dcsimg

Associations ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

Seagrass beds may be disrupted by the activities of a variety of animals, including horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus), Cownose Rays (Rhinoptera bonasus), and Southern Stingrays (Dasyatis sabina). One mode of foraging that has been reported for manatees (Trichechus manatus) involves the use of their forelimbs to uproot seagrass, leaving scattered roots and blades behind. These disturbances have generally been viewed as having a negative impact on seagrass beds. Hall et al. note, however, that if the fragments created by these animals are capable of settling and rooting elsewhere, the result may be the formation of new seagrass patches. (Hall et al. 2006)

Taplin et al. (2005) investigated interactions between H. wrightii and the macroalga Caulerpa prolifera. Their experiments indicated that the density and biomass of H. wrightii were negatively influenced by the presence of C. prolifera. Whether the nature of the interaction was a result of competition for space, nutrients or light could not be determined from their study. The performance of both species, however, differed between the two water depths studied, suggesting that the outcome of the interaction may be moderated in some way by light levels.

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Comprehensive Description ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

Halodule wrightii is a "seagrass" that may form carpet-like beds in warm, shallow waters from the southeastern United States to South America (seagrasses superficially resemble grasses, but are not technically grasses since they are not in the family Poaceae) (Haynes 2000).

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Development ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

In a study of Halodule wrightii in the Gulf of Mexico off Alabama (U.S.A.), the total biomass of H. wrightii generally increased through late summer, then began to decline. The proportion of that mass accounted for by roots and rhizomes generally declined from a high level in mid-spring as the proportion comprising leaves generally increased. The mass of below-ground structures was always greater than that of above-ground structures. (McGovern and Blankenhorn 2007)

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Distribution ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

Halodule wrightii is the most common seagrass species in Brazil. This species approaches its southern distributional limit along the Rio de Janeiro state coast (Creed,1997). The northern limit of its range along the Atlantic coast of North America is North Carolina (Ferguson et al.1993).

The range of Halodule wrightii includes Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and North Carolina (U.S.A.); eastern Mexico; the West Indies; Central America (Belize, Guatemala, Nicaragua); and South America (Venezuela) (Haynes 2000).

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Ecology ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

In an assessment of light requirements of H. wrightii, Kenworthy and Fonseca (1996) found that the lower limit of depth distribution was controlled by light availability. Estimates of minimum light requirements ranged from about a quarter to a third of the light just beneath the water surface, much higher than light levels in the photic zone for many phytoplankton and macroalgae (typically just 1 to 5% of incident light).

Burd and Dunton (2001) used long-term data on the biomass of Halodule wrightii in the Upper Laguna Madre, Texas, to validate a model demonstrating the importance of underwater light intensity as a major abiotic factor regulating H. wrightii productivity.

Heck et al. (2006) assessed the individual and combined effects of removing large predators and enriching water column nutrients on Halodule wrightii meadows in Big Lagoon, Florida, U.S.A. To simulate the first-order effects of large predator reductions, the authors stocked enclosures with ~3 to 4 times natural densities of the omnivorous pinfish Lagodon rhomboides, the dominant
fish in local seagrass habitats, and supplemented nitrogen and phosphorus in the water column to nearly 3 times normal levels. Results showed both significant predator and nutrient effects, although there were fewer consumer effects and more negative nutrient effects on seagrasses than had been found in previous work, which had shown that mesograzers ameliorated the harmful effects of elevated nutrients on seagrasses. Epiphyte proliferation in nutrient enrichment treatments did not occur; thus, algal overgrowth could not explain the negative effects of nutrient loading on seagrass biomass. Instead, nutrient loading resulted in nitrogen-rich shoalgrass, and the authors suggest that this high-quality food stimulated pinfish herbivory, resulting in the decline of seagrass biomass in enrichment enclosures.

