dcsimg

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Pycnoscelus surinamensis (Linnaeus) (Plate VIII, figure i.) 1767. [Blatta] sun'iuniicjisis Linnaeus, Syst. Nat., Ed. XII, p. 687. [Surinam.] 1862. Pycnoscehis ohsciinis Scudder, Proc. Bost.-Soc. Nat. Hist., ""ii, p. 422. [juv. 9 (nee. d'); Greenfield, Massachusetts.] (Unquestionably adventive.)
The additional established synonyms of the present species are Blatta indica Fabricius, Blatta melanocephala Stoll, Blatta punctata Eschscholtz, Blatta corticum Serville and Panchlora celebesa, submargiuata and occipitalis Walker,
The present species is circumtroplcal in distribution, extending its range frequently into subtropical regions. It is distinctive in appearance, the only confusion which could occur with other species found in the United States would be with Leurolestes pallidus^^^ {Naiiphoeta laevigata of authors), which species is only superficially somewhat similar in general appearance.
Characters of Female J^^ — (Miami, Florida.) Form robust, structure rather heavy. Head flattened; eyes well developed; interocular space equal to that between the pronounced ocellar spots: ocellar areas with surface feebly concave; from occiput to clypeus, minute pits are scattered over the otherwise smooth surface. Maxillary palpi short and stout; third joint flattened cylindrical, nearly as long as fifth; fourth joint slightly shorter than third, with apex truncate and feel)ly oblique, proximal portion very slender and slightly deflexed; fifth (distal) joint enlarged and elongate, distal margin oljlicjue and feebly convex from apex to near base of joint. Pronotum
•"In this feature, the [)rcscnt genus appears to be separable from all others of the Panchlorinae.
5'^ These hairs are moderately stout and regular in position; if they were slightly heavier we would use, instead, the term chaetiform spines.
^'^ See page 161.
313 We do not give the male characters in the usual position, as that sex is unknown for the regions here under consideration, where the species may prove to be parthenogenetic.
with glabrous surface showing minute, rather widely scattered pits; lateral portions fully as chitinous as disk, moderately declivent, with margins very broadly cingulate, though but little raised. Length of tegmina and wings somewhat variable, these falling slightly short of, to extending well beyond, the abdominal apex. Tegmina, proximad, thickly supplied with minute pits, these are in series laterad of each vein. Wings transparent, except in narrow area of the irregular costal veins and distal portion of anterior field, where they are translucent. Dorsal surface of abdomen unspecialized. Supra-anal plate feebly and briefly convex above bases of cerci, with free margin there feebh' concave; large mesal portion transverse, subtruncate, weakly concave except for a weak medio-longitudinal carinula, distal margin broadly convex, showing a trace of mesal emargination."^ Styles very short, joints much fused, acuminate tip flattened, dorsal surface weakly convex, ventral surface more strongly convex proximad. Subgenital plate very large, surface convex; distal margin convex, except meso-laterad at base of styles, where it is broadly and shallowly concave, mesad the convexity is weak. Armament of limbs, pulvilli and arolia, as given in generic description. The median and caudal femora have the genicular spine more elongate than the single distal spine of each ventral margin.
Characters of Male. — (Pringabaja, Lombok, Lesser Sunda Islands.'i^) Agrees with the female except in the following characters. Form slightly less robust, structure not as heavy. Interocular space narrower, about three-fifths as wide as that between the similar ocellar spots. Tegmina and wings decidedly more elongate, extending distinctly further beyond the abdominal apex than in any female before us. Supra-anal plate decidedly more delicate in structure, subchitinous, more produced, without medio-longitudinal carinula and with distal margin more 'evenly convex mesad, not broadly flattened. Cerci short, stout proximad, dorsal surface weakly convex, ventral surface more strongly convex proximad; first eight joints brief, with lateral margins narrowly compressed, tapering rather sharply to slender ninth and tenth joints, the ninth twice as long, the tenth three times as long, as one of the more proximal joints. Meso-dextrad, from below, an elongate oval, delicate, subchitinous plate is directed dorsad in the anal chamber, tapering evenly ■distad to the acute apex." Subgenital plate springing from bases of cerci, small but broad and little produced, distal margin subsinuato-convex. Styles absent.
Measurements {in millimeters)
& Pringabaja, Lombok .... Miami, Florida (53) 16.3-23 4-8-5-8 5-9-7-6 13.6-19 5.6-7
The extremes of size in the entire series before us, are shown by the females measured above.
SI* In some specimens, the median carinula and this trace of emargination are obsolete.
•■"5 This specimen, from the Fruhstorfer material, was taken in April, 1896, and is now in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences.
