dcsimg

Taxonomic History ( Inglês )

fornecido por Antweb

Extant: 1 valid subspecies

Formica truncorum Fabricius, 1804 PDF: 403 (q.) CZECH REPUBLIC. Palearctic. AntCat AntWiki HOL

Taxonomic history

Subspecies of Formica rufa: Emery & Forel, 1879 PDF: 450; Emery, 1925d PDF: 255; Santschi, 1925g PDF: 351; Karavaiev, 1927d: 282 (in key); Karavaiev, 1927e PDF: 346; Kuznetsov-Ugamsky, 1929a PDF: 21; Karavaiev, 1930b PDF: 149; Karavaiev, 1931e PDF: 217; Arnol'di, 1933a: 604 (in key); Stitz, 1934: 9; Karavaiev, 1936: 247 (redescription); Ceballos, 1956: 320.Status as species: Smith, 1858a PDF: 4; Roger, 1863b PDF: 13; Dalla Torre, 1893 PDF: 214; Bondroit, 1917a PDF: 174 (in key); Bondroit, 1918 PDF: 60; Bondroit, 1920a PDF: 146; Bondroit, 1920b PDF: 300; Betrem, 1926 PDF: 213 (in key); Stärcke, 1926a PDF: 148 (in key); Lomnicki, 1928 PDF: 8; Teranishi, 1932 PDF: 53; Teranishi, 1934b PDF: 38; Stärcke, 1935a PDF: 269; Stitz, 1939: 344; Menozzi, 1939a PDF: 321 (in key); Novák & Sadil, 1941 PDF: 105 (in key); Eidmann, 1941a PDF: 31; Eidmann, 1942a PDF: 253; Holgersen, 1942b PDF: 13; Holgersen, 1943c PDF: 176 (in key); Holgersen, 1944a PDF: 185; Röszler, 1950 PDF: 214; Azuma, 1955 PDF: 80; Betrem, 1960a PDF: 130; Betrem, 1960b: 76 (in key); Dlussky, 1965a PDF: 28; Bernard, 1967a PDF: 307 (redescription); Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Kutter, 1968b: 61; Kutter, 1968c: 206; Pisarski, 1969b: 313; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1970 PDF: 89; Baroni Urbani, 1971c PDF: 223; Collingwood, 1971 PDF: 168; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174 (redescription); Banert & Pisarski, 1972 PDF: 355; Pisarski, 1975: 45; Tarbinsky, 1976 PDF: 192 (redescription); Kutter, 1977c: 274; Arnol'di & Dlussky, 1978: 554 (in key); Collingwood, 1979 PDF: 139; Kupyanskaya, 1980 PDF: 105; Onoyama, 1980a PDF: 200; Kupyanskaya, 1986b PDF: 98; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987a PDF: 60; Agosti & Collingwood, 1987b PDF: 286 (in key); Nilsson & Douwes, 1987: 82; Gösswald, 1989: 21; Kupyanskaya, 1990a: 192; Morisita et al., 1991: 34; Atanassov & Dlussky, 1992: 270; Radchenko, 1994b: 114 (in key); Douwes, 1995: 97; Bolton, 1995b: 205; Poldi et al., 1995: 8; Gallé et al., 1998: 217; Collingwood & Heatwole, 2002 PDF: 15; Czechowski et al., 2002 PDF: 76; Imai et al., 2003 PDF: 58; Karaman & Karaman, 2003 PDF: 52; Radchenko, 2005b PDF: 164; Csosz & Markó, 2005 PDF: 232; Bračko, 2006 PDF: 148; Markó et al., 2006 PDF: 68; Petrov, 2006 PDF: 112 (in key); Schultz et al., 2006 PDF: 205; Bračko, 2007 PDF: 20; Radchenko, 2007 PDF: 36; Seifert, 2007: 317; Werner & Wiezik, 2007 PDF: 144; Zryanin & Zryanina, 2007 PDF: 233; Casevitz-Weulersse & Galkowski, 2009 PDF: 483; Lapeva-Gjonova et al., 2010 PDF: 55; Boer, 2010: 27; Csosz et al., 2011 PDF: 59; Czechowski et al., 2012: 199; Guénard & Dunn, 2012 PDF: 32; Kiran & Karaman, 2012 PDF: 11; Borowiec, 2014 PDF: 79 (see note in bibliography); Bračko et al., 2014 PDF: 19; Bharti et al., 2016 PDF: 27; Lebas et al., 2016: 178; Radchenko, 2016: 289; Seifert, 2018: 330.Senior synonym of Formica truncorum menozzii: Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174; Bolton, 1995b: 205; Imai et al., 2003 PDF: 58; Radchenko, 2016: 290.Senior synonym of Formica rufa rufotruncicola: Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174; Tarbinsky, 1976 PDF: 192; Bolton, 1995b: 205; Imai et al., 2003 PDF: 58; Radchenko, 2016: 290.Senior synonym of Formica simulata: Imai et al., 2003 PDF: 58.Senior synonym of Formica truncorum staegeri: Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174; Bolton, 1995b: 205; Radchenko, 2016: 290.Synonym of Formica truncicola: Roger, 1863b PDF: 13; Emery & Forel, 1879 PDF: 450.[Note: Roger, 1863b PDF: 13, and Emery & Forel, 1879 PDF: 450, give Formica truncicola as senior synonym, but Formica truncorum has priority.].Senior synonym of Formica truncicola: Bondroit, 1918 PDF: 60; Emery, 1925d PDF: 255; Betrem, 1926 PDF: 213; Stärcke, 1926a PDF: 148; Lomnicki, 1928 PDF: 8; Arnol'di, 1933a: 603; Karavaiev, 1936: 247; Betrem, 1960a PDF: 130 (in text); Bernard, 1967a PDF: 307; Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Baroni Urbani, 1971c PDF: 223; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174; Pisarski, 1975: 45; Tarbinsky, 1976 PDF: 192; Kutter, 1977c: 274; Onoyama, 1980a PDF: 200; Bolton, 1995b: 205; Gallé et al., 1998: 217; Czechowski et al., 2002 PDF: 76; Radchenko, 2007 PDF: 36; Casevitz-Weulersse & Galkowski, 2009 PDF: 483; Czechowski et al., 2012: 199; Radchenko, 2016: 289.Senior synonym of Formica truncicolopratensis: Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Bernard, 1967a PDF: 307; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174; Pisarski, 1975: 45; Bolton, 1995b: 205; Czechowski et al., 2002 PDF: 76; Imai et al., 2003 PDF: 58; Czechowski et al., 2012: 199; Radchenko, 2016: 289.Material of the unavailable name Formica rufa truncicola stitzi referred here by Dlussky, 1967a PDF: 81; Dlussky & Pisarski, 1971 PDF: 174; Imai et al., 2003 PDF: 58.
licença
cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
direitos autorais
California Academy of Sciences
citação bibliográfica
AntWeb. Version 8.45.1. California Academy of Science, online at https://www.antweb.org. Accessed 15 December 2022.
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
Antweb

Diagnostic Description ( Inglês )

fornecido por Plazi (legacy text)

Formica truncorum, Fabr. Syst. Fiez. 403. 31 [[queen]].

Formica truncicola, Nylander [[queen]]?

Hab. Moravia.

licença
not applicable
citação bibliográfica
Smith, F., Catalogue of the hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part VI. Formicidae., pp. -
autor
Smith, F.
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
Plazi (legacy text)

Diagnostic Description ( Inglês )

fornecido por Plazi (legacy text)

Records

(Map 70): Bulgaria ( Atanassov and Dlusskij 1992 ); Danubian Plain ( Wesselinoff 1973 ); Western Predbalkan: Belogradchik ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 , Hubenov et al. 1998 ), Bleshnitsa ( Hubenov et al. 1998 ); Western Stara Planina Mts: Berkovitsa ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 ); Eastern Stara Planina Mts:under Razboyna peak ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 ); Osogovska Planina Mt.: Hisarlaka (Kyustendil) ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 ); Krupnik-Sandanski-Petrich Valley: Sandanski ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 , Hubenov et al. 1998 ); Sturgach Mt. ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 ); Western Rhodopi Mts: Eleshnitsa ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 ); Northern Black Sea coast: Kranevo ( Atanassov and Vassileva 1976 ).

licença
not applicable
citação bibliográfica
Lapeva-Gjonova, Albena, 2010, Catalogue of the ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Bulgaria, ZooKeys, pp. 1-124, vol. 62
autor
Lapeva-Gjonova, Albena
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
Plazi (legacy text)

Strunkameise ( Alemão )

fornecido por wikipedia DE

Die Strunkameise (Formica truncorum) aus der Unterfamilie der Schuppenameisen (Formicinae) gehört zur Gattung der Waldameisen (Formica).

Merkmale

Kopf und Mesosoma sind rostrot bis rötlichgelb gefärbt. Auch der erste Tergit der Gaster ist ausgedehnt rostrot gefärbt, die restliche Gaster weist eine braunschwarze bis schwarze Färbung auf. Die schwarzen Flecken auf Pronotum und Mesonotum fehlen oder erscheinen nur ganz undeutlich. Auch dem Kopf fehlt die schwarze Färbung gänzlich. Das Mesosoma und die Gaster zeigen eine starke, goldgelbe Behaarung und der Kopf trägt am Hinterhaupt einen Kranz abstehender Haare. Auch an der Kopfunterseite sind abstehende Haare vorhanden. Die Länge der Arbeiterinnen beträgt 3,5 bis 9 Millimeter.[1]

Verbreitung und Lebensraum

Das Verbreitungsgebiet erstreckt sich über ganz Europa bis in den Nordosten Asiens. Diese Art ist in Nordeuropa recht häufig, weiter südlich allerdings nur in Gebirgslagen anzutreffen. Sie lebt an warmen Plätzen auf trockenen und sandigen Böden, es sind in Polen aber auch Siedlungen in Torfmooren bekannt. Man findet die Kolonien an südseitigen Waldrändern oder auf ausgedehnten, karg bewachsenen Lichtungen.[2]

Lebensweise

Die Kolonien werden sozialparasitär bei Sklavenameisen (Serviformica) gegründet und die Staaten können einige Jahre monogyn bleiben. Mit der Zeit geht die Gemeinschaft durch Adoption von Jungköniginnen in eine Polygynie über. Häufig bilden sich dann auch polydome Nestgemeinschaften aus. Die Strunkameise ist bei weitem nicht so stark an ihren Standort gebunden wie andere Waldameisen und es kommt öfter zu Nestumzügen, beispielsweise bei zu viel Schatten, oder um Nahrungskonkurrenten auszuweichen. Die Nester verbleiben oft nur wenige Jahre an ihrem Standplatz.[2] Die Staaten sind eher klein und umfassen nur einige zehntausend Arbeiterinnen. Die Strunkameise hält von Oktober bis März Winterruhe und schwärmt an warmen Tagen zwischen Ende Juni und Mitte August.

Nahrung

Als Nahrung dienen überwiegend Insekten und Honigtau.

Nestbau

Die klassischen Hügelnester aus Pflanzenmaterial sind klein und unscheinbar. Sie sind auch unregelmäßiger geformt als die größeren Nester der Roten Waldameise (Formica rufa) oder der Kahlrückigen Waldameise (Formica polyctena). Meist werden die unregelmäßigen Kuppeln an der Südseite von Baumstammen angelegt, manchmal auch an größeren Grasbüscheln. Als Materialien dienen größtenteils Baumnadeln, kleine Äste und trockenes Gras.

Systematik

Es werden keine Unterarten der Strunkameise (Formica truncorum) mehr unterschieden, ehemalige, nun synonymisierte Unterarten sind[3]:

  • Formica truncorum finzii Stitz, 1939[4]
  • Formica truncorum frontalis Santschi, 1919[5]
  • Formica truncorum menozzii Stitz, 1939[6]
  • Formica truncorum truncorum Fabricius, 1804[7]

Einzelnachweise

  1. Dieter Otto: Die Roten Waldameisen. 3., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Westarp Wissenschaften, 2005, ISBN 3-89432718-9, 192 Seiten, 77 Abbildungen.
  2. a b Abraham A. Mabelis, J. Paul Chardon: Survival of the trunk ant (Formica truncorum Fabricius, 1804; Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a fragmented habitat. In: Myrmecologische Nachrichten. Band 9, Januar 2006, S. 1–11 (researchgate.net [abgerufen am 28. März 2020]).
  3. Bernhard Seifert: A taxonomic revision of the Palaearctic members of the Formica rufa group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – the famous mound-building red wood ants. 2021, doi:10.25849/MYRMECOL.NEWS_031:133 (myrmecologicalnews.org [abgerufen am 24. April 2022]).
  4. Formica truncorum finzii. Fauna Europaea, abgerufen am 25. Mai 2007.
  5. Formica truncorum frontalis. Fauna Europaea, abgerufen am 25. Mai 2007.
  6. Hermann Stitz: Hautflüger oder Hymenoptera. I: Ameisen oder Formicidae. In: Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meersteile nach ihren Merkmalen und nach ihrer Lebensweise. Band 37, 1939, S. 374.
  7. Formica truncorum truncorum. Fauna Europaea, abgerufen am 25. Mai 2007.
 title=
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Autoren und Herausgeber von Wikipedia
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia DE

Strunkameise: Brief Summary ( Alemão )

fornecido por wikipedia DE

Die Strunkameise (Formica truncorum) aus der Unterfamilie der Schuppenameisen (Formicinae) gehört zur Gattung der Waldameisen (Formica).

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Autoren und Herausgeber von Wikipedia
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia DE

Formica truncorum ( Inglês )

fornecido por wikipedia EN

Formica truncorum is a species of wood ant from the genus Formica. It is distributed across a variety of locations worldwide, including central Europe and Japan. Workers can range from 3.5 to 9.0mm and are uniquely characterized by small hairs covering their entire bodies. Like all other ants, F. truncorum is eusocial and demonstrates many cooperative behaviors that are unique to its order. Colonies are either monogynous, with one queen, or polygynous, with many queens, and these two types of colonies differ in many characteristics.

Range and habitat

F. truncorum is located in many places worldwide, such as northern Japan, the Jura Mountains and many regions from Italy to Norway. The colonies, which can be polygynous and often polydomous (where several nests are occupied by one colony), are spread out in regions of woodland borders, where the ants will make their nests in tree stumps.[1]

Morphology

F. truncorum ants are characterized by a grey-brown gaster and bright yellow-red head and thorax. The smaller workers are normally darker in color. They can be distinguished from other species of Formica by the small erect setae covering their entire body. Workers can range in size from 3.5 to 9.0 mm.[2]

Behaviour

Eusociality

F. truncorum is a member of the insect order Hymenoptera, which contains the majority of the eusocial insects. F. truncorum demonstrates some characteristics specific to eusociality. There is cooperative rearing of young, which is thought to provide a sort of 'life insurance' for the female's brood.[3] If the female were to die during the rearing process, others would take her place to finish raising the brood. The value of this cooperation may justify the cost. Another defining characteristic of eusociality is the evolution of specific castes within the species, some of which are sterile.[3] Castes in F. truncorum include the drones, the winged male ants with the sole purpose of reproducing, the queen, who sheds her wings after the nuptial flight, and the sterile workers which can vary in size depending on specialized tasks.[4]

Eusocial behaviour is thought to have evolved as a result of kin selection within monogamous colonies. In multiply mated colonies, the relatedness between siblings is lowered, which diminishes the benefits of altruistic behaviour within the colony. Only in monogamous colonies would the relatedness between individuals in a colony remain high, which could allow the benefits of eusociality to be justified by Hamilton's rule.[3]

Cuticular kin recognition

The kin selection that is necessary for eusociality to evolve would require a signal that allows for related members of a species to recognize each other. A study [5] has indicated that in F. truncorum this signal may be the hydrocarbon profile located on the cuticle of each ant. Further examination of these hydrocarbon chains has shown that many contain chains longer than 34 carbons, and while there is enough similarity between cuticles to recognize members of the same colony, they are still diverse enough to be distinct between colonies.[6] Ants which are genetically similar have similar hydrocarbon profiles, which could allow kin to recognize one another through this similarity. Studies have shown that there is a correlation between the cuticular hydrocarbon profile and the dispersal tendencies of particular colonies.[7]

Foraging

The social divisions of the eusocial ants can allow for the creation of subsets of populations with specific duties assigned to them, which can be applied to a variety of tasks, including foraging. Foraging will usually involve the discovery of small caches of food, with some of them being persistent and reliable and others being very transient. This difference in reliability causes the foragers of F. truncorum to divide into two groups with a specific task.[8] One group will patrol the reliable sites, and the other will scan empty food sites in search of new sources of food. Upon discovering a new source, the foragers will recruit from the nest and will not recruit any foragers already outside. Not all of the recruited foragers will carry food back to the nest, suggesting that some are recruited for defense of the site.

The foraging habits of F. truncorum were also observed by placing baits near foraging areas and then observing the ability of the ants to recruit additional worker to transport the food back to the nest. This process of recruitment is done in a simple manner, where workers that have discovered food will lay a pheromone trail that connects the food to the nest, and additional workers will detect and follow the scent of this trail. Trails that are currently leading towards additional food will have pheromone trails that are more recently placed, and will also likely have a stronger scent due to multiple ants laying down pheromones, which allows the workers to quickly react to changes in the direction of the food source by following the newest and strongest trails. F. truncorum has demonstrated an interested characteristic of its foraging ability where it can successfully follow a trail in light but not in darkness.[9] This suggests a visual component in addition to the pheromone trail that is not fully understood.

Sex ratio conflict

Studies of F. truncorum have shown that the sex ratio varies between being female-biased or male-biased depending on how many times the queen has mated.[10] In cases where the queen is singly-mated, the relatedness between the workers remains high and the ratio is female-biased. This is thought to occur because of haplodiploidy, which causes the females to be more related to their own sisters than to any potential offspring. This increased relatedness between siblings causes the female workers to skew the sex ratio in their favor. In cases where the queen is multiply mated, this relatedness between siblings is lost, and the queen retains control of the sex ratio, which causes it to be male-biased.

Effects on fitness

On average, multiply mated queens have a 37% higher fitness than singly mated queens[11] It is proposed that singly-mated queens remain in the population because the benefits of multiple-mating may have been balanced by the costs of increased predation and risk to disease transmission. The benefits of multiple-mating also decline as it becomes more numerous in the population. Another suggested possibility is that some queens are unable to find a second mate and remain singly-mated.

Female preference

It was observed in F. truncorum that when two males had their ability to sire offspring compared, one of the two would consistently create more progeny.[12] In spite of this, there was no evidence to support the idea that one male would be particularly better at creating more offspring than the other. This indicates that the female is able to store different amounts of sperm from separate males, which would then result in one male producing significantly more offspring.

Monogynous vs. polygynous colonies

Resource allocation

The resource allocation of F. truncorum ants to the formation of new reproductives was compared between monogynous and polygynous colonies by measuring the colony's productivity and mating structure.[13] Monogynous colonies with a high productivity would have excess resources, and they invested these excess resources into the formation of more reproductives. Monogynous colonies typically had a higher ratio of sexuals per adult worker. When they had excess resources, polygynous colonies did not invest in the formation of more reproductives, indicating that the allocation of resources to the formation of reproductives is controlled by the workers.

Dispersal polymorphism

F. truncorum worker with a scale bar for reference.

The genetic population structure and sociogenetic organization of F. truncorum were compared between monogynous and polygynous colonies by using allele frequency differences between the populations and estimates of relatedness between different subsets of the colony population.[14] The allele frequency differences between subpopulations were significant in the polygynous colonies but not detectable between the subpopulations of the monogynous colonies. This makes sense because the polygynous colonies would be expected to have multiple reproducing females from different genetic backgrounds, which would lead to differences in the allele frequencies of the workers that made up the population. Also, the polygynous colonies usually had queens that were related to their male mates, which was not the case in the monogynous colonies, suggesting a difference in dispersal between the two types. Based on this data, polygynous colonies have limited dispersal and will usually mate within the colony, while the monogynous colonies rely on outbreeding and a higher degree of dispersal.

The propensity to disperse also varies between males and females, with the main effect of this being that females that are less prone to dispersal will be more likely to stay in the colony and switch it from monogynous to polygynous.[15] The ability of the female to leave the colony is affected by its physiological condition, where larger females with greater fat stores will preferentially disperse but smaller females are more likely to remain. Male dispersal is also determined by size, and in the case of both sexes, larger males and females are produced in monogynous colonies in accordance with their greater dispersal.

If there is a wide variation in the size of the queens produced, it is likely that monogynous colonies would not remain monogynous for any long period of time, because smaller daughters would remain and form polygynous colonies. To counteract this, queens produced in monogynous colonies must frequently be large. A study of the heritability of queen size shows that there is a significant degree of heritability in size that a daughter can receive from her mother, allowing for monogynous colonies to predictably produce larger queens that will disperse to form independent colonies.[16]

Unicoloniality

As seen by comparing the relatedness between the queens and their male mates, polygynous colonies will typically mate within the nest. This results in reproduction that is driven by a very limited dispersal where queens will bud off of the main nest to create a large, polydomous colony. While this normally leads to high relatedness between nestmates, and a high degree of genetic structuring within the colony, nests of F. truncorum in Finland were observed to behave differently from this.[17] These nests will shift sites, depending on the time of year, between a nest for the hibernating season and one for the reproductive season. By marking the nests and using microsatellites, researchers found that the relatedness between nestmates in these colonies was almost zero. This indicates the F. truncorum can form unicolonial populations were the workers migrate between genetically different nests.

Nestmate and kin recognition

Monogynous colonies and polygynous colonies have shown differences in how they react to nestmate recognition and queen adoption. Monogynous colonies discriminate against, and will not adopt, any non-nestmate female, while polygynous colonies are much more accepting.[18] Monogynous colonies are not totally enclosed, however, and maintain their single-queen status through high female dispersal and low intranidal breeding. While polygynous colonies are more likely to adopt a non-nestmate female, most of the queens still come from adopted daughters within the colony.

References

  1. ^ "Formica truncorum - AntWiki".
  2. ^ "JAnt: Species: Formica truncorum".
  3. ^ a b c Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R., & West, S. A. (2012). An introduction to behavioral ecology (4th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  4. ^ "Ant Family Castes".
  5. ^ Nielsen, J.; Boomsma, J. J.; Oldham, N. J.; Petersen, H. C.; Morgan, E. D. (1999). "Colony-level and season-specific variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of individual workers in the ant Formica truncorm". Insectes Sociaux. 46 (1): 58–65. doi:10.1007/s000400050113. S2CID 31719855.
  6. ^ Akino, Toshiharu (2006). "Cuticular Hydrocarbons of Formica Truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Description of New Very Long Chained Hydrocarbon Components". Applied Entomology and Zoology. 41 (4): 667–77. doi:10.1303/aez.2006.667.
  7. ^ Johnson, C.; Sundstrom, L. (2012). "Cuticular Chemistry of Two Social Forms in a Facultatively Polygyne Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formica Truncorum)". Annales Zoologici Fennici. 49 (1–2): 1–17. doi:10.5735/086.049.0101. S2CID 86606125.
  8. ^ Sundstrom, L (1993). "Foraging Responses OfFormica Truncorum (Hymenoptera; Formicidae); Exploiting Stable vs Spatially and Temporally Variable Resources". Insectes Sociaux. 40 (2): 147–61. doi:10.1007/bf01240703. S2CID 24513340.
  9. ^ Fortelius, W.; Rosengren, R. (1987). "Trail Communication and Directional Recruitment to Food in Red Wood Ants Formica". Annales Zoologici Fennici. 24: 137–46.
  10. ^ Sundström, L (1994). "Sex ratio bias, relatedness asymmetry and queen mating frequency in ants". Nature. 367 (6460): 266–268. Bibcode:1994Natur.367..266S. doi:10.1038/367266a0. S2CID 4302707.
  11. ^ Sundström, L.; Ratnieks, L. W. (1998). "Sex ratio conflicts, mating frequency, and queen fitness in the ant Formica truncorum". Behavioral Ecology. 9 (2): 116–121. doi:10.1093/beheco/9.2.116.
  12. ^ Keller, Laurent; Sundström, Liselotte; Chapuisat, Michel (1997). "Male Reproductive Success: Paternity Contribution to Queens and Workers in Formica Ants" (PDF). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 41 (1): 11–15. doi:10.1007/s002650050358. S2CID 32540232.
  13. ^ Sundstrom, Liselotte (1995). "Sex Allocation and Colony Maintenance in Monogyne and Polygyne Colonies of Formica Truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): The Impact of Kinship and Mating Structure". The American Naturalist. 146 (2): 182–201. doi:10.1086/285794.
  14. ^ Sundstrom, Liselotte (1993). "Genetic Population Structure and Sociogenetic Organisation in Formica Truncorum (Hymenoptera; Formicidae)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 33 (5): 345–354. doi:10.1007/BF00172934. S2CID 10149107.
  15. ^ Sundstrom, Liselotte (1995). "Dispersal Polymorphism and Physiological Condition of Males and Females in the Ant, Formica Truncorum". Behavioral Ecology. 6 (2): 132–39. doi:10.1093/beheco/6.2.132.
  16. ^ Bargum, Katja; Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Sundstrom, Liselotte (2004). "A Genetic Component to Size in Queens of the Ant, Formica Truncorum". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 57 (1): 9–16. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0836-z. S2CID 41556181.
  17. ^ Elias, Marianne; Rosengren, Rainer; Sundstrom, Liselotte (2005). "Seasonal Polydomy and Unicoloniality in a Polygynous Population of the Red Wood Ant Formica Truncorum". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 57 (4): 339–49. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0864-8. S2CID 8784004.
  18. ^ Sundström, L (1997). "Queen acceptance and nestmate recognition in monogyne and polygyne colonies of the ant Formica truncorum". Animal Behaviour. 53 (3): 499–510. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0300. S2CID 53146363.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia EN

Formica truncorum: Brief Summary ( Inglês )

fornecido por wikipedia EN

Formica truncorum is a species of wood ant from the genus Formica. It is distributed across a variety of locations worldwide, including central Europe and Japan. Workers can range from 3.5 to 9.0mm and are uniquely characterized by small hairs covering their entire bodies. Like all other ants, F. truncorum is eusocial and demonstrates many cooperative behaviors that are unique to its order. Colonies are either monogynous, with one queen, or polygynous, with many queens, and these two types of colonies differ in many characteristics.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia EN

Kännukuklane ( Estônio )

fornecido por wikipedia ET

Kännukuklane (Formica truncorum) on sipelglaste sugukonda kuklase perekonda kuuluv putukas.

Ta on Eestis arvatud III kaitsekategooriasse.

Välislingid

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Vikipeedia autorid ja toimetajad
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia ET

Kännukuklane: Brief Summary ( Estônio )

fornecido por wikipedia ET

Kännukuklane (Formica truncorum) on sipelglaste sugukonda kuklase perekonda kuuluv putukas.

Ta on Eestis arvatud III kaitsekategooriasse.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Vikipeedia autorid ja toimetajad
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia ET

Raudongalvė skruzdėlė ( Lituano )

fornecido por wikipedia LT

Raudongalvė skruzdėlė (Formica truncorum) – vidutinio dydžio, apie 4–9 mm ilgio, skruzdėlėFormica genties [1], Formicinae pošeimio.

Aprašymas

 src=
Raudongalvė skruzdėlė iš arti.

Galvai ir kūneliui būdinga dominuojanti rausva spalva, pilvelis tamsus. Gali parazituoti kitų rūšių skruzdėlių atžvilgiu (F. fusca) arba būti pačios kolonizuotos (F. rufa, F. polycten). Apsigyvena dažniausiai sausose saulėtose vietose, pietinėje pamiškių pusėje, nors jos kartais randamos ir užpelkėjusiuose rajonuose. Kolonijose gyvena keli tūkst. individų su keliomis motinėlėmis, todėl didelių skruzdėlynų, būdingų panašių miško skruzdėlių kolonijose, nestato. Prie kelmų, medžių kamienų paprastai įsirengia nelabai tvarkingus neilgalaikius lizdus.

Paplitimas

Ši skruzdėlių rūšis plačiai paplitusi Šiaurės Europoje bei toliau į Azijos šiaurės rytus. Arčiau Europos pietų sutinkama dažniausiai kalnuotose vietovėse. Gyvena spygliuočių ir mišrių miškų zonose.

Klasifikacija

Šios skruzdėlės priskiriamos grupei miško skruzdėlių, tarp kurių:

Raudongalvės skruzdėlės porūšiai[2]:

  • F. truncorum finzii Stitz, 1939,
  • F. truncorum frontalis Santschi, 1919,
  • F. truncorum truncorum Fabricius, 1804.

Šaltiniai

Vikiteka

Nuorodos

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Vikipedijos autoriai ir redaktoriai
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia LT

Raudongalvė skruzdėlė: Brief Summary ( Lituano )

fornecido por wikipedia LT

Raudongalvė skruzdėlė (Formica truncorum) – vidutinio dydžio, apie 4–9 mm ilgio, skruzdėlėFormica genties , Formicinae pošeimio.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Vikipedijos autoriai ir redaktoriai
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia LT

Stronkmier ( Neerlandês; Flamengo )

fornecido por wikipedia NL

Insecten

De stronkmier (Formica truncorum) is een mierensoort uit de onderfamilie van de schubmieren (Formicinae).[1][2] De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1804 door Fabricius.

Bronnen, noten en/of referenties
Geplaatst op:
13-04-2013
Dit artikel is een beginnetje over biologie. U wordt uitgenodigd om op bewerken te klikken om uw kennis aan dit artikel toe te voegen. Beginnetje
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia-auteurs en -editors
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia NL

Mrówka pniakowa ( Polonês )

fornecido por wikipedia POL
Commons Multimedia w Wikimedia Commons
REF orange.svg
Ten artykuł od 2009-10 zawiera treści, przy których brakuje odnośników do źródeł.
Należy dodać przypisy do treści niemających odnośników do wiarygodnych źródeł.
(Dodanie listy źródeł bibliograficznych lub linków zewnętrznych nie jest wystarczające).
Po wyeliminowaniu niedoskonałości należy usunąć szablon {{Dopracować}} z tego artykułu.

Mrówka pniakowa (Formica truncorum) – gatunek mrówki z podrodziny Formicinae.

Gatunek południowopalearktyczny[2]. W Polsce gatunek ten objęty jest częściową ochroną gatunkową[3][4].

Na gniazdo wybiera martwe pnie ściętych lub ułamanych drzew. Występuje w lasach iglastych lub mieszanych. Nie buduje dużych kopców tak jak pozostałe mrówki z grupy rudych leśnych mrówek. W gnieździe znajduje się kilkadziesiąt tysięcy robotnic oraz kilka królowych. Nowe gniazda powstają przez podział istniejącego lub czasowe pasożytnictwo na innym gatunku.

Ubarwienie czerwonobrunatne, odwłok ciemny. Widoczne małe włoski na całym ciele. Robotnice mają wielkość od 4 (kasta zbieraczek) do 7 mm (kasta pozostająca w gnieździe), natomiast królowa około 8–9 mm.

Loty godowe odbywa się w lipcu i sierpniu[2].

Zobacz też

Przypisy

  1. Formica truncorum, w: Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ang.).
  2. a b Radchenko A., Czechowska W., Czechowski W.: Klucze do oznaczania owadów Polski. Część XXIV Błonkówki – Hymenoptera Zeszyt 63 Mrówki – Formicidae. Toruń: Polskie Towarzystwo Entomologiczne, 2004.
  3. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 6 października 2014 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej zwierząt (Dz. U. z 2014 r., poz. 1348). [dostęp 2014-10-08].
  4. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 16 grudnia 2016 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej zwierząt (Dz. U. z 2016 r., poz. 2183). [dostęp 2017-01-16]..
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Autorzy i redaktorzy Wikipedii
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia POL

Mrówka pniakowa: Brief Summary ( Polonês )

fornecido por wikipedia POL

Mrówka pniakowa (Formica truncorum) – gatunek mrówki z podrodziny Formicinae.

Gatunek południowopalearktyczny. W Polsce gatunek ten objęty jest częściową ochroną gatunkową.

Na gniazdo wybiera martwe pnie ściętych lub ułamanych drzew. Występuje w lasach iglastych lub mieszanych. Nie buduje dużych kopców tak jak pozostałe mrówki z grupy rudych leśnych mrówek. W gnieździe znajduje się kilkadziesiąt tysięcy robotnic oraz kilka królowych. Nowe gniazda powstają przez podział istniejącego lub czasowe pasożytnictwo na innym gatunku.

Ubarwienie czerwonobrunatne, odwłok ciemny. Widoczne małe włoski na całym ciele. Robotnice mają wielkość od 4 (kasta zbieraczek) do 7 mm (kasta pozostająca w gnieździe), natomiast królowa około 8–9 mm.

Loty godowe odbywa się w lipcu i sierpniu.

 src=

Robotnica

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Autorzy i redaktorzy Wikipedii
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia POL

Formica truncorum ( Português )

fornecido por wikipedia PT

Formica truncorum é uma espécie de formiga do gênero Formica, pertencente à subfamília Formicinae.[1]

Referências

  1. «Formica truncorum». Sistema Global de Informação sobre Biodiversidade (em inglês). Consultado em 24 de agosto de 2019
 title=
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia PT

Formica truncorum: Brief Summary ( Português )

fornecido por wikipedia PT

Formica truncorum é uma espécie de formiga do gênero Formica, pertencente à subfamília Formicinae.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia PT

Красноголовый муравей ( Russo )

fornecido por wikipedia русскую Википедию
Подцарство: Эуметазои
Без ранга: Первичноротые
Без ранга: Линяющие
Без ранга: Panarthropoda
Надкласс: Шестиногие
Класс: Насекомые
Надотряд: Hymenopterida
Инфраотряд: Жалящие
Надсемейство: Formicoidea
Семейство: Муравьи
Подсемейство: Формицины
Триба: Formicini
Род: Формика
Вид: Красноголовый муравей
Международное научное название

Formica truncorum Fabricius, 1804

Wikispecies-logo.svg
Систематика
на Викивидах
Commons-logo.svg
Изображения
на Викискладе
ITIS 576945NCBI 72783EOL 471271

Красноголовый муравей[1] (лат. Formica truncorum) — вид средних по размеру муравьёв рода Formica из подсемейства Formicinae (Formicidae).

Распространение

Северная Евразия: встречаются в лесных биотопах от Европы до Сибири, Средней Азии и Дальнего Востока. Монголия и северо-западный Китай[2][3].

Описание

Длина тела самок около 1 см, рабочих от 4,2 до 7,5 мм. От близких видов рода отличаются почти полностью красноватой головой. Брюшко буровато-чёрное, грудка красновато-бурая. Всё тело покрыто многочисленными прямыми отстоящими волосками. Встречается на опушках, полянах и вырубках в широколиственных лесах и остепненных участках. Муравейники напоминают гнёзда рыжих лесных муравьёв, это небольшие насыпные кучи из растительных остатков около пней и мёртвой древесины, высота гнёзд до 30 см[2][3].

  • Formica truncorum dead worker.JPG
  • Подвиды
    • Formica truncorum finzii Stitz, 1939
    • Formica truncorum frontalis Santschi, 1919
    • Formica truncorum truncorum Fabricius, 1804

Охранный статус

Включён в Красную книгу Кемеровской области в статусе редкого вида (3-я категория, редкий вид)[4]. Включён в Красную книгу Челябинской области[1].

См. также

Примечания

  1. 1 2 Аннотированный перечень редких и находящихся под угрозой исчезновения видов беспозвоночных животных, особо охраняемых в пределах России // 2003* Россия* Красный список особо охраняемых редких и находящихся под угрозой исчезновения животных и растений. (2-й выпуск). Часть 2. Беспозвоночные животные (Бюллетень Красной книги, 2/2004 (2008)) / отв. ред. В. Е. Присяжнюк. — М.: Лаборатория Красной книги Всероссийского научно-исследовательского института охраны природы, 2004 (2008). — С. 207. — 512 с. — ISBN 978-5-9243-0158-7 Полный текст
  2. 1 2 Определитель насекомых европейской части СССР. Т. III. Перепончатокрылые. Первая часть. // Подотряд Apocrita – Стебельчатобрюхие (Арнольди К. В. и др.) / под общ. ред. Г. С. Медведева. — Л.: «Наука», 1978. — С. 554. — 584 с. — (Определители по фауне СССР, издаваемые Зоологическим институтом АН СССР; вып. 119.). — 3500 экз.
  3. 1 2 Определитель насекомых Дальнего Востока России. Т. IV. Сетчатокрылообразные, скорпионницы, перепончатокрылые. Ч. 1 / под общ. ред. П. А. Лера. — СПб.: Наука, 1995. — С. 358. — 606 с. — 3150 экз.ISBN 5-02-025944-6.
  4. Красная книга Кемеровской области: Т. 2. Редкие и находящиеся под угрозой исчезновения виды животных. 2-е изд-е, перераб. и дополн. — Кемерово: «Азия принт», 2012. — 192 с. (С.49) — с илл. ISBN 5-85119-080-9
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Авторы и редакторы Википедии

Красноголовый муравей: Brief Summary ( Russo )

fornecido por wikipedia русскую Википедию

Красноголовый муравей (лат. Formica truncorum) — вид средних по размеру муравьёв рода Formica из подсемейства Formicinae (Formicidae).

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Авторы и редакторы Википедии