Armitage and Fourqurean (2006) transplanted H. wrightii sprigs into caged and uncaged plots in a Turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum) bed near a patch reef. Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) were added to half of the experimental plots. The authors recorded changes in seagrass shoot density, and after three months, measured above- and below-ground biomass and tissue
nutrient content of both Turtlegrass and H. wrightii. Herbivory immediately and strongly impacted H. wrightii. Within six days of transplantation, herbivory reduced the density of uncaged H. wrightii by over 80%, resulting in a decrease in above- and below ground biomass of nearly an order of magnitude. Turtlegrass shoot density and below-ground biomass were not affected by herbivory, but above-ground biomass and leaf surface area were higher within cages, suggesting that herbivory influenced both seagrass species, but that Turtlegrass was more resistant to herbivory pressure than was H. wrightii. Nutrient addition did not alter herbivory rates or the biomass of either species over the short-term duration of this study. In both species, nutrient addition had little effect on the tissue nutrient content of seagrass leaves, and the nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio was near the 30:1 threshold ratio that suggests a balance in supply, indicating that neither of these elements appeared to be limiting growth. The authors note that the different impacts of grazing on these two seagrass species suggest that herbivory may be an important regulator of the distribution of multiple seagrass species near herbivore refuges like patch reefs in the Caribbean.

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Habitat ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

Halodule wrightii is found in the intertidal zone of marine waters with sandy or muddy substrates at depth from 0 to 2 meters. Halodule wrightii occupies the shallowest waters in the Gulf of Mexico and is often exposed during low tides. (Haynes 2000)

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Reproduction ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

Like most seagrasses, Halodule wrightii is highly clonal, extending and maintaining perennial beds through the growth of underground rhizomes (McGovern and Blankenhorn 2007 and references therein).

Hall et al. (2006) found that vegetative fragments of Halodule wrightii can settle and re-root. Settlement of uprooted vegetative fragments may be a viable recruitment mechanism in some areas, especially where sexual reproduction (via flowering anfd fruiting) is not occurring or is rare. Fragments of the fast growing H. wrightii have the ability to remain viable for periods of time that allow for dispersal over large distances (kilometers). Morris & Virnstein (2004) observed a rapid recovery of H. wrightii in the northern Indian River Lagoon, Florida (U.S.A.), in quiescent, shallow water. This recovery occurred after complete demise of the existing seagrass bed. The initial recovery occurred as small patches, which may be indicative of recruitment by H. wrightii fragments. Hall et al. found that in their experiments H. wrightii was more successful at recruitment via fragments in spring than in fall. This species grows fastest throughout the spring and summer months and enters a period of dormancy during the late fall and winter months. Spring fragments of H. wrightii appear to have the potential to travel much greater distances in 4 weeks than do fall fragments, which lose viability by the second week. In addition to viability, of course, the distances the fragments can travel depend also on factors such as wind and tidal currents. (Hall et al. 2006)

In some parts of the range of H. wrightii, flowering and fruiting are rare, but in other areas these are apparently regular events (McGovern and Blankenhorn 2007 and references therein). In North Carolina, flowering has been reported from May to August and over a wide range of salinity (12 to 34 ppt). Flowers occurred at water depths from exposed to 1.5 meters deep at low tide. Halodule wrightii is dioecious (i.e., individual plants are either male or female rather than both). (Ferguson et al. 1993)

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Systematics and Taxonomy ( Inglês )

fornecido por EOL staff

For many years Halodule along the North American coast were considered to be distinct from H. wrightii and referred to as H. beaudettei. Based on studies of variation in leaf tip shape in the northern Gulf of Mexico, however, along, along with a failure to identify genetic (isozyme) differences between plants with the different morphologies supposedly representing distinct species, Haynes concluded that H. beaudettei should be treated as a synonym of H. wrightii (Haynes 2000 and references therein)

licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Shapiro, Leo
autor
Shapiro, Leo
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
EOL staff

Comprehensive Description ( Inglês )

fornecido por North American Flora
Halodule wrightii Aschers. Sitz.-ber. Ges. Nat. Freunde Berlin
1868 : 19.' 1868.— Bot. Zeit. 26: 511. ' 1868.
Diplanthera Wrightii Aschers. in H. & P. Nat. Pfl. Nacht. 37. 1897.
Rootstock creeping, rooting and sprouting at the nodes; leaves all submerged, linear, flat, less than 1 mm. wide, 3-40 cm. long, acute at the tip, ligulate at the base ; stipular sheaths scarious, scarcely 3 cm. long; staminate flower of 2 anthers at the end of a long pedicel; anthers 2-celled, about 6 mm. long; pistillate flower of 1 naked carpel about 3 mm. long; style short; stigma solitary, slender; mature fruit black.
Type locality : Cuba.
Distribution : Florida ; Cuba to Martinique.
licença
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
citação bibliográfica
Percy Wilson, Per Axel Rydberg, Norman Taylor, Nathaniel Lord Britton, John Kunkel Small, George Valentine Nash. 1909. PANDANALES-POALES; TYPHACEAE, SPARGANACEAE, ELODEACEAE, HYDROCHARITACEAE, ZANNICHELLIACEAE, ZOSTERACEAE, CYMODOCEACEAE, NAIADACEAE, LILAEACEAE, SCHEUCHZERIACEAE, ALISMACEAE, BUTOMACEAE, POACEAE (pars). North American flora. vol 17(1). New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
North American Flora

Halodule wrightii ( Inglês )

fornecido por wikipedia EN

Halodule wrightii is an aquatic plant in the Cymodoceaceae family.[3] It is referred to by the common names shoal grass or shoalweed, and is a plant species native to seacoasts of some of the warmer oceans of the world.

H. wrightii is an herb growing in salt-water marshes in intertidal regions, often submerged at high tide but emergent at low tide.[4]

Taxonomy

This plant was named after Charles Wright, who was an American botanist and collector. In 1853 and 1856 Wright participated in a surveying expedition and discovered Halodule wrightii.[5][6][7]

Some publications cite US specimens by the synonym, Halodule beaudettei,[8][9] but the two names represent the same species.[10][11][12][13]

Description

Seagrass is a marine angiosperm that possesses conductive tissue, shoot systems, rhizomes and flowers.[14] It has flat leaves up to 20 cm long, dark reddish-brown, with a few teeth on the margins. The fruits are spherical to egg-shaped, about 2 mm across.[10][4][15]

Distribution

This plant is mainly found in muddy coastal marsh waters and off the coast of many Caribbean islands.[14] It has been reported from Texas,[16] Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, North Carolina, Maryland,[10][17] Yucatán, Quintana Roo, Tabasco,[18][19][20] Costa Rica,[21] Belize,[22] Panamá, Cuba, Trinidad & Tobago, Venezuela, Brazil and Cape Verde.[23]

In California, it was intentionally introduced into the Salton Sea from Texas almost a century ago, but died out a long time ago.[24]

Ecology

These aquatic plants form sea beds and increase habitat stabilization through constant shoot and rhizome production. The string-like structure of the seagrass decrease water turbidity and movement of substrate whether it is sand or mud.[25] Seagrass beds function as an incubator for young juvenile fishes. They provide shelter from predators and reduce competition with other species. Halodule wrightii also supplies food resources to several species of fish, invertebrate marine life and manatees.[26] This species of plant has the ability to adapt to various levels of salinity and temperatures.

H. wrightii is able to reproduce sexually and asexually, however, flowering in this species is rare.

Conservation

Recreational activities, like jet skiing and boating, damage and uproot seagrass beds with ease in shallow coastal waters. Studies such as the one performed in Brazil's Abrolhos Marine National Park tested the direct effects of anchor damage caused by intense boating activity, and found that H. wrightii abundance was deeply impacted.[27]

Restoration

Restoration of seagrass beds has been experimentally tested many times.[28] One such experiment in Florida attempted to use H. wrightii as a pioneer species to stimulate natural succession to the eventual climax vegetation dominated by Thalassia testudinum. The experiment found that the application of fertilizer to transplants greatly increased their growth rate.[29]

References

  1. ^ Short, F.T.; Carruthers, T.J.R.; van Tussenbroek, B.; Zieman, J. (2010). "Halodule wrightii". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2010: e.T173372A7001725. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T173372A7001725.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
  2. ^ The Plant List Halodule wrightii
  3. ^ "Halodule wrightii Asch". Plants of the World Online. The Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. n.d. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  4. ^ a b Godfrey, R. K. & J. W. Wooten. 1979. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States Monocotyledons 1–712. The University of Georgia Press, Athens.
  5. ^ "Indian River Lagoon Species Inventory". Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort Pierce.
  6. ^ Berlin., Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu (1868-01-01). "Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin". Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin. 1868. ISSN 0433-8731.
  7. ^ Ascherson, Paul Friedrich August. 1897. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2: 37.
  8. ^ Hartog, Cornelis den. 1964. Blumea 12: 303.
  9. ^ Hartog, Cornelis den. 1960. Pacific Naturalist 1(15): 4–5, f. 2a–c.
  10. ^ a b c "Halodule wrightii in Flora of North America @ efloras.org". www.efloras.org. Retrieved 2017-02-03.
  11. ^ Phillips, Ronald C. (1 July 1967). "On Species of the Seagrass, Halodule, in Florida". Bulletin of Marine Science. 17 (3): 672–676.
  12. ^ McMmillan, C. 1991. Isozyme patterning in marine spermatophytes. In: L. Triest, ed. 1988+. Isozymes In Water Plants. Opera Botanica Belgica 1+ vols. Belgium, Meise. Vol. 4,: pp. 193--200.
  13. ^ "Image". www.tropicos.org. Retrieved 2017-02-03.
  14. ^ a b Gallegos, Me; Merino, M; Rodriguez, A; Marba, N; Duarte, Cm (1994). "Growth patterns and demography of pioneer Caribbean seagrasses Halodule wrightii and Syringodium filiforme". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 109: 99–104. Bibcode:1994MEPS..109...99G. doi:10.3354/meps109099.
  15. ^ Novelo, A. & L. Ramos. 2005. Vegetación acuática. Cap. 5: 111–144. In J. Bueno, F Álvarez & S. Santiago, Biodiversidad del Estado de Tabasco. CONABIO-UNAM, México.
  16. ^ Correll, D. S. & M. C. Johnston. 1970. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas i–xv, 1–1881. The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson
  17. ^ BONAP (Biota of North America Project) floristic synthesis, Halodule wrightii Image
  18. ^ Cowan, C. P. 1983. Flora de Tabasco. Listados Florísticos de México 1: 1–123.
  19. ^ Sousa Sánchez, M. & E. F. Cabrera Cano. 1983. Flora de Quintana Roo. Listados Florísticos de México 2: 1–100.
  20. ^ Novelo R., A. & A. L. H. 1994. 239. Cymodoceaeceae. 6: 15–16. In G. Davidse, M. Sousa Sánchez & A.O. Chater (eds.) Flora Mesoamericana. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D. F.
  21. ^ Hammel, B. E. 2003. Cymodoceaceae. In: Manual de Plantas de Costa Rica, B.E. Hammel, M.H. Grayum, C. Herrera & N. Zamora (eds.). Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 92: 456–457.
  22. ^ Balick, M. J., M. H. Nee & D.E. Atha. 2000. Checklist of the vascular plants of Belize. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 85: i–ix, 1–246.
  23. ^ Creed, Joel C.; Engelen, Aschwin H.; D´Oliveira, Emanuel C.; Bandeira, Salomão; Serrão, Ester A. (December 2016). "First record of seagrass in Cape Verde, eastern Atlantic". Marine Biodiversity Records. 9 (1): 57. doi:10.1186/s41200-016-0067-9. S2CID 7494405.
  24. ^ Hickman, J. C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California 1–1400. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  25. ^ Hall, Lauren M.; Hanisak, M. Dennis; Virnstein, Robert W. (3 April 2006). "Fragments of the seagrasses Halodule wrightii and Halophila johnsonii as potential recruits in Indian River Lagoon, Florida". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 310: 109–117. Bibcode:2006MEPS..310..109H. doi:10.3354/meps310109. JSTOR 24870011.
  26. ^ Pereira, Pedro H.C.; Ferreira, Beatrice P.; Rezende, Sérgio M. (September 2010). "Community structure of the ichthyofauna associated with seagrass beds (Halodule wrightii) in Formoso River estuary - Pernambuco, Brazil". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 82 (3): 617–628. doi:10.1590/S0001-37652010000300009. PMID 21562690.
  27. ^ Creed, Joel C; Amado Filho, Gilberto M (March 1999). "Disturbance and recovery of the macroflora of a seagrass (Halodule wrightii Ascherson) meadow in the Abrolhos Marine National Park, Brazil: an experimental evaluation of anchor damage". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 235 (2): 285–306. doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00188-9.
  28. ^ van Katwijk, Marieke M.; Thorhaug, Anitra; Marbà, Núria; Orth, Robert J.; Duarte, Carlos M.; Kendrick, Gary A.; Althuizen, Inge H. J.; Balestri, Elena; Bernard, Guillaume; Cambridge, Marion L.; Cunha, Alexandra; Durance, Cynthia; Giesen, Wim; Han, Qiuying; Hosokawa, Shinya; Kiswara, Wawan; Komatsu, Teruhisa; Lardicci, Claudio; Lee, Kun‐Seop; Meinesz, Alexandre; Nakaoka, Masahiro; O'Brien, Katherine R.; Paling, Erik I.; Pickerell, Chris; Ransijn, Aryan M. A.; Verduin, Jennifer J. (April 2016). "Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large‐scale planting". British Ecological Society Special Feature: Demography Beyond the Population. 53 (2): 567–578. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12562.
  29. ^ Kenworthy, W. Judson; Hall, Margaret O.; Hammerstrom, Kamille K.; Merello, Manuel; Schwartzschild, Arthur (March 2018). "Restoration of tropical seagrass beds using wild bird fertilization and sediment regrading". Ecological Engineering. 112: 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.008.
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia EN

Halodule wrightii: Brief Summary ( Inglês )

fornecido por wikipedia EN

Halodule wrightii is an aquatic plant in the Cymodoceaceae family. It is referred to by the common names shoal grass or shoalweed, and is a plant species native to seacoasts of some of the warmer oceans of the world.

H. wrightii is an herb growing in salt-water marshes in intertidal regions, often submerged at high tide but emergent at low tide.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia EN

Halodule wrightii ( Vietnamita )

fornecido por wikipedia VI

Halodule wrightii là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Cymodoceaceae. Loài này được Asch. mô tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1868.[1]

Chú thích

  1. ^ The Plant List (2010). Halodule wrightii. Truy cập ngày 16 tháng 7 năm 2013.

Liên kết ngoài


Bài viết về Bộ Trạch tả này vẫn còn sơ khai. Bạn có thể giúp Wikipedia bằng cách mở rộng nội dung để bài được hoàn chỉnh hơn.
licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia tác giả và biên tập viên
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia VI

Halodule wrightii: Brief Summary ( Vietnamita )

fornecido por wikipedia VI

Halodule wrightii là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Cymodoceaceae. Loài này được Asch. mô tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1868.

licença
cc-by-sa-3.0
direitos autorais
Wikipedia tác giả và biên tập viên
original
visite a fonte
site do parceiro
wikipedia VI