3"> This is only a portion of the complex concealed genitalia, which here can not be further discussed without damaginj>; the specimen. Coloration. — (Intensive.) Shining blackish brown. Head, from vertex to clypeus, this color; ocellar spots, genae and clypeus, buffy. Limbs, proximad, suffused ochraceous-buff ; tibiae and tarsi russet, the latter paler. Tegmina translucent, blackish chestnut brown; marginal field ochraceous-buff, wholly, or in part, heavily suffused with blackish chestnut brown, cingulate costal margin blackish chestnut brown. Abdomen with dorsal surface dark brown, deepening caudad; ventral surface polished, broadly margined with blackish brown, shading rapidly into brilliant, suffused cinnamon rufous in large mesal portion. Pronotum shining blackish brown, with marginal traces of buffy latero-cephalad. In specimens of the maximum recessive coloration this pale area forms a marginal band, moderately broad cephalad and continued along the lateral margins of the pronotum to near the laterocaudal angles, while the tegmina are transparent, light ochraceousbuff, with numerous microscopic dots of brown^^^ and humeral trunk blackish brown proximad. In such specimens the dark portion of the head sometimes shows a slightly paler transverse marking, between the points of juncture of the eyes and ocellar areas. Every degree of variation, from the maximum intensive to the maximum recessive type of coloration, occurs. ^^'^
General coloration of immature examples, deep chestnut brown to blackish chestnut brown. ^'^ Head, pronotum, mesonotum, metanotum, median segment, first two dorsal abdominal segments and entral surface polished, with very minute, scattered, microscopic punctae on head and dorsal polished portions. Remaining dorsal portion of abdomen microscopically finely shagreenous, showing raised and polished points on third segment and fewer raised points on the remaining segments. Head of general coloration, shading to slightly paler on the occiput, cingulate margins
'■' I'nder the microscope these dots are seen to be arranged in hnes between the tegminal veins, each dot representing pigmentation of a minute pit. These lines of dots, become more and more broken distad and disappear before the distal portion of the tegmen is reached. To the naked eye, the effect is of a moderate proximal suffusion of the transparent tegmina.
•■"** The single Malaysian male before us is of the maxinmm recessive type of coloration.
319 Occasional specimens are found of paler general coloration. These represent individuals which, when killed, had but recently reached maturity and had not >et attained their full coloration.
of pronotum also frequently slightly paler. The ocellar spots are not as large as in the adult condition, but still prominent, only disappearing in the early instars. Ventral surface shading to buckthorn brown with a tawny tinge.
The eggs of this species are inclosed in a transparent membrane, which is found within the abdomen. The mass has the general appearance of a partially formed ootheca.
In addition to the large series from the United States, we have examined nearly two hundred specimens of this species, chiefly from the West Indies and Mexico, without finding a single male, adult or immature, from the American continent.^-" The Malaysian male before us has proportionately decidedly longer organs of flight than any female at hand, and the sex may have very diff^erent habits from the females, which, with the young, we have often found burrowing on the surface of the ground, in dust or sand under rocks, boards or other debris. The absence of even immature males, among the very large American series of immature specimens before us, may possibly indicate parthenogenesis; prolonged study of living material must be undertaken before this problem can be solved.
The species is abundant in peninsular Florida and the Brownsville region of Texas. It has been found established as far north as Jacksonville, Gainesville and Cedar Keys, Florida; New Orleans, Louisiana, and San Antonio, Texas. Elsewhere in the United States the species has occasionally become temporarily established in green-houses and places similarly artificially heated during cold weather.^-'
Specimens Examined: 126; 55 females and 71 immature females.
Jacksonville, Florida, (T. J. Priddey), l 9, [Hebard Cln.].
St. Augustine, Fla., VIII, 19, 1905, (Rehn and Hebard), i 9, [Hebard Cln.].
Palatka, F!a., VIII, 19, 1915, (Rehn and Hebard), i 9, [Hebard Cln.].
Gainesville, Fla., VIII, 17, 1905, (Rehn and Hebard; in house), i 9 , [Hebard Cln.].
Cedar Keys, Fla., VIII, 15, 1905, (Rehn and Hebard), 3 9, [Hebard Cln.].
Tampa, Fla., I, 17, 1904, (Hebard), i juv. 9, [Hebard Cln.].
Punta Gorda, Fla., XI, 13, 191 1, (W. T. Davis; under board), i 9, [Hebard Cln.].
3-" Brunner states that not a siii;.i;le male was jjresent in his series of o'er forty s{)eciniens from tropical America, and tliat lie had rcpresentaties of that sex, only anions; those which lielonged to the small condition found in (he luist Indies. Nouw Sst. Jilatt., p. 2.S0, (1.S65).
■*-' See page 269. New Smyrna, Fla., Ill, 1905, (A. X. Caudell; bred adult XI, 1905), i 9, [U. S. Miami, Fla., I, 2S to XI, 16, 1903 to 1916, (Hebard; for Hebard; Englehardt), 21 9 , 41 juv. 9 , [Hebard Cln. and A. N. S. P.].
Homestead, Fla., VII, 10 to 12, 1912, (Rehn and Hebard; under debris), i 9, [Hebard Cln.].
Jew F"ish, Fla., 'II, 11, 1912, (Hebard; in cracks of sun-baked mud), I 9, [Hebard Cln.].
Long Key, Fla.. Ill, 13 and 17, 1910, (Hebard; two under dry fibers at base of petioles of cocoanut palm, others under debris), 5 juv. 9 , [Hebard Cln. and A. X.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Hebard, M. 1917. The Blattidae of North America. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 2. Philadelphia, USA

