax: Patagium light brown to brown flecked with black, median transverse band white, apical margin white. Tegula light brown and white (black scales at caudomedial apex). Mesothorax with light brown and brown scales,
some tipped white. Underside of thorax white. Prothoracic femur fuscous and cream; tibia with lateral scale tufts not extending beyond first tarsal segment, cream and fuscous, subapical spot black; tarsal segments cream. Mesothoracic femur fuscous and cream; tibia fuscous and cream, inner spur less than twice length of outer spur, mediolateral surface broadly devoid of scales on both spurs; tarsal segments 1-4 fuscous with cream apical rings, segment 5 cream. Metathoracic femur cream and fuscous; tibia cream, rufous, and fuscous; tarsal segments 1-4 cream with bases fuscous, segment 5 cream.
Foreioing: Length, 12-16 mm; ground color brown; basal line absent; longitudinal black dash at base absent; R vein from base to reniform spot gray; basal triangular scale patch between R and Cu veins brown bordered by white; basal half circle scale patch below Cu vein light brown bordered by black; antemedial line black, indistinct; claviform spot absent; basal scale patch small, gray, from midway between M and anal veins to anal vein; gray patch covering anal cell and half of cell CuA2 absent; oblique brown mark from fifth outer marginal spot to vein CuA2 absent; curved white line from antemedial line to postmedial line absent; orbicular spot an oblique trapezoid, cream, with a light brown center bordered by light brown to black; reniform spot brown outlined in white on proximal border, distal apex is a triangular light brown spot outlined in white, a white distal border extending to middle; white scales along Cu vein from orbicular spot to junction of veins M3 and CuAl which extend down veins M3, CuAl, and CuA2 to postmedial line; postmedial line indistinct, black variably bordered by white from middle to posterior margin; postmedian band pale gray and with an elliptical brown spot along subterminal line; black scale patches in middle of cells M2 to CuAl in postmedian area; subterminal line a light brown band bordered by white; apex with a few white scales, no distinct patch; dark gray spindleshaped spots along outer margin; fringe gray. Underside ground color pale gray; outer margin with black crescent-shaped spots; reniform spot gray.
Hindwing: Ground color white; apex, outer margin to vein CuA2, and distal ends of veins Rs to CuA2 with light brown scales; fringe white. Underside ground color white; costal cells C and Sc cream speckled with pale gray scales; outer
margin with a few faint gray spots in middle of cells Sc to CuAl; no spot on underside.
Abdomen: Dorsum pale gray; venter cream to pale gray; disto-lateral black spots on sternites (can be indistinct to absent); 8th tergite with spiculate patches present on caudal margin.
Genitalia: Uncus evenly curved; slender, gradually narrowing toward pointed apex; setae absent or few. Scaphium elongate, weakly developed. Tegumen lacking a pair of projecting arms on upper third. Costa straight (Figs. 326, 356). Costal process narrow, elongate; at base of costa on inner edge; perpendicular to costa of valve. Cucullus apex truncate; not produced. Anellifer with lightly sclerotized plate bearing setae present. Ampulla elongate, slightly curved with a decurved apex; extends beyond apex of valve (Figs. 326, 356). Clasper proper absent. Clavus a minute round projection. Sacculus widest at one-fourth its length, tapering distally; apex pointed. Valvula wider than valve; well differentiated from valve, apex free; apex truncate; indentation large, ventral margin round. Coremata elongate, more than 0.5 length of valve; in form of a double lobe. Juxta a broad rectangular band with ventrolateral projections, median process not constricted, ventral margin concave. Anellus membranous. Vinculum U-shaped with parallel arms and a robust base. Aedoeagus straight; coecum smaller in diameter than shaft; patch of spines absent on apex of membranous sheath surrounding aedoeagus. Vesica curving ventrally; short, less than 0.75 length of aedoeagus; apicobasal cornutal patch a wide ribbon; length moderate, extending to before middle of vesica; cornuti in form of minute flat granules; lateral cornutal patch an elongate elliptical area; a mixture of small spines distally and large spines apically; dense cornutal patch subapical on vesica; distal cornutus a bulbous elliptical plate, apex pointed.
Adult Female. — Essentially as described for male except:
Forewing: Length, 13-16 mm. Longitudinal black dash at base absent; R vein not a contrasting color; gray patch covering anal cell and half of cell CuA2 absent; curved white line from antemedial line to postmedial line absent; orbicular spot an oblique trapezoid, cream, with a gray center, bordered by thin black line distally; reniform spot more gray with a light brown to gray apical spot outlined in white; postmedian band less distinct and tends to be more brown; black scale patches
in middle of cells R4 to CuA2, patch in R4 basal to other patches, patch in R5 consisting of only a few scales in postmedian area.
Abdomen: Fine dense scales on 8th segment cream.
Genitalia: Ventral plate of ostium bursa with height greater than width; distal margin straight; ventrolateral invaginated pocket of 8th sternite absent. Ductus bursae short (length less than twice width); completely sclerotized. Appendix bursae membranous. Corpus bursae bulbous, length less than twice width; striate convolutions. Signum in apical half of corpus bursae; short, length less than 0.65 mm; forming greater than a 45 degree angle to vertical axis of corpus bursae.
Larva. — See description, p. 110.
Type material. — Hadena Httoralis Boisduval. The type material was not located during this study and is considered lost. The neotype 8 [USNM, here designated] is labeled: Uganda; Ankole; Kichwamba; IV-23-29-68; P. J. Spangler. Genitalia Slide; By MGP 6; USNM 46193. SPOD 0216. The neotype is designated and labeled to ensure nomenclatural stability in this confusing group of species and is illustrated in Fig. 263. Type locality: Kichwamba, Ankole, Uganda.
Hadena retina Freyer. The type repository is unknown. Type locality: Crete, Greece.
Prodenia testaceoides Guenee. The lectotype 8 is deposited in the MNHP, designated by Viette 1951: 160. Type locality: Mauritius.
Material Examined. — Specimens were examined from the following countries: Algeria, Angola, British Indian Ocean Territory, Cameroon, Canary Islands, Comoro Islands, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea Republic, He Maurice, Israel, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Principe Island, Reunion, Sao Tome Island, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, St. Helena, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe.
Distribution (Fig. 537). — This species ranges from southern Europe and Africa east to the Middle East and western Asia including the Arabian Peninsula, Iran, Iraq, and Pakistan. It is also found in the Seychelles, Mauritius, Reunion, and Rodrigues in the Indian Ocean (Brown & Dewhurst 1975).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Pogue, M.G. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 20. Philadelphia, USA

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval)
Figs. 163, 498-500
Diagnosis. — Characters useful for identification include the serrate edge of the mandible, P2 setae farther apart than PI setae, absence of dorsolateral stripe on the pronotum, and metathorax with a dorsolateral mark. This species could be confused with S. exigna, especially in the early instars, but in S. exigna the dorsolateral stripe is present on the pronotum and the metathorax lacks dorsolateral spots. Larvae of S. littoralis are either light or dark brown, in S. exigna they can be brown or green (Brown & Dewhurst 1975). Spodoptera littoralis is larger than S. exigna. Spodoptera litnra can be distinguished from S. littoralis by the prominent lateral spots present from the mesothorax to the eighth abdominal segment.
Description of preserved specimens. — Head: Color brown; reticulate; frons brown; cutting
edge of mandible serrate; P2 setae farther apart than PI setae; ratio ecdysial line: frons height, averages between 0.63-0.84. Thorax: Pronotum with dorsolateral stripe absent or inconspicuous, consisting of only a few faded spots at margins; middorsal stripe narrower than dorsolateral stripe. Mesothorax segmental spot rectangular to semicircular; with lateral dark spot present (indistinct). Metathorax with segmental spot round; white spot at base of segmental spot; lateral dark spot absent. Abdomen: Body smooth; setal pinacula minute. Middorsal stripe inconspicuous, narrower than dorsolateral stripe. Segmental spots on abdominal segments 7 and 8 larger than on 1-6; wide on segments 1 and 8, almost extending to middorsal stripe; a white spot mid-basally in segmental spot (segmental spots can be reduced to a dark line, but spot is still present); on 8th abdominal segment spot is subequal in size to that on mesothorax. Segment 1 with lateral dark spot absent. Segments 2-6 with lateral dark spots in spiracular band absent. Spiracular band reticulate; segments 1-6 in spiracular band with white or light colored spot caudal to spiracle present (indistinct). Spiracles with black border and brown center; not stalked. Subspiracular stripe continuous through abdominal segment 1. Crochets uniordinal; total number on one side of body greater than 107.
Color description. — Head black; adfrontal and coronal sutures yellow. Ground color purplish black. Segmental triangular spots black. Venter pale. Thoracic legs black (Sevastopulo 1939a).
Plant hosts. — S. littoralis is a polyphagous species recorded from 130 species in 56 families of host plants. It is one of the most agriculturally important species over its range. Many plants it attacks are of major economic importance such as taro, cabbage, beet, castor oil plant, peanut, soybean, green gram, rice, cotton, corn, tomato, and tobacco.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Pogue, M.G. 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 20. Philadelphia, USA

Spodoptera littoralis

provided by wikipedia EN

Spodoptera littoralis, also referred to as the African cotton leafworm or Egyptian cotton leafworm or Mediterranean brocade, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. S. littoralis is found widely in Africa, Mediterranean Europe and Middle Eastern countries. It is a highly polyphagous organism that is a pest of many cultivated plants and crops.[1] As a result, this species was assigned the label of A2 quarantine pest by the EPPO and was cautioned as a highly invasive species in the United States.[2][3] The devastating impacts caused by these pests have led to the development of both biological and chemical control methods.[4] This moth is often confused with Spodoptera litura.[4]

Taxonomy

Egyptian cotton leafworm is one of the many species of genus Spodoptera and family Noctuidae. The family Noctuidae was named by a French zoologist, Pierre André Latreille, in 1809 and the genus Noctuidae was named by a French entomologist, Achille Guenée, in 1852. Many of the species of genus Spodoptera are known to be pest insects.[5] The species was named by Jean Baptiste Boisduval in 1833. Synonyms of S. littoralis include Hadena littoralis and Prodenia littoralis. Due to the similarities between many pest insects, there have been noted incidents of many species that are almost identical to S. littoralis. For example, Spodoptera litura or cotton leafworm is often confused with S. littoralis, since the larvae and adult stages of two species are near identical. However, Viette demonstrated that these are two different species, as S. litura was found to mostly reside in Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands.[4][6]

Description

View of hind wings

The adult moth has a body size that ranges from 15 to 20 mm and wingspan that ranges from 30 to 38 mm. The species' forewings are grey-brown colored and has an ocellus that are constructed by white oblique lines. The hind wings are usually much paler and have grey-colored margins.[1][4]

Similar species

Spodoptera littoralis is often confused with Spodoptera litura due to similar larvae and adult physical appearances. A bright yellow stripe along the dorsal side of the larvae is characteristic of S. litura. However, due to the variability in markings, the only certain way of distinguishing between the two species is by comparing the genitalia.[4] Specifically, ductus and ostium bursae are known to be the same length in S. littoralis females but different in S. litura females.[7] Similarly, it was reported that Prodenia ornithogalli is an American representative of S. littoralis as forms of the two species are extremely close and related. The main difference between these species is that P. ornithogalli is much darker in color and has sharper markings.[8]

Distribution and habitat

African cotton leafworm is native to Africa and also resides in most regions of Middle Eastern countries such as Israel, Syria and Turkey. Specifically, the species' native habitat is F5 (EUNIS code), which is semi-arid and subtropical habitats in pre-saharan Africa.[9] This species has also been found in Southern and Mediterranean Europe, mainly in Spain, France, Italy and Greece.[1] As the African cotton leafworm is prone to cold weather, the species' natural range is limited in the northern regions of Europe such as the United Kingdom. The optimal temperature for the species' reproductive potential is around 25 °C, so areas with lower winter temperatures or fluctuating temperatures show limited species distribution.[4][10] Studies have shown that temperatures over 40 °C or below 13 °C showed increased in mortality.[9] Combination of high temperature and low humidity are detrimental to the species survival as temperature over 40 °C or below 13 °C tend to increase mortality rate.[9] As a result, S. littoralis resides in regions where temperature fluctuation is rare to feed on variety of host plants, in which the females lay eggs and the larvae primarily grow.[4]

Species distribution mainly occurs through trade when egg or larvae get on the imported ornamentals or crops. Adult moths are often distributed by wind but are also transported by other species. Adult moths fly as well.[9]

Food resources

Spodoptera littoralis is reported to be polyphagous, and the range of host plants on which the larvae feed covers over 40 different plant families and at least 87 different plant species. The species is known as a pest of several economically important crops such as Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Zea mays (corn), Triticum aestivum (wheat), Capsicum (peppers), Chloris gayana (rhodes grass) and Hibiscus mutabilis (cottonrose).[4] The larvae prefer to feed on young leaves, young shoots, stalks, bolls, buds and fruits. Some of its recorded host plants are known to affect larval growth. For example, larvae that fed on castor oil leaves had shortened larval and pupal duration, whereas these durations were prolonged in larvae that fed on sweet potato leaves.[11]

Parental care

Oviposition

Oviposition refers to a process in which animals lay eggs. There are three different oviposition sites of S. littoralis females. Of the three, young leaves are particularly preferred by the females as they serve as food sources for the hatching larvae. Eggs are also often deposited on fully expanded leaves or mature leaves but larvae hatching from these leaves move to feed on young leaves. Larvae that fed on young leaves or fully expanded leaves were found to have significantly faster growth rate compared to others that fed on mature leaves.[12]

Life cycle

Egg

Female moths lay a batch of eggs that ranges from 20 to 1,000 eggs on the lower side of a host plant's leaves. After the eggs are laid, female coats the eggs with scales from its abdomen. These spherical eggs show white to yellowish color and are 0.6 mm in diameter. These white-yellow color of the eggs turn black just before hatching due to the presence of black larval head near the transparent shell.[1][4]

Larvae

Spodoptera littoralis larvae

Larvae body length ranges from 40 to 45 mm. The larvae is usually hairless and varies in color. It has been noted that new born larvae has grayish or dark-green body color whereas the developed larvae has brownish or yellowish body color. Dark and light longitudinal bands along with two dark semi-circular spots on the back are noted characteristics of the larvae. The newly hatched larvae up to third-instar mainly feed on the lower side of the leaves but the later instar larvae feed on both sides. S. littoralis larvae in general are known to feed in the dark. It also has been observed that larvae up to their third and fourth-instar usually remain in their host plant but fifth and sixth-instar larvae leave the host plant during the day and climb back up at night.[1][4]

Pupa

The pupa is around 20 mm long and cylindrical in shape. Initially, the pupa is green colored with reddish abdomen but it turns reddish-brown within few hours. Pupation usually occurs 3–5 cm deep in the solid ground under soil. The duration of pupation is around 5–6 hours.[1][4]

Adult

Adult moth has a greyish-brown body that is around 15–20 millimetres (9161316 in) long. The wingspan of the adult moth ranges from 30–38 millimetres (1+3161+12 in). The forewing of the adult moth has brownish color with paler veins whereas the hindwing is more lightly colored (greyish-white). There are also oblique white bands on the forewing.[4] The adult moth appears at night and live about 5–10 days.[13]

Neurochemistry

Larvae have been found to suffer drastic feeding inhibition from injection with myosuppressin, by Vilaplana et al. 2008.[14]

Predators

There are many known predators, pathogens and parasite species that control the growth and distribution of S. littoralis. Of the natural predators of S. littoralis, ladybirds have been noted to prey on young larvae and eggs. Other known generalist predators include Paederus fuscipes (staphylinid rove beetle), Paederus alferii, Labidura riparia, Creontiades pallidus and so on.[4] Spiders are also known predators of this species. Specifically, Cheiracanthium mildei and Ummeliata insecticeps are known dominant predator species of S. littoralis that not only feed on the larvae but also induce dispersion from host plant.[15]

Mating

Copulation characteristics

Copulation refers to sexual behaviors observed in animals. Most adult moths mate on the day that they emerge from pupation. Duration of copulation ranges from 20 minutes to two hours. Studies revealed that age difference between the male and female moth is crucial in determining reproductive capacity, adult lifespan and egg quality.[4] The most effective age difference that increased egg fertility was four days difference between the male and female. When a four-day-old male mated with a fresh born female, egg fertility was observed to be high. However, females laid most eggs when it mated with a male who was one day older.[16]

Pheromones

Pheromones refer to chemical factors secreted by an organism that effect the social behavior of other organisms that receive them. The pheromone secreted by females for mate calling is (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate. As most matings occur at night, females producing largest amount of pheromone was observed 2–3 hours into scotophase, a dark phase of light cycle. The amount of pheromone in these females ranged from 6 to 8 ng. Lowest amount of pheromone was excreted few hours before the dark phase ended.[17] Other than its function to attract mates, female-produced pheromones may also synchronize male circadian rhythm.[18]

Courting

Courting is a behavior that displays the attempt of one sex of the species to attract the other sex for copulation. Antennae serves an important function in adult moth courtship. A male answering a female mate-call fully extends its antennae while flying over the female. A sign of rejection in females is noted by rapid wing flicks, whereas lifted wings, curved abdomen and withdrawal of pheromone in females are signs of female's acceptance for copulation. Once male and female are attached during copulation, male move its head downwards. Males without antennae did not answer female mate-call, which resulted in lack of mating. Females without antennae seldom mated but all matings were reported to be abnormal.[19]

Physiology

Flight

Flight in insects refer to a process in which an organism moves from one place to another with the usage of its wings. S. littoralis can fly up to distances of 1.5 km over a four-hour period. Since the species is nocturnal, its peak flight activity is usually between the hours of 20:00 and midnight.[4] The flight activity for the moth can extend up to 10 days while an adult. Research has also shown that wind direction seems to have an effect on the moth's flight activity.[13]

Antennal lobe

Antenna are paired appendages attached to an arthropod's head that usually has a sensory function. Antenna in S. littoralis has an important function in facilitating mating. Experiments showed that antennal lobe of adult antenna are responsible for detecting different types of sensory inputs that are necessary for the adults to respond to external stimuli. Specifically, antennal lobe are responsible for identifying olfactory and mechanosensory stimulus.[20]

Diapause

Diapause is defined as a delay in development caused by adverse external environmental factors. Mature larvae dig down the soil where it forms a cocoon to go under pupation. Larvae in its pupal stage can go through diapause but it is vulnerable to continuous frost and cold weather. However, it is generally known that S. littoralis larvae do not go through diapause.[21][22]

Interaction with humans

Pest of crop plants

Because of S. littoralis' polyphagous behavior, the species has been damaging to many economically crucial crops such as cotton, tomato, maize and various other vegetables. Most of the damages are a direct result of extensive larvae feeding. Often, larvae will either create large holes in the leaves, only leaving the big veins of the leaves, or bear into the bud for consumption.[23] Most of the plants or vegetables that are attacked by S. littoralis are unsuitable for consumption as the damages are too severe. Of different types of host plants, cotton has been one of the main targets of S. littoralis. The species feed on cotton leaves, flower buds, fruiting points, and bolls, leaving the plant unsuitable for any further usage. Such damage of cotton plant is most prevalent in North Africa, especially in Egypt.[4] As a result, EPPO has assigned S. littoralis as A2 quarantine pest.[2] In the United States, S. littoralis has been listed as an exotic organism with high invasive risk.[3] Since 2004, there have been 65 reported incidents of S. littoralis that were present at various U.S. ports of entry.[24]

Prevention and control

Due to S. littoralis' devastating effect on crops, numerous attempts have been made to counteract the species' dispersion and activities. These preventative methods are mainly divided into biological and chemical methods. Biological methods include using parasitoids or predators to control moth reproduction and dispersion.[4] Usage of bacteria such as Bacillus thuringiensis in combination with bacterial endochitinase has also been utilized recently to control many bacteria-resistant strains of S. littoralis larvae. Studies revealed that the synergistic toxic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis and bacterial endochitinase successfully resulted in reduced larval weight.[25] However, direct usage of these biological methods are yet not legal.[4] Similarly, chemical insecticides including organophosphorus, synthetic pyrethroids have been widely used to control S. littoralis.[4] Recent studies also revealed that insect growth regulators such as azadirachtin from neem tree are effective in controlling S. littoralis larvae as azadirachtin-treated larvae had overall higher mortality rate as well as reduced growth rate due to increased deformity and growth disruption.[26]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Noma, T; Colunga-Garcia, M; Brewer, M; Landis, J; Gooch, A. "Egyptian cottonworm: Spodoptera littoralis" (PDF). ipm.msu.edu. Michigan State University.
  2. ^ a b OEPP/EPPO (2015). "Diagnostic protocol for Spodoptera littoralis, Spodoptera litura, Spodoptera frugiperda, Spodoptera eridania". Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 34: 257–270.
  3. ^ a b USDA-APHIS (2008). "Pests of national concern for fiscal year 2009". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s "Spodoptera littoralis (cotton leafworm)". CABI. Retrieved 11 October 2017.
  5. ^ Meagher, Robert (2008). "Monitoring for exotic Spodoptera species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Florida". USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology: 517–522.
  6. ^ Viette, Pierre (1962). "Nouvelles espèces malgaches de Noctuelles Quadrifides (Lépidoptères)". Bulletin de l'Académie Malgache: 1–825.
  7. ^ "Spodoptera litura (taro caterpillar)". CABI. Retrieved 11 October 2017.
  8. ^ Transactions of the Entomological Society of London (vol 38 ed.). Royal Entomological Society of London. 1890. p. 227.
  9. ^ a b c d Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos (2008). "Species Accounts of 100 of the Most Invasive Alien Species in Europe". Species Accounts of 100 of the Most Invasive Species in Europe. Vol. 3. Springer Science. pp. 269–374. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_13. ISBN 978-1-4020-8279-5.
  10. ^ Sidibe, B; Lauge, G (1977). "Effect of warm periods and of constant temperatures on some biological criteria in Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval (Lepidoptera Noctuidae)". Annales de la Société Entomologique de France. 13: 369–379.
  11. ^ Salama, H; Dimetry, N; Salem, S (1971). "On the host preference and biology of the Cotton Leaf Worm Spodoptera littoralis Bois". Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie. 67 (1–4): 261–266. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1971.tb02122.x.
  12. ^ Sadek, Medhat (2010). "Complementary Behaviors of Maternal and Offspring Spodoptera littoralis: Oviposition Site Selection and Larval Movement Together Maximize Performance". Journal of Insect Behavior. 24 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1007/s10905-010-9238-4. S2CID 22354940.
  13. ^ a b Salama, H. S.; Shoukry, A. (1972). "Flight range of the moth of the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis (Bois.)". Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie. 71: 181–184. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1972.tb01739.x.
  14. ^ Schoofs, Liliane; De Loof, Arnold; Van Hiel, Matthias Boris (2017-01-31). "Neuropeptides as Regulators of Behavior in Insects". Annual Review of Entomology. Annual Reviews. 62 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035500. ISSN 0066-4170. PMID 27813667.
  15. ^ Mansour, Fadel; Rosen, David; Shulov, A (1981). "Disturbing effect of a spider on larval aggregations of Spodoptera littoralis". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 29 (2): 234–237. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1981.tb03063.x. S2CID 84583609.
  16. ^ Nasr, ESA; Nassif, FM (1978). "Effect of age of the adult stage of the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.), on the rate of oviposition, egg-fertility and life span of moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Égypte. 59: 289–294.
  17. ^ Dunkelblum, E; Kehat, M; Harel, M; Gordon, D (1987). "Sexual behaviour and pheromone titre of the Spodoptera littoralis female moth". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 44 (3): 241–247. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1987.tb00551.x. S2CID 83927281.
  18. ^ Silvegren, Germund; Löfstedt, Christer; Rosén, Wen Qi (2005). "Circadian mating activity and effect of pheromone pre-exposure on pheromone response rhythms in the moth Spodoptera littoralis". Journal of Insect Physiology. 51 (3): 277–286. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.11.013. PMID 15749110.
  19. ^ Ellis, Peggy; Brimacombe, Linda (1980). "The mating behaviour of the Egyptian cotton leafworm moth, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)". Animal Behaviour. 28 (4): 1239–1248. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80112-6. S2CID 53188823.
  20. ^ Han, Q; Hansson, BS; Anton, S (2005). "Interactions of mechanical stimuli and sex pheromone information in antennal lobe neurons of a male moth, Spodoptera littoralis". J Comp Physiol A. 191 (6): 521–528. doi:10.1007/s00359-005-0618-8. PMID 15856257. S2CID 9628822.
  21. ^ Gerson, Uri (2015-05-24). "Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval)". agri.huji.ac.il. The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
  22. ^ Crop Science. "Spodoptera littoralis". cropscience.bayer.com. Bayer AG.
  23. ^ Bishara, I (1934). "The cotton worm Prodenia litura F. in Egypt". Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Égypte. 18: 223–404.
  24. ^ Ellis, S (2004). "New Pest Response Guidelines: Spodoptera". Usda/Aphis/PPQ/PDMP.
  25. ^ Regev, A; Keller, M; Zilberstein, A (1996). "Synergistic activity of a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin and a bacterial endochitinase against Spodoptera littoralis larvae". Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 (10): 3581–3586. Bibcode:1996ApEnM..62.3581R. doi:10.1128/aem.62.10.3581-3586.1996. PMC 168163. PMID 8837413.
  26. ^ Martinez, S; van Emden, H (2001). "Growth disruption, abnormalities and mortality of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) caused by Azadirachtin". Neotropical Entomology. 30: 113–125. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2001000100017.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Spodoptera littoralis: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

Spodoptera littoralis, also referred to as the African cotton leafworm or Egyptian cotton leafworm or Mediterranean brocade, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. S. littoralis is found widely in Africa, Mediterranean Europe and Middle Eastern countries. It is a highly polyphagous organism that is a pest of many cultivated plants and crops. As a result, this species was assigned the label of A2 quarantine pest by the EPPO and was cautioned as a highly invasive species in the United States. The devastating impacts caused by these pests have led to the development of both biological and chemical control methods. This moth is often confused with Spodoptera litura.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN