Worker measurements: HW 0.60 HL 0.80 EL 0.06 SL 0.64 PrW 0.49 WL 1.06 PL 0.43 PPL 0.29 PW 0.29 PPW 0.31 GL 0.92 TL 3.75 CI 75 SI 106.
Description of worker: Head in full face view longer than wide, with rounded posterolateral corners, and slightly concave posterior margin; sides slightly convex, slightly narrowing anteriorly. Basal mandibular border separated from masticatory border by distinct angle, masticatory border mostly edentate except for two apical teeth, ventral border of masticatory margin with row of thick, modified setae. Palp formula 2,2 in situ count. Anterior margin of clypeus convex, nearly angular medially; posteriorly clypeus projects narrowly between frontal lobes; median portion of clypeus raised and convex in lateral view, not modified as a flattened area and devoid of any carinae. Frontal lobes short and approximate. Antennae 11-segmented, with ill-defined 3-segmented club, the apical segment largest; scapes longer than head width, slightly incrassate subapically. Scape, when placed back, fails to reach the vertex margin by less than its maximum diameter. Eyes small, with a few ill-defined facets (about 6-7), situated slightly anterior to midlength of sides of head. Mesosoma forming a single broad and continuous convexity in lateral view, devoid of any grooves; propodeum armed with two small triangular teeth, propodeal spiracle round and at distance from propodeal margin equivalent to three diameters. Metapleural lobes broad, more or less rounded. Metapleural gland orifice not seen at 120X. Petiole large and prominent, campaniform in lateral view, in dorsal view the node longer than wide; postpetiole more or less as long as wide. Body shining and heavily foveolate, except for the smooth gaster. Most head foveae dense, about 70% of the eye size; those of mesosoma scattered and smaller in size. Body lacking pilosity, except for numerous small erect hairs arising from the cephalic foveae and anterior pronotal region; a few erect hairs on propleura and forecoxa; anterior margin of clypeus with long erect hairs, including a distinct medial seta. Dorsum of mandible, scape and flagellomeres with several erect hairs. Inner ventral margin of masticatory border of mandibles with modified thick, cylindric and transparent setae. Body light brown in color.
Queens and males: Unknown.
Geographical distribution. Known only from type locality in Negri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Discussion: Reliable placement of most genera within Myrmicinae , including the genus described here, is difficult, given the precarious state of current understanding of the phylogeny and taxonomy of the subfamily. Tyrannomyrmex possesses a unique combination of traits which separate it from other myrmicines: modified setae along the internal border of the mandibles and mandibles with two teeth, apical and subapical, with the rest of the masticatory border lacking teeth. The modified setae are reminiscent of some of the Adelomyrmex ( Fernández , 2003), but in Tyrannomyrmex the setae are thick, nonspatulate, and cylindric. A detailed SEM examination is impossible at the moment due to lack of more specimens than the holotype.
The antennal club is not easily-defined. At first glance it appears to be 2-segmented, but the last segments under careful examination might also be interpreted as 3-segmented.
Including Tyrannomyrmex in Adelomyrmex genus-group would make it difficult to explain the traits the genus does not share with the tribe, such as the antennal configuration of 11 with ill defined club of 3 segments compared with 12 with club of 2 segments in Adelomyrmex genus-group and simple clypeal configuration, without elevated platforms, keels or carinae as in Adelomyrmex genus-group. The petiole is different in shape from the adelomyrmecines and the transverse, subpostpetiolar keel, which is unambiguously in an anterior position in the tribe, is relatively shorter and more medial in Tyrannomyrmex . Notoriously absent in this genus as well are dorsal mesosomal grooves, whilst in adelomyrmecines the metanotal groove is always present.
If Tyrannomyrmex were an adelomyrmecine genus, some of its structures could be interpreted as reductions (antennae from 12 to 11 segments, mandibular teeth from 4-7 to 2, disappearance of the metanotal groove, changed configuration of the petiole and ventral keel of the postpetiole. It would be necessary to accept a double modification of the structure of the clypeus from simple to modified to a keel or longitudinal platform ( Adelomyrmex genus-group) and then back again to simple in form ( Tyrannomyrmex ).
The characteristics shared in both taxa, such as reduced palps and groove in the basalmost anterior part of the first tergum might be considered plesiomorphic characters within the Adelomyrmex genus-group, Tyrannomyrmex , and some neighboring groups, perhaps Solenopsidini and Pheidologetonini . Tyrannomyrmex could be interpreted as a basal taxon in the Adelomyrmex genus-group (or a sister group of the tribe), implying that the modified setae are homologous in both groups.
Given that Tyrannomyrmex has a medial clypeal seta, there is a possibility that it might be near to Solenopsidini . In effect, Tyrannomyrmex possesses the majority of this tribe's attributes according to Bolton's (1987) proposal, but the metapleural lobes are large and conspicuous in Tyrannomyrmex , while they are fairly reduced in Solenopsidini . Moreover, within Solenopsidini only Phacota has 11 segmented antenna with club of 2 segments configuration, though it is important to keep in mind Phacota appears to be based on an anomalous specimen, perhaps an ergatoid reproductive (Bolton, 1987), and is probably another member of Monomorium .
Within the Myrmicinae bidentate mandibles are known only in Afroxyidris , an African species (Belshaw & Bolton, 1994), and Oxyidris , described from Dominican amber (Wilson, 1985). Afroxyidris appears to be near the group of genera associated with Carebara ( Fernández , in preparation) in the tribe Pheidologetonini . The position of Oxyidris is more uncertain as even though Wilson (1985) places it near Solenopsidini , the genus lacks a median clypeal seta. I therefore do not consider Tyrannomyrmex to be near either of these genera; the possession of 2-toothed mandibles appears rather to be convergent in the three groups.
For all these reasons Tyrannomyrmex should be considered for the moment as a distinct but isolated genus of the subfamily, whose affinities might be with either the Adelomyrmex genus-group or with Solenopsidini . A detailed micrographic study might make possible a better interpretation of the structure of the modified setae of the internal part of the mandibles, the only character which might, potentially, place the genus within or near the Adelomyrmex genus-group.