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Pycnoscelus surinamensis (Linnaeus)
1767. [Blatta] surinamensis Linnaeus, Syst. Nat., Ed. XII. p. 687. [Surinam.] fig. I. (Detailed diagnosis.)
Canal Zone, Panama, i<;o7, (Busck), i 9.
This is a circumtropical species, widely distributed throughout tropical America.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Hebard, M. 1919. The Blattidae of Panama. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 4. Philadelphia, USA

Comprehensive Description

provided by Memoirs of the American Entomological Society
Pycnoscelus surinamensis (Linnaeus)
1767. [Blatta] surinamensis Linnaeus, Syst. Nat., Ed. XIL p. 687. [Surinam.]
This species is discussed on page 193; the adventive material before us is listed below.
Cromwell, Connecticut. IH, i, 191 1, (B. H. Walden; from greenhouse), 2 9, [Hebard Cln.].
New York, New York, XL 1913. (^^'• Beutenmuller; reptile house of N. Y. Zool. Soc), 6 9,1 juv. 9. [A. N. S. P.].
Rutherford, New Jersey, XL 19, 1915, (H. B. Weiss). 49,2 juy. 9 , [A. N. S. P.].
Washington. District of Columbia. II, 1888, I 9 , 4 juv. 9 , [Hebard Cln.].
The species readily establishes itself in earth or debris and dust indoors, far north of its normal range, ^^'^ provided the temperature is kept high during the cold months.
The specimens from New York and Rutherford are all very dark, the pale cephalic marking on the pronotum being obsolete mesad and only very narrowly indicated laterad at the cephalic angles.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
bibliographic citation
Hebard, M. 1917. The Blattidae of North America. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society vol. 2. Philadelphia, USA

Surinam cockroach

provided by wikipedia EN

The Surinam cockroach or greenhouse cockroach[1] (Pycnoscelus surinamensis) is a species of burrowing cockroach. It is a common plant pest endemic to the Indomalayan realm that has spread to tropical and into subtropical regions around the world, and in isolated populations to temperate climates where protective habitat such as greenhouses provide shelter for individuals inadvertently shipped in the soil of plants. Its populations are almost exclusively female, and it reproduces through parthenogenesis, having evolved several clonal strains from its sexual progenitor P. indicus.

Description

Nymph

Adults are around 18–25 mm (0.71–0.98 in) in length, and have dark brown to black bodies with shiny paler brown wings.[2][3] The front edge of the pronotum (head shield) has a pale white band.[4] While males are rarely produced, male adults have longer wings than females, completely covering the abdomen,[5] although both sexes are poor flyers.[6][7]

Nymphs are around 4.5 mm (0.18 in) long at birth, translucent white with orange-brown mandibles and spines, and darker eye spots than the rest of the head.[5] The exoskeleton gradually hardens on exposure to air, becoming a glossy brown in 5 to 6 hours, while its underside and legs remain translucent.[5] Older nymphs develop shiny black anterior abdominal segments, and roughened, dull black posterior segments.[2]

Range

P. surinamensis originated in the Indomalayan region and is now cosmopolitan, found around the world in tropical regions, extending into subtropical regions, and temporarily establishing populations in protective habitats in temperate climates, particularly in greenhouses (also called glasshouses) or other areas heated during colder periods.[2][6][8] It can be spread to greenhouses with shipments of tropical plants.[8] In the United States it is common in the southeastern region from North Carolina to Texas, in addition to temporary populations in more temperate climates.[2]

Habitat

P. surinamensis is a burrowing cockroach, commonly burrowing in loose soil, humus, mould, compost piles and lawn thatch, or hiding beneath rocks, rotten branches, trash and other debris.[2][4][5][9] It is considered peridomestic, found living only near human constructions or crops in a 1996 study, and may be considered synanthropic.[9] It has a relatively high rate of cutaneous water loss compared to non-burrowing species of cockroaches, and is nearly exclusively associated with moist soil across its range.[1]

Pest

While the species is occasionally found inside homes, it is not a common household pest.[4] It is a plantation and garden pest in tropical regions, and can be especially problematic in heated greenhouses, where large numbers can hide by day and emerge at night, gnawing the softer parts of plants.[4][10] It is thought to be transferred into homes and businesses in potted plants or mulch used for potted plants.[2][4]

Indoor infestations can often be controlled using sprays or granules on potted plants.[4] Outdoor treatment should focus on infested locations such as wood piles, mulch, and foundation plantings, and a residual barrier spray may be useful around houses.[4]

Parthenogenesis

An unusual aspect of P. surinamensis is that the species reproduces parthenogenetically, a form of asexual reproduction in which embryos develop from unfertilized eggs. P. surinamensis reproduce by thelytokous parthenogenesis, a type of parthenogenesis in which offspring are almost exclusively female clones. Thelytokous parthenesis is known in about 1% of known animal species.[11]

Optional thelkytokous parthenogenesis occurs in several cockroach species when females are isolated from males, including in the common domestic pests Blatta orientalis, Blattella germanica, and Periplaneta americana, but in P. surinamensis it is obligatory parthenogenesis, its sole means of reproduction. Earlier taxonomy treated P. surinamensis as a species with both sexual and asexual forms, reproducing asexually in some populations, but sexually in other populations.[2][12][13] Roth in 1967 applied the name P. indicus (Fabricius, 1775) to the sexually-reproducing taxon from which the parthenogenetic form P. surinamensis is descended.[1][13] While P. surinamensis is cosmopolitan, P. indicus is endemic to the Indomalayasian region and adjacent parts of Southeast Asia, and spread just to Hawaiian and Mauritian islands.[13]

In P. surinamensis, males are rarely born and are nonfunctional with frequency varying by population. An Australian colony being studied produced several, while none were seen in a Florida colony in over 15 years of study. In a parthenogenetic moth the rate varied by how long a population was stabilized, which suggests the possibility that Australian colony may have developed parthenogenesis more recently than the Florida colony.[13]

P. surinamensis has at least 21 diploid clones, born independently from sexual females, meaning the thelytokous parthenogenesis has evolved repeatedly.[6] There are also 11 known triploid clones, produced by backcrosses between clones and P. indicus.[6] Different clones have established populations throughout the species' range, with at least ten different clone populations present in the United States alone.[6][13]

Obligatory parthenogenesis was known only in P. surinamensis until 2003, when it was reported in a form of the species Phyllodromica subaptera.[6] Asexual forms of P. subaptera, spread through most Mediterranean countries, are morphologically indistinguishable from the sexual form, found only on the Iberian peninsula, suggesting the trait was relatively recently acquired.[6]

Gestation and birth

Reproduction is usually ovoviviparous, the ootheca carried internally during gestation until nymphs hatch within the body and are delivered, usually at night or in darkness.[5] Occasionally stress or other factors may result in premature release of the ootheca, which can result in non-viability of the eggs.[5] The ootheca itself measures 9x3.5x2.5 mm, housing 30-36 eggs in two rows of alternately spaced segments. Remains of the egg case are expelled around the time the nymphs are being born, sometimes pulled out with the hind limbs, and the ootheca fragments are usually quickly devoured by the newborn nymphs.[5]

Parasite Host

P. surinamensis acts as the intermediate host for the parasitic roundworms Oxyspirura mansoni and Oxyspirura parvorum, which infect the eyes of poultry.[2]

O. mansoni, known as the chicken eyeworm among other names,[5] can cause eye problems ranging from mild conjunctivitis to severe ophthalmia and serious vision impairment in its final hosts, which include chickens, turkeys, guineafowl and peafowl.[2][8][14] Its life cycle involves eggs passing through a bird's lachrymal duct, being swallowed and passed in the bird's feces, a P. surinamensis cockroach eating the feces, larvae emerging in the cockroach, the bird eating the cockroach, and finally the eye worm larvae migrating up the oesophagus and pharynx to the bird's eye.[14] While O. mansoni is not present in Europe, it is present in many areas of the world, particularly the tropical and subtropical environments where P. surinamensis is permanently established.[14]

References

  1. ^ a b c Gade, B.; Parker, E. D. (1997). "The effect of life cycle stage and genotype on desiccation tolerance in the colonizing parthenogenetic cockroach Pycnoscelus surinamensis and its sexual ancestor P. indicus". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 10 (4): 479–493. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10040479.x. ISSN 1010-061X. S2CID 86499047.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Mullen, Gary R.; Durden, Lance A. (27 September 2002). Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Academic Press. pp. 37, 42. ISBN 978-0-08-053607-1.
  3. ^ Alford, David V. (30 May 2012). Pests of Ornamental Trees, Shrubs and Flowers. Manson Publishing. p. 23. ISBN 978-1-84076-628-8.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Suiter, DR; Koehler, PG. "ENY241/MG229: Surinam Cockroach, Pycnoscelus surinamensis". Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Schwabe, CW (March 1949). "Observations on the life history of Pycnoscelus surinamensis (Linn.), the intermediate host of the chicken eyeworm in Hawaii" (PDF). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society. 13 (3): 433–436.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Bell, WJ; Roth, LM; Nalepa, CA (2007). Cockroaches: Ecology, Behavior, and Natural History (PDF). JHU Press. pp. 121–122. ISBN 978-0-8018-8616-4. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  7. ^ Hebard, Morgan (1917). "The Blattidae of North America north of the Mexican boundary". Memoirs of the American Entomological Society (2): 193–197. (The article comprises the whole issue.)
  8. ^ a b c US Department of Agriculture, ed. (2004). Climate and Man: Part One (Reprinted from the 1941 ed.). Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific. p. 524. ISBN 978-1-4102-1538-3.
  9. ^ a b Grandcolas, P.; Dejean, A.; Deleporte, P. (1996). "The invading parthenogenetic cockroach: a natural history comment on Parker and Niklasson's study". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 9 (6): 1023–1026. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9061023.x. ISSN 1010-061X.
  10. ^ Schal, C; Hamilton, RL (1990). "Integrated suppression of synanthropic cockroaches" (PDF). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 521–551. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.002513. PMID 2405773.
  11. ^ White, Michael J.D. (1984). "Chromosomal Mechanisms in Animal Reproduction". Bolletino di Zoologia. 51 (1–2): 1–23. doi:10.1080/11250008409439455. ISSN 0373-4137.
  12. ^ Roth, Louis M (17 July 1967). "Sexual Isolation in Parthenogenetic Pycnoscelus surinamensis and Application of the Name Pycnoscelus indicus to Its Bisexual Relative (Dictyoptera: Blattaria: Blaberidae: Pycnoscelinae)". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 60 (4): 774–779. doi:10.1093/aesa/60.4.774.
  13. ^ a b c d e Roth, Louis M.; Cohen, Samuel H. (1968). "Chromosomes of the Pycnoscelus Indicus and P. Surinamensis Complex (Blattaria: Blaberidae: Pycnoscelinae)" (PDF). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology. 75 (1): 53–76. doi:10.1155/1968/38048. ISSN 0033-2615.
  14. ^ a b c Taylor, MA; Coop, RL; Wall, RL (13 March 2013). Veterinary Parasitology. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1017–1018. ISBN 978-1-118-68711-6.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Surinam cockroach: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The Surinam cockroach or greenhouse cockroach (Pycnoscelus surinamensis) is a species of burrowing cockroach. It is a common plant pest endemic to the Indomalayan realm that has spread to tropical and into subtropical regions around the world, and in isolated populations to temperate climates where protective habitat such as greenhouses provide shelter for individuals inadvertently shipped in the soil of plants. Its populations are almost exclusively female, and it reproduces through parthenogenesis, having evolved several clonal strains from its sexual progenitor P. indicus.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN