dcsimg

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

provided by AnAge articles
Maximum longevity: 19.2 years (wild)
license
cc-by-3.0
copyright
Joao Pedro de Magalhaes
editor
de Magalhaes, J. P.
partner site
AnAge articles

Behavior

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Perception Channels: visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Conservation Status

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Perisoreus canadensis is locally common over its wide range, but there is little precise population data. The Breeding Bird Surveys (BBS) from 1966 to 1993 show a -0.6% decline over that period, but with a statistically insignificant sample. The short-term BBS data trend from 1984 to 1993 show a 51.8% increase during that time (P

The Gray Jay is not listed as Endangered or Threatened in the United States or Canada. No special management measures have been implemented for the species.

(Madge 1994, Price 1995)

US Migratory Bird Act: protected

US Federal List: no special status

CITES: no special status

State of Michigan List: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

While many corvids can cause extensive crop damage, the Gray Jay, because of its habitat requirements, does not overlap with farms. It can, however, be an annoyance (some would say a great delight) to campers, as it will linger in campsites and attempt to pilfer food.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Perisoreus canadensis is valuable as an indicator of the health of boreal and sub-alpine systems. Although these areas are less altered than most biomes, acid precipitation and global climate change could have a noticeable effect on this species. Because they are specially adapted to harsh winter environments, Gray Jays may be negatively impacted by warming trends. Thus, the species could serve as an early-warning system for cascading effects of anthropogenic climate change.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Trophic Strategy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Gray Jays are omnivorous, commonly eating arthropods, berries, carrion, eggs, nestling birds, and fungi. Gray Jays use a variety of foraging techniques including flycatching, foliage gleaning, ground gleaning, and even aerial pursuit of rodents. Nestlings are fed partially digested food.

One of the most interesting traits of the Gray Jay is its food storage ability. This Jay has unusually large salivary glands that produce copious sticky saliva. They use this saliva to impregnate and encase food, creating a bolus that will adhere to trees. Away from ground scavengers and protected from the wind and snow, these caches allow efficient food hoarding. Gray Jays have been observed making over 1,000 caches in a single 17-hour day. This behavior may be the major adaptation enabling Perisoreus canadensis to occupy the hostile boreal regions during the winter. Fittingly, the genus Perisoreus means "hoarder."

(Dow 1965, Ehrlich 1988, Strickland 1993, Terres 1995)

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Distribution

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Breeding range: The Gray Jay is found from tree line in northern Canada and Alaska south through boreal and subalpine forests to northern California on the west coast, Arizona and New Mexico in the Rocky Mountains, northern Wisconsin in the midwest, and New York in the east.

Winter range: The non-breeding range is essentially the same as the breeding range, as the Gray Jay does not migrate except for (in late fall and winter) occasional altitudinal movements in the Rockies and rare latitudinal movements elsewhere, probably due to food shortages.

Perisoreus canadensis has never been recorded outside of North America.

(Sibley 2000, Strickland 1993, Ehrlich 1988)

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Habitat

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Gray Jays are associated with coniferous and coniferous-deciduous forests of the boreal and sub-alpine vegetative regions. They are most commonly found in spruce and fir woods (with occasional aspens or birch). Despite its association with humans, this jay does not live in towns or developments. It is exclusively a bird of remote forests. In fact, Gray Jays disappear as soon as a camp becomes a permanent settlement.

(Strickland 1993, Madge 1994, Goodwin 1986)

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Life Expectancy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Average lifespan
Status: wild:
185 months.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Morphology

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Often described as resembling an oversized chickadee, P. canadensis is a fluffy, pale-gray, long-tailed, short-billed, crestless jay. Gray Jays, while sexually monomorphic, do show strong regional variation, with three distinguishable populations: Pacific, Rocky Mountain, and Taiga. All adult variations have black eyes, bills, legs, and feet and white auriculars (ear patches) and throats. Pacific birds show extensive dark on the head and brownish-tinged backs. Rocky Mountain birds south of Canada have a whiter head. Taiga birds resemble Pacific birds, but are grayer above and have a grayer (rather than whitish) belly. Juveniles from all populations are sooty overall and gray-billed with white malar stripes.

Perisoreus canadensis is 11.5 inches (29 cm) long and has a wingspan of 18 inches (45 cm). Normal adult weight is 2.5 ounces (70 grams).

Gray Jays have a clear, pleasant whistle of wheeeooo or wheee-ah. Calls also include a low, husky chuf-chuf-weef and a very rough, dry kreh kreh kreh kreh alarm call. Like Blue Jays, P. canadensis sometimes sound a screeching jaaay. Gray Jays are known to mimic sounds.

(Sibley 2000, Peterson 1990)

Other Physical Features: endothermic ; bilateral symmetry

Average mass: 70.3 g.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Reproduction

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Perisoreus canadensis breeds in coniferous forests and sometimes in mixed coniferous-deciduous woodlands. The male chooses a nest site usually in a conifer (spruce or fir), at a height of 5 to 12 feet (1.5 - 3.6 m), sometimes as high as 30 feet (9.1 m). The male initiates building the nest - a thick cup of twigs, bark strips, grass, moss, lichen, and spider webs. The inside is lined with fine grasses, moss, hair, feathers, and fur. The female joins the building over a period of up to 3 weeks or more.

The breeding season begins in March, while snow is still on the ground and temperatures are well below freezing, and ends by mid-May. Curiously, second broods are not attempted in ostensibly favorable later months. Three to four eggs (29 X 21 mm) are laid (range 2-5) and incubated by the female alone. The eggs are pale greenish or gray-green and heavily speckled, spotted, or blotched with olive and paler gray. After a 16 to 18 day incubation period, the nestlings hatch slightly downy and altricial. The young are fed by both parents and fledge at 22 to 24 days.

Cowbird parasitism has not been observed.

(Baicich 1997, Veghte 1964)

Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; oviparous

Average time to hatching: 17 days.

Average eggs per season: 3.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Dietz, M. 2001. "Perisoreus canadensis" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Perisoreus_canadensis.html
author
Matthew Dietz, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Terry Root, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Common Names

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
gray jay

grey jay

Canada jay

whiskey Jack

camp robber
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Conservation Status

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
Information on state-level protected status of animals in the United States is available at NatureServe, although recent changes in status may not be included.
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Cover Requirements

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, forbs, forest, selection, succession, tree

Conifers, particularly spruce (Picea spp.), are the preferred cover for the gray jay. The territory size for a pair of gray jays in Algonquin Provincial Park and La Verendrye Provincial Park was 0.25 square mile [97].

Stand age: Although gray jays prefer mature coniferous forests [56,73,87,97,106,113,120], they can be found occupying all forest age classes [121,124].

Mature forest: During winter months, gray jays preferred late-seral (325 to >500 years old) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands in the southern Gifford Pinchot National Forest, Washington [56].

Gray jays surveyed in young (40-70 years old), mature (100-196 years), and old-growth (204-450 years) Douglas-fir/hardwood stands in northwestern California and southwestern Oregon reached peak abundance in the old-growth stands [87].

Gray jays were most abundant in mature stands and least abundant in young stands of a quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) mixed-wood forest in Alberta. The 3 age classes studied were: young (20-30 years old); mature (50-65 years old); and old stands (120+ years old) [99].

Of 5 seral stages studied in a forest dominated by Douglas-fir, western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), and red alder (Alnus rubra) in the Oregon Coast Ranges, gray jays were significantly (P<0.05) positively associated with late-seral forest structure and were most abundant in large saw timber plots (>20% cover, >21 inch (>53.2 cm) mean DBH) [73].

All age classes: Habitat generalists including the gray jay were common in all 3 age classes (40-59 years, 60-79 years, and 80+ years) of mature balsam fir forest in Newfoundland [121].

In ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) habitat in the Black Hills, South Dakota, gray jays utilized the sapling-pole, mature, and old-growth stages, but their habitat preference changed between the summer breeding season and winter [75,96]. During summer, optimal habitat included mature and old-growth ponderosa pine [75]. During winter, gray jays preferred mature and sapling-pole ponderosa pine stands [96].

As habitat generalists, gray jays may not be susceptible to changes in forest age distribution in jack pine (Pinus banksiana) forests near the White River in north-central Ontario. Jack pine stands were even-aged and ranged from 3 to 100 years old. Gray jays were most abundant on 18- to 20- year-old stands, but were not confined to that age class [124].

During the winter gray jay populations were greatest in the youngest stands (14 years old) compared to 30-year-old and 60-year-old stands in a mixed-age quaking aspen forest at Medicine Lake, Alberta [132].

Stand composition/structure: Most of the research on gray jays has compared various silvicultural strategies or analyzed succession after harvesting. Gray jays exhibit a range of responses to habitat fragmentation. They can be positively [51,62] or negatively affected [36,37] and, in most cases, show mixed or no response [10,25,44,46,84].

Positively affected by fragmentation: The mean number of bird species was measured in old-growth, fragmented old-growth and selectively harvested western redcedar (Thuja plicata)-western hemlock forests on the Priest Lake Ranger District of the Idaho Panhandle National Forest. Gray jay populations were greatest in the fragmented old-growth forest, characterized as an older-aged forest with 1- to 8-year-old clearcuts embedded [51]:

Mean number (s x ) of gray jays along 24 counting points in each area Old growth Fragmented old growth Selectively harvested P 0.06 (0.03) 0.14 (0.09) 0.03 (0.02) 0.04

The mean abundance of gray jay was greater on clearcut stands than unfragmented stands in a forest dominated by Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) in the Medicine Bow National Forest, Wyoming, but the differences were not statistically significant [62].

Negatively affected by fragmentation: Birds such as the gray jay, which forage in the foliage of trees, may decline following logging due to the reduction of total biomass foliage rather than decreased foliage height diversity or loss of tree volume. A decline in insect prey may also occur following logging [36,37].

Mixed responses to habitat fragmentation: During the winter in Oregon, gray jay abundance did not differ between commercially thinned and unthinned Douglas-fir stands in the Tillamook State Forest and the central Coast Ranges. Four thinned and four unthinned stands that were 40 to 55 years old and 161 to 1,260 acres (65-510 ha) in size were chosen in each of 2 locations. During the summer gray jays were more abundant (P<0.01) in unthinned versus thinned stands in the Tillamook State Forest; however, they were more abundant (P=0.10) in thinned versus unthinned stands in the central Oregon Coast Ranges. The abundance of gray jays varied positively with red alder cover and negatively with pole layer height.

Bird populations were compared in 6 lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) communities in the Uinta Mountains of Utah. The 6 communities were mature forest; stagnated forest composed of dense lodgepole pine stands; a 1940 clearcut that left no residual trees; a stagnated stand that was bulldozed and then broadcast burned; wet meadows along streams; and dry meadows with a dense mixture of grasses and forbs under widely scattered lodgepole pine. Gray jays were present in most of the communities and appeared to be uninfluenced by logging [10]:

Density of gray jays (individuals/100 acres (40 ha)) Mature forest Stagnated forest 1940 clearcut forest Bulldozed & burned forest Wet meadow Dry meadow 6 <1 <1 4 ---- 7

Breeding bird responses to 3 silvicultural alternatives were examined in a Douglas-fir forest on the McDonald-Dunn Forest, Oregon. The 3 treatments were: (1) small-patch group selection, in which ⅓rd of the wood volume was removed, representing low-severity disturbance; (2) 2-story treatment, in which ¾ths of the wood volume was removed, representing a moderate to high-severity disturbance; (3) modified clearcut treatment, in which 1.2 green trees/ha were retained, representing a high-severity disturbance; and (4) unharvested control for each treatment. One replicate was harvested each year for 3 years. The mean abundance of gray jays was highest in small-patch group selection cuts for each of the 3 years [25]:

Mean abundance of gray jays (no. of observations/5 ha (s x))   Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Control 0.3 (0.3) 1.3 (1.3) 1.0 (0.6) Small-patch 1.8 (0.5) 1.6 (0.6) 1.1 (0.4) 2-story 1.7 (1.2) 0.5 (0.3) 0.2 (0.2) Modified clearcut 1.5 (0.6) 0.0 (0.0) 0.2 (0.2)

Harrison and others [46] studied the effects of partial cutting on songbirds in mixed-wood forests near Peace River in northwestern Alberta. Dominant trees included quaking aspen, balsam poplar, and lodgepole pine. The mean abundance change for gray jay was not statistically significant.

Six seral stages within a sub-boreal spruce forest dominated by quaking aspen in valley bottoms and lowlands were surveyed to examine diversity of bird communities near Smithers, British Columbia. The seral stages were clearcut; shrub/herb; pole/sapling (<15 years); young quaking aspen (15- 49 years); mature quaking aspen (50+ years); and mature quaking aspen mixed with Engelmann spruce and lodgepole pine. Gray jays were present in the mixed quaking aspen stage and seen foraging in clearcuts, but were probably not nesting in the clearcut due to lack of suitable habitat [84].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Direct Effects of Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
As of 2006, no research directly investigated gray jay mortality due to fire. Fire can kill gray jays [80], but mortality is generally minor for adult birds [95]. If fires occur during the breeding season, mortality of nestlings or fledglings is possible, so adult birds may experience reduced reproduction rates [80].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Distribution

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals

The gray jay is a native resident from northern Alaska east to Newfoundland and Labrador and south to northern California, Idaho, Utah, east-central Arizona, north-central New Mexico, central Colorado, and southwestern South Dakota. It is also a native resident in northern Minnesota, northern Wisconsin, northern Michigan, northern New York, and northern New England. The gray jay may wander north of the breeding range. In winter it travels irregularly to northwestern Nebraska, central Minnesota, southeastern Wisconsin, central Michigan, southern Pennsylvania, central New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts [3,4,113].

Perisoreus canadensis albescens is a resident from northeastern British Columbia and northwestern Alberta southeastward, east of the Rocky Mountains to South Dakota (Black Hills). It< is casual in northwestern Nebraska [3].

Perisoreus c. arcus is a resident in the Rainbow Mountains area, and headwaters of the Dean and Bella Coola Rivers of the central Coast Ranges, British Columbia [3].

Perisoreus c. barbouri is a resident on Anticosti Island, Quebec [3].

Perisoreus c. bicolor is a resident in southeastern British Columbia, southwestern Alberta, eastern Washington, northeastern Oregon, northern and central Idaho, and western Montana [3].

Perisoreus c. canadensis breeds from northern British Columbia east to Prince Edward Island, and south to northern Minnesota, northern Wisconsin, northern Michigan, northeastern New York, northern Vermont, northern New Hampshire, and Maine. It winters at lower altitudes within the breeding range and south to southern Ontario and Massachusetts, casually to central Minnesota, southeastern Wisconsin, northwestern Pennsylvania, and central New York. Perisoreus c. canadensis is accidental in northeastern Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) [3].

Perisoreus c. capitalis is a resident in the southern Rocky Mountains from eastern Idaho, central south-central Montana, and western and southern Wyoming south through eastern Utah, and western and central Colorado, to central eastern Arizona and north-central New Mexico [3].

Perisoreus c. griseus is a resident from southwestern British Columbia and Vancouver Island south through central Washington and central Oregon to the mountains of north-central and northeastern California [3].

Perisoreus c. nigracapillus is a resident in northern Quebec (Fort Chimo, Whale River, and George River), throughout Labrador, and in southeastern Quebec (Mingan and Blanc Sablon) [3].

Perisoreus c. obscurus is a resident in the coastal belt from Washington (Crescent Lake, Seattle, and Columbia River) through western Oregon to northwestern California (Humboldt County) [3].

Perisoreus c. pacificus is a resident in north-central Alaska (Kobuk River, Endicott Mountains, and Fort Yukon), northern Yukon (Arctic Circle at the International Boundary), and northwestern Mackenzie (Mackenzie Delta and lower Horton River) south in Alaska to latitude 60° N [3].

Perisoreus c. sanfordi is a resident in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia [3].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Food Habits

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: density, forest, lichen, natural, presence, selection, tree

Gray jays are omnivorous [76,97,98,113]. Foods eaten include arthropods [113], small mammals [68], nestling birds [21,22,116,123] (see Predation), carrion [97,113], fungi [113], fruits such as chokecherry (Prunus virginiana) [97], and seeds [97]. Two gray jays were seen eating slime mold (Fuligo septica) near Kennedy Hot Springs in the Glacier Peak Wilderness, Washington. This was the 1st report of any bird consuming slime mold in the field [117].

Occasionally, gray jays eat live prey. Lescher and Lescher [68] witnessed a gray jay kill an unidentified, live small rodent in Wisconsin. Barnard [12] was the 1st to witness an in-flight gray jay capture of a magnolia warbler (Dendroica magnolia) for consumption.

Gray jays have been seen landing on moose (Alces alces) to remove and eat engorged winter deer ticks (Dermacentor albipictus) during April and May in Algonquin Provincial Park. Researchers also found a gray jay nest containing a brooding female, 3 hatchlings, and 3 warm, engorged winter deer ticks. Because the winter deer ticks were too large for the hatchlings to eat, it was hypothesized that the ticks may have served as "hot water bottles", keeping hatchlings warm when parents were away from the nest [1].

Gray jays are suspected but not proven to prey on nests of the threatened marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in coastal areas of the Pacific Northwest [88].

Foraging behavior: Gray jays do not hammer food with their bill as do other jays, but wrench, twist, and tug food apart. Gray jays commonly carry large food items to nearby trees to eat or process for storage, possibly as defense against large scavengers [113]. They are "scatterhoarders", caching food items among scattered sites for later consumption [69,71,128].

Any food intended for storage is manipulated in the mouth and formed into a bolus (rounded mass) that is coated with sticky saliva, adhering to anything it touches. The bolus is stored in bark crevices, under tufts of lichen, or among conifer needles [97].

Risk and energy expenditure are factors in food selection for gray jays. Gray jays select food on the basis of profitability to maximize caloric intake. Increased handling, searching, or recognition times for a preferred food item lowers its profitability [71].

The gray jay takes advantage of man-made sources of food, hence the names "camp robber" and "whiskey Jack". According to Maccarone and Montevecchi [71], human observers do not inhibit gray jay's feeding behavior; however, Rutter [97] claims that "once having identified man with food it does not forget". He found that after a nesting female was accustomed to being fed by humans she could be enticed to leave the nest during incubation and brooding [97].

Predation: Gray jays commonly prey on nestling birds [22,29,88,123]. Nests are located visually by moving from perch to perch and scanning surroundings [113]. Gray jay predation on nestling birds is temporally homogenous throughout the passerine breeding season [105]. Avian nest predation by gray jays is not necessarily higher in fragmented versus unfragmented forest [21,29,116,123].

Boulet and others [21] examined bird nest predation in a commercially fragmented boreal black spruce forest intermixed with jack pine, balsam fir, quaking aspen, and paper birch near Lake Saint-Jean, Quebec. Gray jays directed their attacks on artificial arboreal nests more often than artificial ground nests. Depredation of nests was positively related to the presence of the lake and jack pine. Gray jays may have preferred preying on avian nests in jack pine versus black spruce habitat because jack pine forests were more open, and trees did not conceal nests as well. Gray jays may have favored foraging along lakeshores and moist patches due to the high density of insects. No relationship was found between the fragmented forest and predation [21].

The potential for egg predation by gray jays was greater in riparian forest strips than in clearcuts in a second-growth boreal balsam fir forest in Montmorency Forest, Quebec [29].

Stuart-Smith and Hayes [116] examined the influence of residual tree density on predation of artificial and natural songbird nests. The study took place in the White River and Lussier River Watershed, southeastern British Columbia, in a forest dominated by Douglas-fir, white spruce, and western larch. Twenty-four plots of similar age were chosen (16 logged, 8 burned by wildfire); they varied in residual tree density between 0 and 180 trees/ha. Residual trees apparently did not increase predation on nesting songbirds by the gray jay. However, a moderate increase in nest predation occurred in logged plots adjacent to or surrounded by mature conifer forest, which is the preferred habitat for gray jays [56,87,97,106,113,120]. Retaining residual trees would outweigh the possible increased risk of nest predation, except in areas where nesting birds are at very low numbers and potential risk by gray jays is high [116].

When predation rates on bird nests by the gray jay were compared in clearcut, green-tree retention stands, and mature western hemlock stands in the west-central Oregon Cascade Ranges, predation rates were highest in green-tree retention stands. This may have been due to increased availability of perch sites for avian predators such as the gray jay [123].

Caching: Gray jays cache thousands of food items every day during the summer for use the following winter [112,126,127,129]. Caching behavior is thought to have evolved for several reasons. It allows for permanent residence in boreal and subalpine forests [113], ensures a food source in areas with high elevations and cyclic availability of food resources, and favors the retention of young and a kin-selected social organization [92]. In southern portions of the gray jay's range, food is not cached during summer because of the chance of spoilage and the reduced need for winter stores [113]. Cached items can be anything from carrion to bread crumbs and are formed into a bolus before being cached [97]. Cached food is sometimes used to feed nestlings and fledglings [97].

Caching is inhibited by the presence of Steller's jays [23] and gray jays from adjacent territories [126,127], which follow resident gray jays to steal cached food [23]. Gray jays carry large food items to distant cache sites for storage more often than small food items. To prevent theft, they also tend to carry valuable food items further from the source when caching in the company of 1 or more gray jays [127]. Scatterhoarding discourages pilferage by competitors. Cache thievery increases with increased cache density [126].

When exploiting distant food sources found in clearings, gray jays temporarily concentrated their caches in an arboreal site along the edge of a black spruce forest in interior Alaska. This allowed a high rate of caching in the short term and reduced the jay's risk of predation. A subsequent recaching stage occurred, and food items were transferred to widely scattered sites to reduce theft [128].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat-related Fire Effects

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, crown fire, density, fire regime, forest, frequency, habitat type, herb, indicator value, ladder fuels, natural, prescribed fire, severity, shrub, stand-replacing fire, succession, tree, underburn, wildfire

Modifications in the food supply and habitat of gray jays may occur following fire, as well as changes in the abundance of competitors and predators [95]. According to Finch and others [33], the effects of fire on birds and their habitat vary with: 1) the severity and extent of the fire; 2) temporal scales; 3) life history characteristics of the bird species; and 4) whether or not salvage logging occurs following fire. Severe fires alter the forest structure more than low-severity fires, and a stand-replacing fire may result in the successional replacement of a bird species with a different bird species. Large, severe fires may greatly alter bird habitat in the short term but may be necessary for long-term maintenance of some forest types [58]. Fire may be beneficial to cavity-nesting, timber-drilling, grain-collecting, and fly-catching birds due to increased nesting habitat and food supplies [18,19,24,45,50,58,111,119]. Salvage logging may reduce the benefits of fire to birds that utilize snags for cavity nesting and foraging [58].

A meta-analysis of studies of bird responses to fire showed that gray jays and other bird species that share the same nest type, nest layer, and foraging guild do not show a distinct positive or negative response to fire. The analysis is shown below; the table does not distinguish between fire types (wildland, prescribed, stand-replacing, understory, various severities), vegetation types, or time since fire [98]:

Response to fire (% of studies)   n positive negative none mixed Nest type: Open-cup nest 544 29 23 39 9 Nest layer: Canopy nest 423 31 18 42 9 Foraging guild: Omnivore 296 32 21 37 9

Gray jays are usually present in postfire habitats after fires of varying severities but experience lower abundance in burned than unburned areas. Results of studies examining gray jay responses to wildfire, prescribed burning, logging versus burning, and salvage logging follow.

Wildfire: Changes in bird abundance and species composition following mixed-severity wildfires were studied in low-elevation ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir habitat and mid-elevation mixed-conifer and lodgepole pine habitats in the Bitterroot National Forest in west-central Montana. In July and August 2000, dry lightning storms ignited fires of 99 to 135,900 acres (40-55,000 ha) in size; the fires ranged from low-severity to severe. Transects had been established in 1994 and 1995 before the wildfires occurred, and 1 year following the fires, burned and unburned transects of differing fire severities were compared. The mean relative abundance (number of gray jays detected within 100 m/point × 100 ± standard error) for gray jays was lowest following fire [109,110]:

Mean relative abundance ± s x

 

Before fire

After fire

Unburned points (n=120) 9.8 ± 2.2 8.1 ± 2.1 Burned points (n=122) 12.4 ± 2.7 4.2 ± 1.5

Gray jays were ubiquitous in various successional portions of lodgepole pine and Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir forests following wildfires in Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Parks, Wyoming; however, they were most abundant in severely burned areas 43 and 44 years following fire, which is typically when the canopy closes following severe wildfire. Ten areas were sampled in both Parks ranging from 1 to 304 years after fire and 40 to several hundred acres in size. In Grand Teton National Park, unburned, moderately burned, and severely burned areas were examined. In moderately burned areas, 40% or more of the tree understory was alive 1 year following the fire, and part of the grass-forb-shrub understory was unburned. In severely burned areas, all aboveground vegetation was killed by a severe crown fire. In Yellowstone National Park, all sampling areas were severely burned in 1667 and 1956 [119].

Gray jay densities were highest in unburned versus burned lodgepole pine and Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir forests in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. In 1974, the Trail Creek Wildfire burned 581 acres (235 ha) of 250-year-old lodgepole pine forest with an understory of Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir. In 1976, the Divide Wildfire burned 1,601 acres (648 ha) of 350+ year-old Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir forest. Fire severities were not documented. Avian communities were surveyed in 1978 and 1979 [83].

Gray jays preferred the ecotone and unburned areas of subalpine lodgepole pine forest 8 years following a high-severity wildfire on the Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado. The fire burned approximately 470 acres (190 ha), killing or top-killing virtually all aboveground vegetation. The total number of gray jays recorded on 6-point counts on three 49 acre (20 ha) plots is shown below [94]:

Total number of gray jays (and no. of territories)/ plot

Burned Ecotone Unburned 0 10 (2) 5 (1)

A literature review reported that gray jays were more abundant on unburned sites than on 23 severely burned conifer forests in the western United States [63].

Canopy cover did not predict distribution of canopy foragers such as the gray jay between burned and unburned lodgepole pine forests in Grand Teton National Park. Two-year postfire and six-year postfire sites were compared with unburned sites. Details about the size and severity of the fires were not given. Gray jays utilized the 2-year burns, 6-year burns, and unburned sites most during the postbreeding season. The mean frequency of observations during the breeding and postbreeding season of the gray jay is shown below [108]:

Mean frequency of observations × 100 (frequency of observations)

Treatment

Postfire year 2

Postfire year 6 unburned Breeding season 4 (3) 5 (3) 2 (1) Postbreeding season 36 (17) 13 (5) 28 (8)

Prescribed burning: Bock and Bock [20] studied the effects of prescribed fire on birds in ponderosa pine forests in the southern Black Hills, South Dakota. One area was burned in October 1979, covering 156 acres (63 ha). Another study area was burned in April and May 1980, burning 806 acres (326 ha). Both burns were low-severity in local isolated spots. Point counts were conducted in June 1980 and June 1981 on burned and unburned plots. Gray jay abundance was greatest on unburned plots for both years [20]:

Mean no. of breeding birds Year Burned Unburned 1980 0 0.7 1981 0.1 0.7

Logging versus wildfire: Clearcutting and stand-replacing fire both lead to early-successional forest; however, they do not provide the same habitat conditions [53]. Clearcuts and wildfires are distinct from each other for several reasons: 1) logging causes greater site disturbance due to road construction and logging equipment; 2) logging removes stems from a site; 3) wildfire leaves live residual stands, burned trees, and downed woody debris; 4) wildfire size, frequency, and distribution are different from cutblocks; and 5) wildfire is not predictable and does not target the most valuable trees [58]. Nevertheless, research comparing gray jays on logged and burned sites does not show any clear pattern of preferences.

Bird communities were compared between burned and harvested sites in a quaking aspen-dominated boreal mixed-wood forest in north-central Alberta. Three replicate stands were chosen from each class (1,14, and 28 postdisturbance years) and treatment (wildfire vs. harvest). More than 95% of the canopy trees were dead on burned sites. An average of 6% of preharvest trees remained on the harvested sites. Gray jay density was greater within 14-year-old postfire stands than in postharvest stands. Gray jays may have been responding to differences in the herb and shrub strata between postfire and postharvest stands [53]:

Density of gray jays (mean number of individuals (± s x)/25acres) Postdisturbance year 1 14 28 Postfire 0.7 ± 0.7 4.3 ± 2.0 1.3 ± 0.3 Postharvest 1.7 ± 0.9 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0

Avian response to forest management practices was examined in mature ponderosa pine forests mixed with Douglas-fir or grand fir (Abies grandis) in Montana. Three site categories were chosen: 1) control sites containing either ladder fuels or encroachment by small- or medium- diameter trees; 2) treated sites that had been logged, underburned, or a combination of the 2 to reduce fuels and create open structural conditions; and 3) sites with a natural underburn in 2000. Gray jays were present in all 3 sites but most abundant in the control [133].

In northwestern Lac Saint Jean, Quebec, gray jays showed no significant (P>0.05) difference in abundance in postfire and postlogging stages in stands formerly dominated by black spruce [59].

Avian abundance was compared in wildfire and clearcut areas in a former black spruce forest near Goose Bay, Newfoundland after 5,14, and 27 years of succession. Details about the size and severity of the burn were not documented. Gray jay was not a common species in the study area but may have slightly preferred clearcut plots over burned plots [107].

Schulte and Niemi [100] surveyed bird communities in early-successional forests following logging and fire near Tower, Minnesota. Logged sites had been clearcut and contained residual trees and residual patches of trees. Wildfire sites were dominated by quaking aspen, and 5,189 acres (2,100 ha) of forest had burned. Logged sites were chosen to match the time of disturbance, predisturbance type, and soils of the burned sites. According to the vegetation analysis, habitat heterogeneity was greater in burned areas. The gray jay was 1 of 5 bird species highly associated with snags in this study; snags were probably utilized for foraging. Gray jay abundance did not differ significantly between logged and burned sites [100]:

Gray jay abundance (territorial males/ha)

Mean

s x P value Logged 0.02 0.02 0.12 Burned 0.10 0.06

Salvage logging: Resident species such as the gray jay were less likely to be detected in salvaged areas of a burned mixed-wood forest (dominant trees were white spruce and quaking aspen), a jack pine forest, and a quaking aspen forest near Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan than in logged areas. In 1995, a wildfire burned 98,840 acres (40,000 ha), killing a majority of the trees in the burned areas. Salvage logging took place in 1997. In 1998, surveys were conducted in unburned, burned, and salvaged forests. The indicator value of gray jay for each treatment in the 3 habitat types is shown below [76]:

Habitat type Indicator value (% ) Unburned Burned Salvaged P Mixed-wood 36 41 24 0.999 Jack pine 34 22 1 0.106 Quaking aspen 0 17 not salvaged 0.468

The following table provides fire return intervals for plant communities and ecosystems where the gray jay is important. Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find FIRE REGIMES".

Community or Ecosystem Dominant Species Fire Return Interval Range (years) silver fir-Douglas-fir Abies amabilis-Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii >200 grand fir Abies grandis 35-200 [6] tamarack Larix laricina 35-200 [81] western larch Larix occidentalis 25-350 [7,14,30] Great Lakes spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35 to >200 northeastern spruce-fir Picea-Abies spp. 35-200 [31] Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir Picea engelmannii-Abies lasiocarpa 35 to >200 [6] black spruce Picea mariana 35-200 conifer bog* Picea mariana-Larix laricina 35-200 [31] pinyon-juniper Pinus-Juniperus spp. <35 [81] whitebark pine* Pinus albicaulis 50-200 [2,5] jack pine Pinus banksiana <35 to 200 [28,31] Rocky Mountain lodgepole pine* Pinus contorta var. latifolia 25-340 [13,14,118] Colorado pinyon Pinus edulis 10-400+ [35,40,61,81] Sierra lodgepole pine* Pinus contorta var. murrayana 35-200 Pacific ponderosa pine* Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa 1-47 [6] interior ponderosa pine* Pinus ponderosa var. scopulorum 2-30 [6,11,66] red pine (Great Lakes region) Pinus resinosa 3-18 (x=3-10) [27,38] red-white pine* (Great Lakes region) Pinus resinosa-P. strobus 3-200 [28,48,70] eastern white pine Pinus strobus 35-200 eastern white pine-eastern hemlock Pinus strobus-Tsuga canadensis 35-200 [125] aspen-birch Populus tremuloides-Betula papyrifera 35-200 [31,125] quaking aspen (west of the Great Plains) Populus tremuloides 7-120 [6,41,74] Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir* Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca 25-100 [6,8,9] coastal Douglas-fir* Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii 40-240 [6,77,90] redwood Sequoia sempervirens 5-200 [6,34,115] western redcedar-western hemlock Thuja plicata-Tsuga heterophylla >200 western hemlock-Sitka spruce Tsuga heterophylla-Picea sitchensis >200 [6] *fire return interval varies widely; trends in variation are noted in the species review
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Cover Types

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):

More info for the term: cover

SAF COVER TYPES [32]:




1 Jack pine

5 Balsam fir

12 Black spruce

13 Black spruce-tamarack

15 Red pine

16 Aspen

18 Paper birch

21 Eastern white pine

22 White pine-hemlock

24 Hemlock-yellow birch

33 Red spruce-balsam fir

38 Tamarack

107 White spruce

201 White spruce

202 White spruce-paper birch

203 Balsam poplar

204 Black spruce

205 Mountain hemlock

206 Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir

208 Whitebark pine

210 Interior Douglas-fir

212 Western larch

217 Aspen

218 Lodgepole pine

219 Limber pine

224 Western hemlock

225 Western hemlock-Sitka spruce

227 Western redcedar-western hemlock

228 Western redcedar

229 Pacific Douglas-fir

230 Douglas-fir-western hemlock

232 Redwood

237 Interior ponderosa pine

239 Pinyon-juniper

243 Sierra Nevada mixed conifer

244 Pacific ponderosa pine-Douglas-fir

245 Pacific ponderosa pine

251 White spruce-aspen

252 Paper birch

253 Black spruce-white spruce

254 Black spruce-paper birch

256 California mixed subalpine
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Ecosystem

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):

ECOSYSTEMS [39]:




FRES10 White-red-jack pine

FRES11 Spruce-fir

FRES19 Aspen-birch

FRES20 Douglas-fir

FRES21 Ponderosa pine

FRES22 Western white pine

FRES23 Fir-spruce

FRES24 Hemlock-Sitka spruce

FRES25 Larch

FRES26 Lodgepole pine

FRES27 Redwood

FRES35 Pinyon-juniper
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Plant Associations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):

More info for the terms: bog, forest, woodland

KUCHLER [65] PLANT ASSOCIATIONS:




K001 Spruce-cedar-hemlock forest

K002 Cedar-hemlock-Douglas-fir forest

K003 Silver fir-Douglas-fir forest

K004 Fir-hemlock forest

K005 Mixed conifer forest

K006 Redwood forest

K008 Lodgepole pine-subalpine forest

K011 Western ponderosa forest

K012 Douglas-fir forest

K013 Cedar-hemlock-pine forest

K014 Grand fir-Douglas-fir forest

K015 Western spruce-fir forest

K016 Eastern ponderosa forest

K017 Black Hills pine forest

K018 Pine-Douglas-fir forest

K020 Spruce-fir-Douglas-fir forest

K021 Southwestern spruce-fir forest

K023 Juniper-pinyon woodland

K093 Great Lakes spruce-fir forest

K094 Conifer bog

K095 Great Lakes pine forest

K096 Northeastern spruce-fir forest

K106 Northern hardwoods

K107 Northern hardwoods-fir forest

K108 Northern hardwoods-spruce forest
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Management Considerations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: association, cover, forest, hardwood

Gray jay populations are decreasing slightly. Breeding Bird Surveys conducted from 1966 to 1992 revealed that gray jay populations declined at a rate of 1.28%/year [82]. Gray jay abundance decreased in ponderosa pine forests in New Mexico from 1911 to 1961 [101].

The Nicolet National Forest Bird Survey in northeastern Wisconsin showed gray jay populations decreased from 1989 to 2002; however, the Breeding Bird Survey conducted in the same forest found gray jay populations increased during this time. This may be because Breeding Bird Survey routes were established randomly along roadsides [91], whereas the Nicolet National Forest Bird Survey routes were established within gray jay habitat [54].

Members of a guild are more likely to respond similarly when they are grouped according to their association with habitat zones instead of by the "guild approach", which groups bird species into guilds based on their foraging and nesting behavior. According to Skinner [108], the "guild approach" may be problematic for 2 reasons: a lack of consistency in how investigators assign bird species to guilds and a false assumption that the response of 1 species in a guild is representative of all species in that guild [108].

Silviculture: Because gray jays prefer mature forests [56,75,87,97,102,106,113,120], management activities such as harvesting mature and old-growth ponderosa pine stands [75], clearcutting, conversion of hardwood or mixed stands to pure conifer stands, and a maximum rotation period of 100 years may reduce the quantity or quality of preferred habitat for the gray jay [106]. Nevertheless, maintaining as much landscape diversity as possible is beneficial to the gray jay [102]. For more information on silvicultural treatments and the gray jay, (see Stand composition/structure).

The amount and orientation of residual live and dead trees is an important component of stand structure following disturbance [53]. Wakkinen and Reese [130] and Hobson and Schieck [53] suggest managing for both dead and partially dead snags of different sizes in a variety of stand types to provide nesting, feeding, and perching sites for birds.

Dwarf mistletoe: Gray jays are one of the most common vectors in the long-distance dispersal of dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium spp.) seeds [16,47,79]. Seeds are inadvertently picked up on gray jay feathers when birds forage or nest in infected trees [55,79,86]. Bennetts and others [16] suggest control of dwarf mistletoe "may not be justified, practical, or even desirable" in areas where management goals are not focused on timber production. Pineland dwarf mistletoe (A. vaginatum) in central Colorado may have positive effects on avian habitat, creating a mosaic of habitat patches for nesting and cover [16].

Some timber management practices may reduce the quantity or quality of preferred habitat for the gray jay. A 150- year-old, even-aged western hemlock forest on the Siuslaw National Forest, Oregon, was inventoried for wildlife management needs. The gray jay, which may require western hemlock forests older than 100 years, may be adversely affected by timber management activities that include clearcutting, conversion of hardwood or mixed stands to pure conifer stands, and rotation periods of less than 100 years [106].

Other: The impact of repeated human intrusions on gray jays was studied in a subalpine forest in the Snowy Mountains of Wyoming. The average number of gray jays was higher on intruded sites than on control sites, as was the probability of intrusion reoccurring. The potential for gray jay predation may be higher in human-intruded areas, but more studies are needed [42].

The gray jay has a high potential for damage from exposure to aerial insecticide treatments due to open-cup nests [89].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Predators

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals

Gray jays warn each other of predators by whistling alarm notes, screaming, chattering, or imitating, and/or mobbing predators [113].

Gray jays are consumed by several bird species including great gray owls (Strix nebulosa) [78], northern hawk-owls (Surnia ulula) [93], and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida) [122,131].

Gray jay remains were found in the nest sites of fisher (Martes pennanti) [85] and American marten (Martes americana) [52]. Red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) eat gray jay eggs [97].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Preferred Habitat

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: density, hardwood, shrub

Gray jays are habitat generalists [62,73,75,96,99,102,120,121,124,132] but prefer mature coniferous habitats [56,87,97,106,113,120] and mixed conifer-deciduous forests with spruce (Picea spp.) typically present [113].

Pure hardwood stands are used for foraging but are not part of the defended territory [97].

Theberge [120] examined the density of gray jays in various vegetation communities in Kluane National Park, Yukon. Gray jays were most abundant in the mature white spruce community but were present in 7 distinctly different vegetation communities, indicating a lack of habitat specialization [120]:

Vegetation community Upland willow (Salix spp.) shrub Lowland willow shrub White spruce-balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera ssp. balsamifera) Mature white spruce Riparian balsam poplar Balsam poplar parkland Subalpine Density of males per 40 ha 10.0 6.7 6.0 16.8 10.0 12.5 1.7
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):

BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS [17]:




1 Northern Pacific Border

2 Cascade Mountains

4 Sierra Mountains

5 Columbia Plateau

6 Upper Basin and Range

7 Lower Basin and Range

8 Northern Rocky Mountains

9 Middle Rocky Mountains

10 Wyoming Basin

11 Southern Rocky Mountains

12 Colorado Plateau

15 Black Hills Uplift
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

States or Provinces

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
(key to state/province abbreviations)
UNITED STATES AL AK AZ CA CO ID ME MI MN MT NE NH NM NY ND OR SD UT VT WA WI WY
CANADA AB BC MB NB NF NT NS NU ON PE PQ SK YK
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Taxonomy

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
Perisoreus canadensis (Linnaeus) is the scientific name for the gray jay,
a member of the Corvidae family. Listed below are 11 recognized subspecies [4,60,104]:



Perisoreus canadensis albescens Peters

Perisoreus canadensis arcus Miller

Perisoreus canadensis barbouri Brooks

Perisoreus canadensis bicolor Miller

Perisoreus canadensis canadensis Linnaeus

Perisoreus canadensis capitalis Ridgway

Perisoreus canadensis griseus Ridgway

Perisoreus canadensis nigricapillus Ridgway

Perisoreus canadensis obscurus Ridgway

Perisoreus canadensis pacificus Gmelin

Perisoreus canadensis sanfordi Oberholser
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Timing of Major Life History Events

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: altricial, cooperative breeding, forest, frequency, lichens, phase, tree

Mating: Gray jays typically breed at 2 years of age. Pairs are monogamous and remain together for their lifetime, but a male or female will find another mate following the disappearance or death of their partner [113]. Gray jay pairs breed during March and April, depending on latitude [97,112,113], in permanent, all-purpose territories [53,76,97,112,113]. Second broods are not attempted, perhaps allowing greater time for food storage (see Caching) [97,113].

Gray jays cooperatively breed [112,114,129]. Strickland [112] studied cooperative breeding of gray jays in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, and La Verendrye Provincial Park, Quebec. In early June, when broods were 55 to 65 days old, the young fought amongst themselves until dominant juveniles forced their siblings to leave the natal area. Dominant juveniles, known as "stayers", remained with their parents, and "leavers" left the natal territory to join an unrelated pair who failed to breed. Two-thirds of "stayers" were male [112].

During the nest-building phase of the subsequent breeding season, approximately 65% of gray jay trios included "stayers" from the previous spring and their parents, and approximately 30% of trios included an unrelated "leaver". Occasionally, 2 nonbreeders accompany a pair of adults. "Stayers" may eventually inherit the natal territory and breed, and "leavers" may eventually fill a vacancy nearby or form a new breeding pair on previously unoccupied ground [112]. The role of "stayers" is to retrieve caches and bring food to younger siblings [114,129]; however, this is only allowed by the parents during the postfledgling period [112,114,129]. Until then, parents are hostile toward the "stayer". This may reduce the frequency of predator-attracting visits to the nest when young are most vulnerable. The benefits of allofeeding may include "lightening the load" for the breeding pair, which may possibly increase longevity, reducing the probability of starvation of nestlings, and detecting and mobbing predators near the nest [114].

Nesting: Nesting typically occurs in March and April [97,113]. Male gray jays choose a nest site in a mature coniferous tree [53,76] and take the lead in construction [113]. Gray jay nests were found in black spruce (Picea mariana), white spruce (Picea glauca), and balsam fir (Abies balsamea) trees in Ontario and Quebec, with black spruce predominating [97,113]. Cup-shaped nests [53,64,76,98] were constructed with brittle dead twigs pulled off of trees, as well as bark strips and lichens. Cocoons of the forest tent caterpillar (Malacosoma dysstria) filled the interstitial spaces of the nest [113]. Nests are usually built on the southwestern side of a tree for solar warming and are usually <1 nest diameter from the trunk [97]. Nest height is typically 8 to 30 feet (2.4-9.1 m) above the ground [72,97]. The average height of 264 nests surveyed in Algonquin Provincial Park was 16 feet ± 9.2 (4.9 m ± 2.8) above ground [97].

Clutch size is 2 to 5 eggs. The mean clutch sizes of gray jays in Algonquin Provincial Park and La Verendrye Provincial Park were 3.03 and 3.18 eggs, respectively. Incubation is performed only by the female [97,113] and lasts an average of 18.5 days [113].

Fledging: Gray jay young are altricial.

Nestling growth is most rapid from the 4th through the 10th day following hatching. Young are fed food carried in the throats of both parents [97,113]. They are fed by the accompanying nonbreeding 3rd bird ("stayer") only during the postfledgling period (see Mating) [114,129]. Food is a dark brown, viscous paste containing primarily arthropods [97,113]. Young gray jays leave the nest between 22 and 24 days after hatching [113]. Juveniles reach full adult measurements within 5 months [43].

Natal dispersal distance for the gray jay is a median of 0.0 mile (0.0 km) for males, 1.7 miles (2.8 km) for females, and a maximum distance of 7.0 miles (11.3 km) for males and females [112].

Survival: In studies conducted in Ontario and Quebec, the mortality rate for nonbreeding dominant juveniles ("stayers") was 52%, and mortality was 85% for nonbreeding "leavers" between fledging in June to approximately mid-October. From fall to the following breeding season in March, further nonbreeder mortality was 50%. Territory-holding adult gray jays experienced low mortality rates (15.1% and 18.2% for males and females, respectively) [112]. The oldest known female gray jay was 16 years old, and one male was at least 14 years old [113]. Food-storing birds such as the gray jay may live longer than other species due to the increased probability of food availability [92].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Use of Fire in Population Management

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the term: wildfire

The data currently available suggest that gray jays are present in burned forests but are usually more abundant in unburned habitats [20,63,83,94,109,110,133]. This may be due to their preference for mature trees for foraging and nesting [53,56,76,87,97,106,113,120]. Because gray jays are habitat generalists [62,73,75,96,99,102,120,121,124,132] and omnivores [76,97,98,113], they may exhibit greater flexibility in response to habitat disturbances such as fire and logging than other bird species. Most studies examining gray jay response to fire have been conducted several years following wildfire. More research needs to be conducted on the immediate effects of low- and high-severity wildfire on gray jay, as well as the best time of year to conduct prescribed burning for gray jay management.

The amount and orientation of residual live and dead trees is an important component of stand structure following disturbance [53]. Gray jays utilize snags for perch sites [53,113,116,123,130], so they may be negatively affected by salvage logging. Wakkinen and Reese [130] and Hobson and Schieck [53] suggest managing for both dead and partially dead snags of different sizes in a variety of stand types to provide nesting, feeding, and perching sites for birds such as the gray jay.

Smucker and others [110] suggest that managers prescribe and allow for a range of fire severities to meet the needs of all bird species.

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena D. 2006. Perisoreus canadensis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ (2007, January 16). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Canada jay

provided by wikipedia EN

The Canada jay (Perisoreus canadensis), also known as the gray jay, grey jay, camp robber, or whisky jack, is a passerine bird of the family Corvidae. It is found in boreal forests of North America north to the tree line, and in the Rocky Mountains subalpine zone south to New Mexico and Arizona. A fairly large songbird, the Canada jay has pale grey underparts, darker grey upperparts, and a grey-white head with a darker grey nape. It is one of three members of the genus Perisoreus, a genus more closely related to the magpie genus Cyanopica than to other birds known as jays. The Canada jay itself has nine recognized subspecies.

Canada jays live year-round on permanent territories in coniferous forests, surviving in winter months on food cached throughout their territory in warmer periods. The birds form monogamous mating pairs, with pairs accompanied on their territories by a third juvenile from the previous season. Canada jays adapt to human activity in their territories and are known to approach humans for food, inspiring a list of colloquial names including "lumberjack", "camp robber", and "venison-hawk". The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) considers the Canada jay a least-concern species, but populations in southern ranges may be affected adversely by global warming.

The species is associated with mythological figures of several First Nations cultures, including Wisakedjak, a benevolent figure whose name was anglicized to Whiskyjack. In 2016, an online poll and expert panel conducted by Canadian Geographic magazine selected the Canada jay as the national bird of Canada, although the designation is not formally recognized.

Taxonomy

Subspecies P. c. capitalis, Grand Tetons, Wyoming

In 1760 the French zoologist Mathurin Jacques Brisson included a description of the Canada jay in his Ornithologie based on a specimen collected in Canada. He used the French name Le geay brun de Canada and the Latin Garralus canadensis fuscus.[2] Although Brisson coined Latin names, these do not conform to the binomial system and are not recognised by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.[3] When in 1766 the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus updated his Systema Naturae for the twelfth edition, he added 240 species that had been previously described by Brisson.[3] One of these was the Canada jay. Linnaeus included a brief description, coined the binomial name Corvus canadensis and cited Brisson's work.[4]

William John Swainson named it Dysornithia brachyrhyncha in 1831.[5] French ornithologist Charles Lucien Bonaparte assigned the Canada jay to the genus Perisoreus in 1838 in A geographical and comparative list of the birds of Europe and North America, along with the Siberian jay, P. infaustus.[6] The Canada jay belongs to the crow and jay family Corvidae. However, it and the other members of its genus are not closely related to other birds known as jays; they are instead close to the genus Cyanopica, which contains the azure-winged magpie.[7] Its relatives are native to Eurasia, and ancestors of the Canada jay are thought to have diverged from their Old World relatives and crossed Beringia into North America.[8]

Subspecies P. c. capitalis (left) and P. c. obscurus (right); illustration by Keulemans, 1877

A 2012 genetic study revealed four clades across its range: a widespread "boreal" or "taiga" clade ranging from Alaska to Newfoundland and ranging south to the Black Hills of South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah in the west and New England in the east, a "transcascade" clade in eastern Washington and Oregon and ranging into Alberta and Montana, a "Rocky Mountains (Colorado)" clade from the southern Rocky Mountains, and a "Pacific" clade from coastal British Columbia, Washington, and southwestern Oregon. There was also a population of the boreal clade in the central Rocky Mountains between the Colorado and transcascade clades. Genetic dating suggests the Pacific clade diverged from the common ancestor of the other clades around three million years ago in the Late Pliocene.[8]

The boreal clade is genetically diverse, suggesting that Canada jays retreated to multiple areas of milder climate during previous ice ages and recolonized the region in warmer times.[8]

In 2018 the common name was changed from grey jay to Canada jay by the American Ornithological Society in a supplement to their Check-list of North American Birds.[9] This change was also made in the online list of world birds maintained on behalf of the International Ornithologists' Union by Frank Gill and David Donsker.[10]

Nine subspecies are recognized:[11][10]

  • Perisoreus canadensis albescens, also known as the Alberta jay, was described by American ornithologist James L. Peters in 1920. It ranges from northeastern British Columbia and northwestern Alberta southeastward, east of the Rocky Mountains to the Black Hills of South Dakota. It is an occasional visitor to northwestern Nebraska.[12]
  • P. c. bicolor, described by American zoologist Alden H. Miller in 1933, is found in southeastern British Columbia, southwestern Alberta, eastern Washington, northeastern Oregon, northern and central Idaho, and western Montana.[12] Miller noted that the subspecies appeared to be a stable intermediate form between canadensis and capitalis. It was a similar size to subspecies canadensis, and had a wholly white head with a black nape. Its body markings resembled those of capitalis but its coloration resembled canadensis.[13]
  • P. c. canadensis, the nominate subspecies, breeds from northern British Columbia east to Prince Edward Island, and south to the northern reaches of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Vermont, and New Hampshire, as well as northeastern New York and Maine. It winters at lower altitudes within the breeding range and south to southern Ontario and Massachusetts, and is an occasional visitor to central Minnesota, southeastern Wisconsin, northwestern Pennsylvania, and central New York. P. c. canadensis is also a vagrant to northeastern Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).[12]
  • P. c. capitalis is found in the southern Rocky Mountains from eastern Idaho, south-central Montana, and western and southern Wyoming south through eastern Utah, and western and central Colorado, to east-central Arizona and north-central New Mexico.[12] American naturalist Spencer Fullerton Baird described this subspecies in 1873. It has a wholly whitish head with a pale band on the back of the neck, and overall more ashy grey plumage.[14] It is also generally larger than the nominate subspecies canadensis.[13]
  • P. c. griseus occurs from southwestern British Columbia and Vancouver Island south through central Washington and central Oregon to the mountains of north-central and northeastern California. It was described by Robert Ridgway in 1899.[12]
  • P. c. nigricapillus, also known as the Labrador jay,[15] is found in northern Quebec (Kuujjuaq, Whale River, and George River), throughout Labrador and Nova Scotia, and in southeastern Quebec (Mingan and Blanc-Sablon). It was described by Ridgway in 1882.[12]
  • P. c. obscurus, described by Ridgway in 1874, is native to the coastal strip from Washington (Crescent Lake, Seattle, and Columbia River) through western Oregon to northwestern California (Humboldt County).[12] Also known as the Oregon jay,[16] this subspecies has more dark brown than grey upperparts.[14]
  • P. c. pacificus ranges from central Alaska to northwestern Canada, including the Yukon and along the Mackenzie River. It was described by Johann Friedrich Gmelin in 1788.[10]
  • P. c. sanfordi is found in Newfoundland.[10] Harry C. Oberholser described it in 1914 from a specimen collected by a Dr. Sanford, whom he named it after. Oberholser reported that it was smaller and darker than the nominate race P. c. canadensis and more closely resembled P. c. nigricapillus.[17]

Two additional subspecies were formerly recognized:

  • P. c. arcus was the name given to populations that are found in the Rainbow Mountains area and headwaters of the Dean and Bella Coola Rivers of the central Coast Ranges, British Columbia.[12] Described by Miller in 1950, it is often recognized as P. c. obscurus.[10]
  • P. c. barbouri was described by Allan Brooks in 1920.[12] Abundant on Anticosti Island in eastern Quebec, this subspecies is significantly heavier but not larger than other Canada jay subspecies in Quebec, and does not appear to be genetically distinct from P. c. nigricapillus[10] or other populations in Quebec.[18]

Description

The Canada jay is a relatively large songbird, though smaller than other jays. A typical adult Canada jay is between 25 and 33 cm (9.8 and 13.0 in) long. Its wingspan is around 45 cm (18 in). It weighs about 65 to 70 g (2.3 to 2.5 oz). Adults have medium grey back feathers with a lighter grey underside. Its head is mostly white with a dark grey or black nape and hood, with a short black beak and dark eyes. The long tail is medium grey with lighter tips.[19] The legs and feet are black.[20] The plumage is thick, providing insulation in the bird's cold native habitat.[21] Like most corvids, Canada jays are not sexually dimorphic, but males are slightly larger than females. Juveniles are initially coloured very dark grey all over, gaining adult plumage after a first moult in July or August.[22] The average lifespan of territory-owning Canada jays is eight years;[21] the oldest known Canada jay banded and recaptured in the wild was at least 17 years old.[22]

A variety of vocalizations are used and, like other corvids, Canada jays may mimic other bird species, especially predators. Calls include a whistled quee-oo, and various clicks and chuckles. When predators are spotted, the bird announces a series of harsh clicks to signal a threat on the ground, or a series of repeated whistles to indicate a predator in the air.[21]

Distribution and habitat

Perisoreus canadensis obscurus in Mount Rainier National Park

The Canada jay's range spans across northern North America, from northern Alaska east to Newfoundland and Labrador, and south to northern California, Idaho, Utah, east-central Arizona, north-central New Mexico, central Colorado, and southwestern South Dakota. It is also found in the northern reaches of the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, the Adirondacks in New York, and New England. The Canada jay may wander north of the breeding range. In winter it travels irregularly to northwestern Nebraska, central Minnesota, southeastern Wisconsin, central Michigan, southern Pennsylvania, central New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts.[12][23] Fossil evidence indicates the Canada jay was found as far south as Tennessee during the last ice age.[24]

The vast majority of Canada jays live where there is a strong presence of black spruce (Picea mariana), white spruce (P. glauca), Engelmann spruce (P. engelmannii), jack pine (Pinus banksiana), or lodgepole pine (P. contorta). Canada jays do not inhabit the snowy, coniferous, and therefore seemingly appropriate Sierra Nevada of California where no spruce occur. Nor do Canada jays live in lower elevations of coastal Alaska or British Columbia dominated by Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). The key habitat requirements may be sufficiently cold temperatures to ensure successful storage of perishable food and tree bark with sufficiently pliable scales arranged in a shingle-like configuration that allows Canada jays to wedge food items easily up into dry, concealed storage locations. Storage may also be assisted by the antibacterial properties of the bark and foliage of boreal tree species. An exception to this general picture may be the well-marked subspecies P. c. obscurus. It lives right down to the coast from Washington to northern California in the absence of cold temperatures or the putatively necessary tree species.[23]

Behaviour

Mating

The Canada jay typically breeds at two years of age. Monogamous, pairs remain together for life, though a bird will pair up with a new partner if it is widowed.[23] Breeding takes place during March and April, depending on latitude,[23][25][26] in permanent, all-purpose territories.[23][25][26][27] Second broods are not attempted, perhaps allowing greater time for food storage.[23][25]

Grey, sooty plumage of a juvenile

Breeding is cooperative.[26][28][29] During the nest-building phase of the breeding season, Canada jay breeding pairs are accompanied by a third, juvenile bird. A 1991 field study in Quebec and Ontario found that approximately 65% of Canada jay trios included a dominant juvenile from the pair's previous breeding season, and approximately 30% of trios included non-dominant juveniles who had left their parents' territory. Occasionally, two nonbreeding juveniles accompany a pair of adults. The role of juveniles is in allofeeding (food sharing) by retrieving caches and bringing food to younger siblings,[28][29] but this is only allowed by the parents during the post-fledgling period.[26][28][29] Until then, parents will drive the other birds away from the nest. This may reduce the frequency of predator-attracting visits to the nest when young are most vulnerable. The benefits of juveniles participating in subsequent brood care may include "lightening the load" for the breeding pair, which may possibly increase longevity, reducing the probability of starvation of nestlings, and detecting and mobbing predators near the nest.[28] Dominant juveniles may eventually inherit the natal territory and breed, while unrelated juveniles may eventually fill a vacancy nearby or form a new breeding pair on previously unoccupied ground.[26]

Nesting

Female incubating her eggs

Breeding Canada jays build nests and lay eggs in March or even February, when snow is deep in the boreal forest.[23][25] Male Canada jays choose a nest site in a mature conifer tree;[27] the nests are found most commonly in black spruce, with white spruce and balsam fir (Abies balsamea) also used, in Ontario and Quebec.[23][25] With the male taking a lead role in construction,[23] nests are constructed with brittle dead twigs pulled off of trees, as well as bark strips and lichens. The cup is just large enough to contain the female and her eggs,[21] measuring about 3 in (76 mm) wide and 2 in (51 mm) deep.[22] Insulation is provided by cocoons of the forest tent caterpillar (Malacosoma disstria) filling the interstitial spaces of the nest, and feathers used to line the cup.[22][23] Nests are usually built on the southwestern side of a tree for solar warming and are usually less than one nest diameter from the trunk.[25] Nest height is typically 8 to 30 ft (2.4 to 9.1 m) above the ground.[25] The average height of 264 nests surveyed in Algonquin Provincial Park was 16 ± 9.2 ft (4.9 ± 2.8 m) above ground.[25]

A clutch consists of 2 to 5 light green-grey eggs with darker spots.[20] The mean clutch sizes of Canada jays in Algonquin Provincial Park and La Verendrye Provincial Park were 3.03 and 3.18 eggs, respectively. Incubation is performed only by the female[25] and lasts an average of 18.5 days.[23] The female is fed on the nest by her partner, rarely moving from the nest during incubation and for several days after hatching.[25]

Fledging

A hatchling

Canada jay young are altricial. For the first three to four days after hatching, the female remains on the nest; when the male arrives with food, both parents help in feeding the nestlings.[25] Nestling growth is most rapid from the fourth through the tenth day following hatching, during which time the female begins to participate in foraging. The parents carry food to the nest in their throats.[23][25] The accompanying nonbreeding third bird does not help with feeding during this period but is driven away by the parents if it approaches the nest.[28][29] Food is a dark brown, viscous paste containing primarily arthropods.[23][25] Young Canada jays leave the nest between 22 and 24 days after hatching, after which the third bird begins to participate in foraging and feeding.[23] Natal dispersal distance for the Canada jay is a median of 0.0 km for males, 2.8 km (1.7 mi) for females, and a maximum distance of 11.3 km (7.0 mi) for males and females.[26]

After 55 to 65 days, juveniles reach full adult measurements and battle among themselves until a dominant juvenile forces its siblings to leave the natal area.[30] The dominant bird remains with its parents until the following season, while its siblings leave the natal territory to join an unrelated pair who failed to breed. In a study by Dan Strickland, two-thirds of dominant juveniles were male.[26]

Survival

In studies conducted in Ontario and Quebec, the mortality rate for dominant juveniles was 52%, and mortality was 85% for juveniles who left the parents' territory between fledging in June to approximately mid-October. From fall to the following breeding season in March, further juvenile mortality was 50%. Territory-holding adult Canada jays experienced low mortality rates (15.1 and 18.2% for males and females, respectively).[26] The oldest known Canada jay recaptured in the wild was at least 17 years old.[22]

Feeding

Canada jays are omnivorous.[23][25] They hunt such prey as arthropods,[23] small mammals including rodents,[31] and nestling birds,[32][33][34] and have even been recorded taking a magnolia warbler (Dendroica magnolia) in flight.[35] They have been reported to opportunistically hunt young amphibians such as the western chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) in Chambers Lake, Colorado,[36] and the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) in Whitehorse Bluff in Crater Lake National Park, Oregon.[37] Canada jays have been seen landing on moose (Alces alces) to remove and eat engorged winter ticks (Dermacentor albipictus) during April and May in Algonquin Provincial Park. Researchers also found a Canada jay nest containing a brooding female, three hatchlings, and three warm, engorged winter deer ticks. Because the ticks were too large for the hatchlings to eat, it was hypothesized that the ticks may have served as "hot water bottles", keeping hatchlings warm when parents were away from the nest.[38]

Nestling birds are common prey,[34][39] being taken more often from nests in trees rather than on the ground.[32] Canada jays find them by moving from perch to perch and scanning surroundings.[23] Avian nest predation by Canada jays is not necessarily higher in fragmented versus unfragmented forest.[32][33][34] Evidence from studies in the Pacific Northwest suggest a moderate increase in nest predation in logged plots adjacent to mature conifer forest, which is the Canada jay's preferred habitat.[23][25] Studies of nest predation by Canada jays in Quebec have shown that the birds prefer preying on nests in open forest with high prominence of jack pine,[32] and greater rates of predation in riparian forest strips and green-tree retention stands versus clearcuts.[40] This may be due to increased availability of perch sites for avian predators such as the Canada jay.[34] Canada jays are suspected but not proven to prey on nests of the threatened marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in coastal areas of the Pacific Northwest.[39]

Carrion,[23][25] fungi,[23] fruits such as chokecherry (Prunus virginiana),[25] and seeds[25] are also eaten. Two Canada jays were seen eating slime mold (Fuligo septica) near Kennedy Hot Springs in the Glacier Peak Wilderness, Washington. This was the first report of any bird consuming slime mold in the field.[41] Risk and energy expenditure are factors in food selection for the Canada jay, which selects food on the basis of profitability to maximize caloric intake. Increased handling, searching, or recognition times for a preferred food item lowers its profitability.[42] Canada jays wrench, twist, and tug food apart, unlike other birds known as jays (such as the blue jay, Cyanocitta cristata), which grasp and hammer their food.[22] Canada jays commonly carry large food items to nearby trees to eat or process for storage, possibly as defense against large scavengers.[23]

Caching

Pair of jays feeding their nestlings

The Canada jay is a "scatterhoarder", caching thousands of food items during the summer for use the following winter,[42] and enabling the species to remain in boreal and subalpine forests year round.[23] Any food intended for storage is manipulated in the mouth and formed into a bolus that is coated with sticky saliva, adhering to anything it touches.[43] The bolus is stored in bark crevices, under tufts of lichen, or among conifer needles. Cached items can be anything from carrion to bread crumbs.[25] A single Canada jay may hide thousands of pieces of food per year, to later recover them by memory, sometimes months after hiding them.[25] Cached food is sometimes used to feed nestlings and fledglings.[25]

When exploiting distant food sources found in clearings, Canada jays were observed temporarily concentrating their caches in an arboreal site along the edge of a black spruce forest in interior Alaska. This allowed a high rate of caching in the short term and reduced the jay's risk of predation. A subsequent recaching stage occurred, and food items were transferred to widely scattered sites to reduce theft.[44]

Caching is inhibited by the presence of Steller's jays (Cyanocitta stelleri)[45] and Canada jays from adjacent territories,[46][47] which follow resident Canada jays to steal cached food.[45] Canada jays carry large food items to distant cache sites for storage more often than small food items. To prevent theft, they also tend to carry valuable food items further from the source when caching in the company of one or more Canada jays.[47] Scatterhoarding discourages pilferage by competitors, while increased cache density leads to increased thievery.[46] In southern portions of the Canada jay's range, food is not cached during summer because of the chance of spoilage and the reduced need for winter stores.[23]

Predators

Several bird species prey on Canada jays, including great grey owls (Strix nebulosa), northern hawk-owls (Surnia ulula),[48] and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida).[49] Canada jay remains have been recovered from the lairs of fisher (Pekania pennanti) and American marten (Martes americana).[50] Red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) eat Canada jay eggs.[25] Canada jays alert each other to threats by whistling alarm notes, screaming, chattering, or imitating and/or mobbing predators.[23]

Relationship with humans

Cultural significance

A bold Canada jay, typical of those individuals accustomed to humans

Found throughout Canada, the bird is popularly known by several colloquial names. One is "whisky jack",[21] a variation on the name of Wisakedjak, a benevolent trickster and cultural hero in Cree, Algonquin, and Menominee mythologies.[51] Alternate spellings for this name include wesakechak, wiskedjak, whiskachon, and wisakadjak.[52] The Tlingit people of northwestern North America know it as kooyéix or taatl'eeshdéi, "camp robber".[53] According to the Mi'kmaq of Nova Scotia, each of the seven stars of the Big Dipper depicted a different bird; the star Eta Ursae Majoris in the night sky was a Canada jay, Mikjaqoqwej.[54] In anishinaabemowin, or the Ojibwe language, the bird is known as gwiingwiishi.[55] "... the whisky jack is revered by indigenous peoples as an omen of good fortune and a warning of danger. Niigaanwewidam Sinclair, an associate professor and acting head of the department of native studies at the University of Manitoba, explained why the mischievous yet wise grey jay is important to the Anishinaabe people. "To my people, the Anishinaabe, she is Gwiingwiishi", Sinclair said in a post published by Canadian Geographic magazine. "Gwiingwiishi is a great, wise teacher, and there is an old story that tells of her abilities to give gifts... Her lesson? That it is only in our bravery, resilience and commitments to one another that we can find growth", Sinclair said.[56]

The Canada jay readily capitalizes on novel food sources, including taking advantage of man-made sources of food. To the frustration of trappers using baits to catch fur-bearing animals or early travelers trying to protect their winter food supplies, and to the delight of campers, bold Canada jays are known to approach humans for treats and to steal from unattended food stores. Canada jays do not change their feeding behaviour if watched by people;[42] if they are able to link humans with food, they will not forget. A nesting female that had become accustomed to being fed by humans was reportedly able to be enticed to leave the nest during incubation and brooding.[25] This behaviour has inspired a number of nicknames for the Canada jay, including "lumberjack", "meat-bird", "venison-hawk", "moose-bird", and "gorby",[21][57] the last two popular in the northeastern United States. The origin of "gorby", also spelt "gorbey", is unclear but possibly derived from gorb, which in Scottish Gaelic or Irish means "glutton" or "greedy (animal)" or in Scots or northern English "fledgling bird".[58] Superstition in Maine and New Brunswick relates how woodsmen would not harm gorbeys, believing that whatever they inflicted on the bird would be done to them. A folk tale circulated about a man who plucked a gorbey of its feathers and woke up the next morning having lost all his hair. Although the story was widespread in the early to mid-20th century, it does not appear to have been extant in 1902.[58]

In January 2015, The Royal Canadian Geographical Society's magazine, Canadian Geographic, announced a project to select a national bird for Canada, a designation which the country has never formally recognized.[59] Dubbed the National Bird Project, the organization conducted an online poll inviting Canadians to vote for their favourite bird.[60] The poll closed on 31 August 2016, and a panel of experts convened the following month to review the top five selections: the Canada jay, common loon (Gavia immer), snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus), Canada goose (Branta canadensis) and black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus).[61] The project announced on 16 November 2016 that the Canada jay was selected as the winner of the contest.[62][63] Organizers hoped for the Canadian government to formally recognize the result as part of Canada's sesquicentennial celebrations in 2017; the Department of Canadian Heritage responded that no new official symbol proposals were being considered at the time.[64]

Conservation

Canada jays are classified as least concern (LC) according to the IUCN Red List,[1] having stable populations over a very large area of boreal and subalpine habitats only lightly occupied by humans. Significant human impacts may nevertheless occur through anthropogenic climate warming. Canada jays at the northern edges of their range may benefit from the extension of spruce stands out onto formerly treeless tundra. A study of a declining population at the southern end of the Canada jay's range linked the decline in reproductive success to warmer temperatures in preceding autumns.[65] Such warm temperatures may trigger spoilage of the perishable food items stored by Canada jays upon which success of late winter nesting partly depends.[66]

References

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from Perisoreus canadensis. United States Department of Agriculture.

  1. ^ a b BirdLife International (2018). "Perisoreus canadensis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2018: e.T22705783A130380194. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T22705783A130380194.en. Retrieved 19 November 2021.
  2. ^ Brisson, Mathurin Jacques (1760). Ornithologie, ou, Méthode contenant la division des oiseaux en ordres, sections, genres, especes & leurs variétés (in French and Latin). Vol. 2. Paris: Jean-Baptiste Bauche. pp. 54–55, Plate 4 fig 2. The two stars (**) at the start of the section indicates that Brisson based his description on the examination of a specimen.
  3. ^ a b Allen, J.A. (1910). "Collation of Brisson's genera of birds with those of Linnaeus". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 28: 317–335. hdl:2246/678.
  4. ^ Linnaeus, Carl (1766). Systema naturae : per regna tria natura, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (in Latin). Vol. 1, Part 1 (12th ed.). Holmiae (Stockholm): Laurentii Salvii. p. 158.
  5. ^ Richardson, John; Swainson, William; Kirby, William (1831). Fauna Boreali-americana, or, The Zoology of the Northern Parts of British America: The birds. J. Murray. p. 495.
  6. ^ Bonaparte, Charles L. (1838). A geographical and comparative list of the birds of Europe and North America. London: J. Van Voorst. p. 27.
  7. ^ Ericson, Per G. P.; Jansén, Anna-Lee; Johansson, Ulf S.; Ekman, Jan (2005). "Inter-generic relationships of the crows, jays, magpies and allied groups (Aves: Corvidae) based on nucleotide sequence data" (PDF). Journal of Avian Biology. 36 (3): 222–234. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.493.5531. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.03409.x.
  8. ^ a b c van Els, Paul; Cicero, Carla; Klicka, John (2012). "High latitudes and high genetic diversity: Phylogeography of a widespread boreal bird, the gray jay (Perisoreus canadensis)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 63 (2): 456–65. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.019. PMID 22321688.
  9. ^ Chesser, R. Terry; Burns, Kevin J.; Cicero, Carla; Dunn, John L.; Kratter, Andrew W; Lovette, Irby J; Rasmussen, Pamela C.; Remsen, J.V. Jr; Stotz, Douglas F.; Winger, Benjamin M.; Winker, Kevin (2018). "Fifty-ninth supplement to the American Ornithological Society's Check-list of North American Birds". The Auk. 135 (3): 798–813. doi:10.1642/AUK-18-62.1.
  10. ^ a b c d e f Gill, Frank; Donsker, David, eds. (2019). "Crows, mudnesters & birds-of-paradise". World Bird List Version 9.2. International Ornithologists' Union. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
  11. ^ "Perisoreus canadensis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j American Ornithologists' Union (1957). Checklist of North American birds. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Lord Baltimore Press, Inc.
  13. ^ a b Miller, Alden H. (1933). "The Canada Jays of Northern Idaho". Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History. 7 (25): 287–98.
  14. ^ a b Ridgway, Robert (1873). "The birds of Colorado". Bulletin of the Essex Institute. 5 (11): 194–95.
  15. ^ "Labrador jay". Avibase. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  16. ^ Hoffmann, Ralph (1927). Birds of the Pacific States. illustrations by Major Allan Brooks. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Riverside Press. p. 224. OCLC 883734034.
  17. ^ Oberholser, Harry Church (1914). "Four new birds from Newfoundland". Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 27: 43–54 [49–50].
  18. ^ Strickland, Dan; Norris, Ryan (2015). "An example of phenotypic adherence to the island rule? – Anticosti gray jays are heavier but not structurally larger than mainland conspecifics". Ecology and Evolution. 5 (17): 3687–94. doi:10.1002/ece3.1557. PMC 4567872. PMID 26380697.
  19. ^ Burrows, Roger; Kagume, Krista; Adams, Carmen (2005). Compact Guide to Atlantic Canada Birds. Lone Pine Publishing. pp. 118–119. ISBN 978-1-55105-473-5.
  20. ^ a b Chester, Sharon (2016). The Arctic Guide: Wildlife of the Far North. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 304. ISBN 978-1-4008-6596-3.
  21. ^ a b c d e f "Gray Jay". Hinterland Who's Who. Canadian Wildlife Federation & Environment and Climate Change Canada. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  22. ^ a b c d e f "Canada Jay". All About Birds. Cornell University. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  23. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Strickland, Dan; Ouellet, Henri. (1993). Canada Jay. In: Poole, A.; Stettenheim, P.; Gill, F., eds. Birds of North America, No. 40. Philadelphia, PA: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, DC: The American Ornithologists' Union.
  24. ^ Parmalee, Paul W.; Klipper, Walter E. (1982). "Evidence of a boreal avifauna in middle Tennessee during the late Pleistocene" (PDF). Auk. 99: 365–68.
  25. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Rutter, Russell J. (1969). "A contribution to the biology of the Grey Jay (Perisoreus canadensis)". Canadian Field-Naturalist. 83 (4): 300–316.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h Strickland, Dan (1991). "Juvenile dispersal in Grey Jays: dominant brood member expels siblings from natal territory". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 69 (12): 2935–2945. doi:10.1139/z91-414.
  27. ^ a b Hobson, Keith A.; Schieck, Jim (1999). "Changes in bird communities in boreal mixedwood forest: harvest and wildfire effects over 30 years". Ecological Applications. 9 (3): 849–863. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0849:CIBCIB]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 2641334. S2CID 28285190.
  28. ^ a b c d e Strickland, Dan; Waite, Thomas A. (2001). "Does initial suppression of allofeeding in small jays help to conceal their nests?". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 79 (12): 2128–2146. doi:10.1139/cjz-79-12-2128.
  29. ^ a b c d Waite, Thomas A.; Strickland, Dan (1997). "Cooperative breeding in Grey Jays: philopatric offspring provision juvenile siblings". The Condor. 99 (2): 523–525. doi:10.2307/1369960. JSTOR 1369960.
  30. ^ Ha, James C.; Lehner, Philip N. (1990). "Notes on Grey Jay demographics in Colorado". The Wilson Bulletin. 102 (4): 698–702. JSTOR 4162942.
  31. ^ Lesher, Fred; Lesher, Jolene (1984). "Gray Jay takes live mammal". The Loon. 56 (1): 72–73.
  32. ^ a b c d Boulet, Marylene; Darveau, Marcel; Belanger, Louis (2000). "A landscape perspective of bird nest predation in a managed boreal black spruce forest". Écoscience. 7 (3): 281–289. doi:10.1080/11956860.2000.11682597. S2CID 82863885.
  33. ^ a b Stuart-Smith, A.; Hayes, John P. (2003). "Influence of residual tree density on predation of artificial and natural songbird nests". Forest Ecology and Management. 183 (1–3): 159. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00104-X.
  34. ^ a b c d Vega, Robyn M. S. (1993). Bird communities in managed conifer stands in the Oregon Cascades: habitat associations and nest predation. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. Thesis
  35. ^ Barnard, William H. (1996). "Juvenile Grey Jay preys upon magnolia warbler" (PDF). Journal of Field Ornithology. 67 (2): 252–253.
  36. ^ Tordoff, Walter (1980). "Selective predation of Gray Jays, Perisoreus canadensis, upon Boreal Chorus Frogs, Pseudacris triseriata". Evolution. 34 (5): 1004–08. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04039.x. JSTOR 2408008. PMID 28581143. S2CID 5382248.
  37. ^ Murray, Michael P.; Pearl, Christopher A.; Bury, R. Bruce (2005). "Apparent predation by Gray Jays, Perisoreus canadensis, on Long-toed Salamanders, Ambystoma macrodactylum, in the Oregon Cascade Range". Canadian Field-Naturalist. 119 (2): 291–92. doi:10.22621/cfn.v119i2.116.
  38. ^ Addison, E. M.; Strickland, R. D.; Fraser, D. J. H. (1989). "Gray Jays, Perisoreus canadensis, and common ravens, Corvus corax, as predators of winter ticks, Dermacentor albipictus". Canadian Field-Naturalist. 103 (3): 406–408.
  39. ^ a b Raphael, Martin G.; Mack, Diane Evans; Marzluff, John M.; Luginbuhl, John M. (2002). "Effects of forest fragmentation on populations of the marbled murrelet". Studies in Avian Biology. 25: 221–235.
  40. ^ Darveau, Marcel; Belanger, Louis; Huot, Jean; Melancon, Eric; DeBellefeuille, Sonia (1997). "Forestry practices and the risk of bird nest predation in a boreal coniferous forest". Ecological Monographs. 7 (2): 572–580. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0572:FPATRO]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 2269522.
  41. ^ Sutherland, John B.; Crawford, Ronald L (1979). "Gray Jay feeding on slime mold". The Murrelet. 60 (1): 28.
  42. ^ a b c Maccarone, Alan D.; Montevecchi, W. A. (1986). "Factors affecting food choice by Grey Jays". Bird Behavior. 6 (2): 90–92. doi:10.3727/015613886792195216.
  43. ^ Dow, Douglas D. (April 1965). "The Role of Saliva in Food Storage by the Gray Jay". The Auk. 82 (2): 139–154. doi:10.2307/4082929. JSTOR 4082929.
  44. ^ Waite, Thomas A.; Reeve, John D. (1997). "Multistage scatter-hoarding decisions in the Grey Jay (Perisoreus canadensis)". Bird Behavior. 12 (1/2): 7–14. doi:10.3727/015613897797141335.
  45. ^ a b Burnell, Kristi L.; Tomback, Diane F. (1985). "Steller's jays steal Grey Jay caches: field and laboratory observation". The Auk. 102 (2): 417–419. doi:10.2307/4086793. JSTOR 4086793.
  46. ^ a b Waite, Thomas A. (1988). "A field test of density-dependent survival of simulated Grey Jay caches". The Condor. 90 (1): 247–249. doi:10.2307/1368458. JSTOR 1368458.
  47. ^ a b Waite, Thomas A. (1992). "Social hoarding and a load size-distance relationship in Grey Jays". The Condor. 94 (4): 995–998. doi:10.2307/1369297. JSTOR 1369297. S2CID 86971311.
  48. ^ Rohner, Christoph; Smith, James N. M.; Stroman, Johan; Joyce, Miranda; Doyle, Frank I.; Boonstra, Rudy (1995). "Northern Hawk-Owls in the Nearctic boreal forest: prey selection and population consequences of multiple prey cycles". The Condor. 97 (1): 208–220. doi:10.2307/1368997. JSTOR 1368997.
  49. ^ U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (1995). Recovery plan for the Mexican spotted owl. Vol. 1–2. Albuquerque, NM.
  50. ^ Henry, Stephen E.; Raphael, Martin G.; Ruggiero, Leonard F. (1990). "Food caching and handling by marten". The Great Basin Naturalist. 50 (4): 381–383. PDF copy
  51. ^ "Legendary Native American Figures: Wisakedjak (Wesakechak)". Native Languages of the Americas. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  52. ^ MacKinnon, Bobbi-Jean (23 November 2016). "CBC's spelling of grey jay causes some readers to squawk". CBC News. Retrieved 27 November 2016.
  53. ^ Sonia Tidemann; Andrew Gosler (2010). Ethno-ornithology: Birds, Indigenous Peoples, Culture and Society. Earthscan. p. 199. ISBN 978-1-84977-475-8.
  54. ^ Harris, Prune; Bartlett, Cheryl; Marshall, Murdena; Marshall, Albert (2010). "Mi'kmaq Night Sky Stories; Patterns of Interconnectiveness, Vitality and Nourishment" (PDF). CAP Journal (9): 14–17. Bibcode:2010CAPJ....9...14H.
  55. ^ "The Ojibwe People's Dictionary". ojibwe.lib.umn.edu. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  56. ^ "Canadians divided over grey jay as national bird, new poll suggests". Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  57. ^ "Alaska's Backyard Birds – Jays". Alaska Department of Fish and Game. State of Alaska. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  58. ^ a b Ives, Edward D. (1961). "The Man Who Plucked the Gorbey: A Maine Woods Legend". Journal of American Folklore. 74 (291): 1–8. doi:10.2307/538195. JSTOR 538195.
  59. ^ Austen, Ian (6 December 2016). "A Proposal for a Canadian National Bird Ruffles Feathers". The New York Times. Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  60. ^ Galloway, Gloria (22 January 2015). "Race is on to pick the national bird of Canada". The Globe and Mail. Ottawa. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
  61. ^ "Welcome to the National Bird Project". National Bird Project. Canadian Geographic. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
  62. ^ "Step aside, loon: Geographic society plucks Canada jay as Canada's national bird". CTV News. Bell Media. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
  63. ^ Stone, Laura (16 November 2016). "Grey jay gets nod for Canada's national bird". The Globe and Mail.
  64. ^ Sanderson, Blair (2 July 2017). "Canada isn't getting a national bird after all". CBC News. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  65. ^ Waite, Thomas A.; Strickland, Dan (2006). "Climate change and the demographic demise of a hoarding bird living on the edge". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 273 (1603): 2809–13. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3667. PMC 1664634. PMID 17015367.
  66. ^ Berger, Cynthia (1 February 2008). "Winter's Early Birds". National Wildlife. National Wildlife Federation. 46 (2): 46. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Canada jay: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The Canada jay (Perisoreus canadensis), also known as the gray jay, grey jay, camp robber, or whisky jack, is a passerine bird of the family Corvidae. It is found in boreal forests of North America north to the tree line, and in the Rocky Mountains subalpine zone south to New Mexico and Arizona. A fairly large songbird, the Canada jay has pale grey underparts, darker grey upperparts, and a grey-white head with a darker grey nape. It is one of three members of the genus Perisoreus, a genus more closely related to the magpie genus Cyanopica than to other birds known as jays. The Canada jay itself has nine recognized subspecies.

Canada jays live year-round on permanent territories in coniferous forests, surviving in winter months on food cached throughout their territory in warmer periods. The birds form monogamous mating pairs, with pairs accompanied on their territories by a third juvenile from the previous season. Canada jays adapt to human activity in their territories and are known to approach humans for food, inspiring a list of colloquial names including "lumberjack", "camp robber", and "venison-hawk". The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) considers the Canada jay a least-concern species, but populations in southern ranges may be affected adversely by global warming.

The species is associated with mythological figures of several First Nations cultures, including Wisakedjak, a benevolent figure whose name was anglicized to Whiskyjack. In 2016, an online poll and expert panel conducted by Canadian Geographic magazine selected the Canada jay as the national bird of Canada, although the designation is not formally recognized.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN