dcsimg

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

provided by AnAge articles
Maximum longevity: 5.2 years (captivity)
license
cc-by-3.0
copyright
Joao Pedro de Magalhaes
editor
de Magalhaes, J. P.
partner site
AnAge articles

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

There is no evidence hispid cotton rats are economically beneficial.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats can greatly reduce crop production. They cause damage to a variety of crops, including cotton, rice, alfalfa, grains, vegetables, fruits, squash, sugarcane, corn, sweet potatoes, and melons. Crop damage is directly related to population densities, which vary by year and by season. Dense populations of hispid cotton rats also cause damage to canal banks.

Negative Impacts: crop pest

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Conservation Status

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Over much of their range hispid cottons rats are common and populations are stable. In Kentucky hispid cotton rats are listed as vulnerable because they occur in only a portion of the state, in portions of just 8 counties in the southwestern and southeastern corners.

US Federal List: no special status

CITES: no special status

State of Michigan List: no special status

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: least concern

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Behavior

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Little information regarding communication of hispid cotton rats has been reported. One article mentions communication when young were being handled by researchers. The young made a squeaking sound alerting an adult to come close to researchers. However, like most mammals, hispid cotton rats have a keen sense of smell and hearing.

Perception Channels: visual ; tactile ; acoustic ; chemical

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Associations

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats are prey for many larger animals such as foxes, dogs, coyotes, weasels, raccoons, minks, domestic cats, bobcats,, hawks, and snakes. This makes them an important food source. Some researchers suggest that their abundance and availability as prey means they are a buffer between predators and game animals. In the piedmont and coastal plains of North Carolina cotton rats appear to be an important food source to bobcats, ranking first or second in frequency of occurrence in their stomachs. Hispid cotton rats have an important relationship with bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) because they compete with quail for food resources and feed on the quail eggs. Hispid cotton rats do not feed on all quail nests at one time, suggesting an adaptive reason for staggered quail breeding. This staggering may actually benefit quail for reasons other than predation by Sigmodon hispidus; all nests may not be not subjected to the same adverse weather and environmental conditions as others. In addition, hispid cotton rats are host to many internal and external parasites. External parasites are hosts to mites, ticks, lice, and fleas. They are also hosts to cestode species (Choanotaenia nebraskensis, Hymenolepis diminuta, Raillietina bakeri, Taenia taeniaeformis), bacteria (Rickettsia rickettsii), nematodes (Longistriata adunca, Physaloptera hispida, Mastophorus muris), and ascarid worms.

Commensal/Parasitic Species:

  • cestodes (Choanotaenia nebraskensis)
  • cestodes (Hymenolepis diminuta)
  • cestodes (Raillietina bakeri)
  • cestodes (Taenia taeniaeformis)
  • bacteria (Rickettsia rickettsii)
  • nematodes (Longistriata adunca)
  • nematodes (Physaloptera hispida)
  • nematodes (Mastophorus muris)
  • ascarid worms (Ascarididae)
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Trophic Strategy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats are folivorous, granivorous, and lignivorous. In addition they feed on the eggs and young of ground-nesting birds, insects, crayfish, fiddler crabs, and carrion where possible. They do not cache food. When feeding on tall plants they cut down the plant near its base then cut the whole plant into smaller sections. They drink water but do not require a permanent water source in their habitat.

Animal Foods: eggs; carrion ; insects; aquatic crustaceans

Plant Foods: leaves; roots and tubers; wood, bark, or stems; seeds, grains, and nuts; fruit

Primary Diet: herbivore (Folivore , Granivore , Lignivore)

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Distribution

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats have an extensive range. The southern range reaches northern South America in Peru, Ecuador, Columbia, Venezuela, Guyana, French Guiana, and Brazil. The range extends northward through central America and Mexico. In the United States, they are found as far north as Nebraska in the west and coastal and central Virginia to the east. There is also an isolated population in southeastern California in the Imperial Valley along the Colorado River. However, since Sigmodon hispidus was separated genetically from Sigmodon arizonae in recent years, it's unclear whether this California population is indeed Sigmodon hispidus.

In the past 50 to 100 years hispid cotton rats have been extending their range northward and to higher elevations. Genoways and Schlitter (1966) observed that hispid cotton rats moved northward in Nebraska. In 2002, Dunnum et al. observed that they were extending their range into higher elevations in New Mexico. As recently as 2008 (Francl and Meikle, 2009), they were captured in central Virginia - the first record of this species in the Ridge and Valley province. They may also be moving westward in Virginia.

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native ); neotropical (Native )

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Habitat

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats prefer dense, grassy areas. They are most commonly captured in grassy fields, brushy pastures, canal banks, roadsides, and edges of cultivated fields overgrown with weeds and other brushy vegetation such as broomsedge and honeysuckle. They occasionally have been observed in areas of dense cacti, salt marshes, and in grasslands bordering brackish waters. In Kansas, grasslands are the most common habitat in which they are trapped, but they also have been found in open wetland habitats, in agricultural fields, and in "planted plum-cedar woodlands" (Rehmeier et al. 2005). In Mexico, hispid cotton rats range from sea level to 1130 m in elevation. In radiotelemetry studies, Cameron and Spencer (2008) found that reproductively active females spent more time in habitats that were a mix of monocots and dicots, and actually avoided all-dicot patches. Males show no preference.

Range elevation: 0 to 1130 m.

Habitat Regions: temperate ; tropical ; terrestrial

Terrestrial Biomes: savanna or grassland

Other Habitat Features: agricultural

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Life Expectancy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats, like many rodents, are not long lived in the wild. Few cotton rats (13.2%) live beyond six months. The oldest recorded Sigmodon species individual lived 12 months in the wild. In captivity, the oldest hispid cotton rat recorded is five years, two months old.

Range lifespan
Status: wild:
12 (high) months.

Range lifespan
Status: captivity:
62 (high) months.

Average lifespan
Status: wild:
6 months.

Average lifespan
Status: captivity:
5.2 years.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Morphology

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats are small to medium sized rodents, with adults weighing 100 to 225 g (average 159 g). Total length ranges from 80 to 320 mm, with males slightly longer than females. Regional size variation exists; hispid cotton rats in Virginia are smaller than those found in North and South Carolina. The color of both sexes consists of a mixture of tan, brown, and black fur on their dorsal parts, giving them a coarse, or "hispid," appearance. The underparts are white to greyish, the tail is sparsely haired and considerably shorter than the combined length of the head and body. Regional variation in color is common, hispid cotton rats from the Coastal Plain of North and South Carolina are darker than those from Maryland and Virginia. An additional characteristic feature of Sigmodon hispidus is the s-shaped crown pattern on the second and third molars. The dental formula is I 1/1, C 0/0, O 0/0, M 3/3 = 16.

Range mass: 100 to 225 g.

Average mass: 159 g.

Range length: 224 to 365 mm.

Average length: 295 mm.

Range basal metabolic rate: 0.96/g to 2.89/g cm3.O2/g/hr.

Average basal metabolic rate: 1.33/g cm3.O2/g/hr.

Other Physical Features: endothermic ; homoiothermic; bilateral symmetry

Sexual Dimorphism: male larger

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Associations

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Hispid cotton rats avoid predation by staying in their runways, being alert, and taking advantage of their cryptic coloration. Their rate of reproduction is high, suggesting that this effort may quickly replace those individuals lost to predation. Hispid cotton rats are preyed on by a wide variety of predators including owls, hawks, red foxes, bobcats, raccoons, coyotes, domestic cats, weasels, mink, and snakes.

Hispid cotton rats presumably fall victim to invasive red fire ants, Solenopsis invicta. Pederson et al., 2003 demonstrated that cotton rat densities in habitats containing fire ants in the summer may be half of that in plots where fire ant suppression techniques have been implemented. This may be a result of habitat switching by cotton rats or direct predation on cotton rat young. In a laboratory study by Ferris (1994) high densities of fire ants caused females to abandon their nests, carrying young in tow one by one for as long as they were able.

Known Predators:

  • fire ants Solenopsis invicta
  • owls (Strigiformes)
  • hawks (Accipitridae)
  • red foxes (Vulpes vulpes)
  • bobcats (Lynx rufus)
  • raccoons (Procyon lotor)
  • weasels (Mustela species)
  • minks (Neovison vison)
  • snakes (Serpentes)
  • coyotes (Canis latrans)
  • house cats (Felis catus)

Anti-predator Adaptations: cryptic

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Reproduction

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Little has been published about the mating systems of hispid cotton rats. Most assumptions about their habits are indirect. For example, hispid cotton rats appear to polygamous because of gender differences in home range sizes. In species where males have a much larger home range than females, polygyny is common.

Mating System: polygynous

Hispid cotton rats have the potential to breed year-round and do so in tropical and semi-tropical portions of their range. In temperate regions breeding seems to be determined by temperature. In Virginia no pregnant females have been reported from November through February. In non-pregnant females heat occurs about every 7 to 9 days. The gestation period is about 27 days. A single adult female typically produces 3 to 4 litters per year, averaging 5 to 7 young per litter. Newborns average 76 mm in total length and 6.5 g. They are usually weaned at about 3 weeks and can be reproductively active in 35 to 40 days. However, most do not reproduce until 2 months and they are fully grown at 5 months.

Breeding interval: Breeding occurs year-round or 3 to 4 times per year, varying by region.

Breeding season: Breeding occurs in summer months in temperate portions of their range and year-round in tropical portions.

Range number of offspring: 1 to 15.

Average number of offspring: 5-7.

Average gestation period: 27 days.

Range weaning age: 5 to 25 days.

Average time to independence: 21 days.

Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female): 2 (low) months.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female): 5 months.

Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male): 2 (low) months.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male): 5 months.

Key Reproductive Features: iteroparous ; seasonal breeding ; year-round breeding ; gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual ; viviparous

Average birth mass: 6.2 g.

Average gestation period: 27 days.

Average number of offspring: 5.

Female hispid cotton rats produce more than one litter per year. The young stay in the nest until they are about 3 weeks old when they are weaned and begin to care for themselves.

Parental Investment: altricial ; female parental care ; pre-fertilization (Provisioning, Protecting: Female); pre-hatching/birth (Provisioning: Female, Protecting: Female); pre-weaning/fledging (Provisioning: Female)

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Meikle, D. and K. Francl 2011. "Sigmodon hispidus" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sigmodon_hispidus.html
author
Dwight Meikle, Radford University
editor
Karen Francl, Radford University
editor
Gail McCormick, Special Projects
editor
Tanya Dewey, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Associated Plant Communities

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the term: cover

Hispid cotton rats occur in mesquite (Prosopis spp.) bosques in Arizona
and New Mexico [41].  On the Coastal Plain hispid cotton rats occupy the
periphery of central ponds and more distant ecotonal areas of
baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) swamps [21].  Hispid cotton rats are
abundant in fallow rice fields in Texas, primarily near heavily
overgrown canalbanks and levees [2].

In Florida hispid cotton rats are common in sabal palm (Sabal
palmetto)-coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) savanna [28].  In the Southeast
hispid cotton rats prefer grassy understories of fire-maintained
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)-shortleaf pine (P. echinata) and longleaf
pine (P. palustris)-slash pine (P. elliottii) stands [34].

In Florida sand pine (P. clausa) scrub has been invaded by hispid cotton
rats for short periods.  Reasons for the invasion were not clear but
were probably related to increased population densities in nearby
optimum habitat (pine flatwoods with a dense ground cover of grasses and
herbs).  Sand pine scrub has little ground cover and is marginal habitat
for hispid cotton rats [66].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Common Names

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
hispid cotton rat
cotton rat
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Conservation Status

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
Information on state- and province-level protection status of animals in the
United States and Canada is available at NatureServe, although recent changes
in status may not be included.
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Cover Requirements

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
On the southern Coastal Plain hispid cotton rats use gopher tortoise
(Gopherus polyphemus) burrows for shelter in sandhill scrub dominated by
longleaf pine, bluejack oak (Quercus incana) and sand post oak (Q.
stellata ssp. margaretta) [35].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Distribution

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
The hispid cotton rat ranges from southern Virginia and North Carolina
west through Tennessee, northern Missouri, Kansas, and extreme southern
Nebraska to southeastern Colorado, New Mexico, and southeastern Arizona;
south to the Gulf Coast; and south to northern South America [20].  It
does not occur on the coastal plain of North Carolina nor in the
mountains of Virginia.  Disjunct populations occur in southeastern
Arizona and extreme southeastern California into Baja California Norte
[63].  It is fairly recent in Kansas, having appeared within the last 50
years [53].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Food Habits

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
Hispid cotton rats are omnivorous, but the major portion of their diet
consists of green vegetation.  They occasionally consume insects and
other small animals [63].  Field observations of hispid cotton rat diet
indicate that preferred foods are the stems, foliage, and seeds of crop
and wild plants [42].  Golley [18] reported that in the Southeast,
perennial legumes and broomsedge comprised a large portion of the diet
of hispid cotton rats.  They also consumed roots and tubers.  In Texas
hispid cotton rat diets always included the lower green stems of grasses
(which are relatively low in nutritive value); raspberries (Rubus spp.),
privet (Ligustrum spp.) fruits, and leaves of fogfruits (Phyla spp.)
were consumed as available [50].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat-related Fire Effects

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, forbs, herbaceous, litter, prescribed fire, seed, shrubs

The response of hispid cotton rats to fire is usually negative in the
very short term, but populations usually recover rapidly with the
recovery of vegetative cover.  Hispid cotton rats have been rated as
fire-negative, since they are associated with plant debris and are
foliage eaters [24], but they are often reported as increasing after
fire.  Bock and Bock [71] reported a decrease in hispid cotton rat
population after combined wildfires and prescribed fire in big sacaton
(Sporobolus wrightii) grasslands reduced big sacaton cover but
stimulated growth of forbs and other grasses.  Hispid cotton rats could
be classified as fire-positive since the lush vegetation produced during
the first few growing seasons following fire often supports relatively
large populations; hispid cotton rat populations are often highest in the
first few growing seasons after fire [22].  In Kansas tallgrass prairie
hispid cotton rats were captured most often in burned lowlands in the
fall following a late winter prescribed fire.  There were also large
numbers of hispid cotton rat in transition areas that had been burned 1
to 3 years before rats were censused.  In lowland areas vegetation on
burned patches was taller and denser than on unburned patches.  On
upland sites there was no significant difference between the number of
captures on unburned and burned sites, but there were slightly more
captures on the unburned site [49].  Ash from prairie fires had no
effect on the palatability of seed in captive feeding trials [51].

In Oklahoma blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica)-post oak (Q. stellata)
savanna, relative densities of hispid cotton rats were greatest on study
plots that were treated with herbicide to reduce shrubs, then burned
annually to maintain grassy cover.  Plots that were untreated succeeded
to dense brush and young trees and had reduced numbers of hispid cotton
rats.  Peak production of hispid cotton rats occurred in the second year
after herbicide treatment, the year of peak herbaceous dicot
productivity.  Hispid cotton rat numbers declined with repeated annual
burning; dicot density also decreased.  This decrease may have been an
important factor in the hispid cotton rat decline since dicots provide
higher quality forage than grass.  However, overall vegetative
productivity declined on the plots over the same time period and may
have been a more important factor than the amount of dicots present
[44].

In the Southeast open pine woodlands with surface cover of broomsedge
and herbs usually have mid-size populations of hispid cotton rats.  The
open condition of these woods is maintained by frequent fire.  Hispid
cotton rat populations peak 3 to 4 years after fire but decline with
longer intervals between fires [29,30].  Komarek [29] concluded that
frequent (annual or biennial) fire keeps hispid cotton rats from
becoming too abundant but also provides better habitat than no fire.  In
southeastern loblolly pine-shortleaf pine stands hispid cotton rats are
the dominant herbivorous rodent the first and second years after fire.
The early brush stage (postfire years 3 and 4) also supports abundant
hispid cotton rats, but hispid cotton rats decline thereafter.  No
hispid cotton rats were reported for plots that had not experienced fire
for 19 years [34].  In Georgia longleaf-slash pine forests that were
burned annually in spring typically supported hispid cotton rat
populations [5].  In north-central Florida pine flatwoods, hispid cotton
rats were not present on burned areas in the first 2 months following
December prescribed fire that burned all surface litter and vegetation.
Hispid cotton rats returned to the burned areas in spring; hispid cotton
rat abundance was greatest in the fall following the prescribed fire.
The first hispid cotton rats to be captured on the burn were subadult
males, but they were followed shortly thereafter by other hispid cotton
rats.  Females on the burn area apparently produced two litters each
during the first postfire growing season [38].

In Georgia fallow fields that had been cultivated for millet were
censused for small mammals before and after prescribed fire.  In March
approximately one-half acre of one of the plots was litter-burned.  Six
pairs of hispid cotton rats were introduced into two 1-acre enclosures
in April; by September there were 70 hispid cotton rats in each
enclosure.  In the first few weeks after the hispid cotton rats were
introduced to the enclosures they concentrated their activity on the
unburned portion of the plot where cover was greatest, but as the season
progressed they moved onto the burned area.  Hispid cotton rats on the
burned area gained slightly more weight than those on the unburned
areas, which suggested that there was more and/or better forage on the
burned areas [48].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Cover Types

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following cover types (as classified by the Society of American Foresters):

    45  Pitch pine
    46  Eastern redcedar
    68  Mesquite
    69  Sand pine
    70  Longleaf pine
    71  Longleaf pine-scrub oak
    73  Southern redcedar
    74  Cabbage palmetto
    75  Shortleaf pine
    76  Shortleaf pine-oak
    78  Virginia pine-oak
    79  Virginia pine
    80  Loblolly pine-shortleaf pine
    81  Loblolly pine
    82  Loblolly pine-hardwood
    83  Longleaf pine-slash pine
    84  Slash pine
    85  Slash pine-hardwood
    97  Atlantic white-cedar
    98  Pond pine
   105  Tropical hardwoods
   110  Black oak
   111  South Florida slash pine
   242  Mesquite
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Ecosystem

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in the following ecosystem types (as named by the U.S. Forest Service in their Forest and Range Ecosystem [FRES] Type classification):

FRES12 Longleaf-slash pine
FRES13 Loblolly-shortleaf pine
FRES14 Oak-pine
FRES15 Oak-hickory
FRES16 Oak-gum-cypress
FRES38 Plains grasslands
FRES39 Prairie
FRES41 Wet grasslands
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Plant Associations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following plant community types (as classified by Küchler 1964):

More info for the term: forest

   K069  Bluestem-grama prairie
   K076  Blackland prairie
   K079  Palmetto prairie
   K081  Oak savanna
   K082  Mosaic of K074 and K100
   K083  Cedar glades
   K084  Cross Timbers
   K088  Fayette prairie
   K089  Black Belt
   K091  Cypress savanna
   K110  Northeastern oak-pine forest
   K111  Oak-hickory-pine forest
   K112  Southern mixed forest
   K113  Southern floodplain forest
   K114  Pocosin
   K115  Sand pine scrub
   K116  Subtropical pine forest
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Habitat: Rangeland Cover Types

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species is known to occur in association with the following Rangeland Cover Types (as classified by the Society for Range Management, SRM):

More info for the term: hardwood

   217  Wetlands
   422  Riparian
   701  Alkali sacaton-tobosagrass
   717  Little bluestem-Indiangrass-Texas wintergrass
   718  Mesquite-grama
   727  Mesquite-buffalograss
   731  Cross timbers-Oklahoma
   732  Cross timbers-Texas (little bluestem-post oak)
   801  Savanna
   802  Missouri prairie
   804  Tall fescue
   808  Sand pine scrub
   809  Mixed hardwood and pine
   810  Longleaf pine-turkey oak hills
   811  South Florida flatwoods
   812  North Florida flatwoods
   813  Cutthroat seeps
   814  Cabbage palm flatwoods
   815  Upland hardwood hammocks
   816  Cabbage palm hammocks
   817  Oak hammocks
   820  Everglades flatwoods
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Management Considerations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the term: litter

The hispid cotton rat is an economic pest in the Southeast where it
causes damage to sweet potato, corn, peanut, tomato, sugar cane, squash,
carrot, and cotton crops.  Hispid cotton rats also take northern
bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) eggs and chicks and sometimes reduce
northern bobwhite productivity [42,47,63].

In old fields abandoned for 3 years in Georgia, hispid cotton rats
consumed up to 2 percent per month of the standing crop of vegetation
when at peak population densities.  Since hispid cotton rats clip more
vegetation than they consume, they also accounted for 10 percent of the
monthly litter input. At lower densities hispid cotton rats are
relatively unimportant in consumption and litter production [36].

Hispid cotton rats are a reservoir for some human diseases including
rabies, Chagas' disease, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis [6].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Occurrence in North America

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals

AL
AZ
AR
CA
CO
FL
GA
KS
LA
MS

MO
NE
NM
NC
OK
SC
TN
TX
VA


MEXICO

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Predators

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the term: presence

Hispid cotton rats are preyed on by many birds and reptiles, and by
other mammals [63].  In Oklahoma hispid cotton rats were a major prey
item in the diet of Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsoni) [3].  In central
Missouri hispid cotton rats comprised 19 percent of prey items in
red-tailed hawk (B. jamaicensis) nests [62].  Hispid cotton rat remains
comprised a substantial portion of short-eared owl (Asio flammeus)
pellets in Arkansas [59].  Hispid cotton rats were the third most
important prey item of red wolves (Canis rufus) in eastern Texas and
Louisiana [56].  In North Carolina bobcats (Lynx rufus) consumed
substantial numbers of hispid cotton rats [72].  Hispid cotton rats were
a minor item in the diet of Florida panthers (Felis concolor coryi)
[40].  In north-central Florida the only direct evidence of predation on
hispid cotton rats was the presence of hispid cotton rat remains in a
barred owl (Strix varia) pellet.  The authors also observed a corn snake
(Elaphe guttata guttata) killing a hispid cotton rat just after the rat
was released from a trap.  The snake apparently had been waiting on the
runway where the trap had been set [38].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Preferred Habitat

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, forbs, grassland, marsh, shrub, shrubs, succession, woodland

Hispid cotton rats occupy a wide variety of habitats within their range
but are not randomly distributed among microhabitats.  They are strongly
associated with grassy patches that have some shrub overstory and they
have little or no affinity for dicot-dominated patches [26,27].  Habitat
use and preference by hispid cotton rats usually appears to depend on
the density of monocots.  However, some studies are equivocal on the
importance of other vegetation [16].  For example, hispid cotton rats
may respond favorably to a high percentage of dicots in a stand if cover
remains optimal.  In Kansas hispid cotton rats increased on root-plowed
prairie that experienced an increase in the diversity and biomass of
early-successional forbs [19].  Also see discussion of Oklahoma savanna
in HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS.

Male hispid cotton rats exhibit a lower degree of habitat selectivity
than females.  In Texas males were found on different habitat types
(grassy, shrubby, and mixed) approximately in proportion to
availability; female hispid cotton rats tended to choose mixed habitats
more often than expected based on availability [7].

Habitat use varies with season and breeding status.  In Texas grassy
areas with some shrubs were preferred in spring and areas with more
shrubby cover were preferred in fall [27].

Grassland Habitats:  In Kansas remnant prairie the preferred habitat of
hispid cotton rats has dense undergrowth and an upper layer of
protective vegetation such as big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii)/kochia
(Kochia scoparia)/annual sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [15].  Hispid
cotton rats prefer grassy clearings, croplands, overgrown fields, and
overgrown roadsides and right-of-ways [42].  In Kansas prairies hispid
cotton rats occur at relatively high abundance in ungrazed uplands and
sandy mixed-grass native prairie, but also prefer disturbed areas.
Kaufman and others [24] suggested that the use of disturbed areas was
probably important in the recent invasion of hispid cotton rats into
north-central Kansas from the northern presettlement limit of their
range in Oklahoma.  On Texas rangelands hispid cotton rats appeared to
respond to increased biomass of standing crop and increases in the
proportion of the standing crop in potential food plants such as
bristlegrasses (Setaria spp.).  Hispid cotton rat density was four times
greater on areas planted to exotic grasses including King Range bluestem
(Bothriochloa ischaemum) and buffel grass (Enchrus ciliaris) than on
native range dominated by windmill grass (Chloris spp.) and Texas
wintergrass (Stipa leucotricha) [19].

Succession in Grasslands:  In northeastern Kansas hispid cotton rats
occurred at high population densities in tallgrass prairie (dominated by
perennial grasses); population density declined to levels too low to
accurately estimate over 28 years of succession to brush and trees [14].
They are occasionally found in habitats dominated by early successional
grassland species (i.e., annual grasses and forbs) [9].

Woodland Habitats:  Hispid cotton rats occur in grassy areas or
early-successional habitats within open woods.  In the Southeast hispid
cotton rat population density increases with the density of broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus) and other low growing plants, but declines with
succession to brush and trees [29].  In Texas pine-hardwood forests,
hispid cotton rats were captured most often in narrow streamside
management zones which have more light and thus more ground cover, and
slightly less often in wider zones [1].  In central Louisiana longleaf
pine-slash pine stands hispid cotton rats were captured in sawtimber,
sapling, and regeneration stands but not in pole-sized timber; stands
with surface cover were more likely to support hispid cotton rats.
Pole-sized timber is dense, little light reaches the ground, and surface
cover is minimal [46].  In Louisiana and Mississippi hispid cotton rats
were more numerous in cut than in uncut bottomland hardwoods.  They were
also more numerous in cottonwood (Populus spp.) plantations than in
uncut cottonwood stands [65].  In northern Georgia intensive site
preparation following clearcutting of pine-hardwood mixtures increases
forage production and increased numbers of small mammals (presumably
including hispid cotton rats) [11].

Importance of Climate:  In Colorado hispid cotton rats occupy semimoist
areas with abundant grasses and weeds and appear to be restricted to
relatively warm areas [39].  In New Mexico hispid cotton rats do not
occur regularly in areas with a mean annual temperature lower than 55
degrees Fahrenheit (13 deg C) and a growing season shorter than 180 days
[45].  In Trans-Pecos Texas hispid cotton rats occur at the warmer, low
elevations in areas of moderate to dense grassy cover [54].

When water and wastewater are added to baldcypress (Taxodium distichum
var. distichum) domes, small mammals including hispid cotton rat move to
peripheral areas that are drier.  The rising water tables favor marsh
rice rats (Oryzomys palustris) over hispid cotton rats [21].

Population Density:  Cameron and McClure [68] compiled reports of hispid
cotton rat population densities.  The mean hispid cotton rat population
density range for all studies was 5.3 to 31.1 rats per hectare.
Population density ranges in Texas include 1 to 14 rats per hectare in
coastal prairie, 17 to 84 rats per hectare in unmowed right-of-ways, 9
to 29 rats per hectare in old fields, 6 to 54 rats per hectare in
abandoned fields, and 0.7 to 5 rats per hectare in grass-prickly-pear
(Opuntia spp.).  In Florida population density ranges include 0 to 24
rats per hectare in sand pine scrub, 2 to 47 rats per hectare in pine
flatwoods, and 27 to 94 rats per hectare in tropical hammock.  In Kansas
hispid cotton rat density ranges were 0.2 to 21 rats per hectare in
grassland [68]; the highest estimated density was 65.4 hispid cotton
rats per hectare in favored habitat [15].

Habitat Patch Size:  In a study of the effects of habitat patchiness on
movement, hispid cotton rats preferred only the largest patches which
were 165 feet by 330 feet (50 x 100 m).  Patches were established by
mowing strips between blocks of grasses.  Hispid cotton rats were
present in intermediate numbers on medium sized patches which were 39.6
feet by 79.2 feet (12 x 24 m), but were so scarce on the smallest patches
that their movement pattern could not be analyzed [10].

Home Range:  In Kansas remnant prairie the average annual home range of
adult male hispid cotton rat was estimated as 0.969 acre (0.39 ha) and
that of adult females as 0.543 acre (0.21 ha).  The greatest distance
traveled by an adult male was 330 feet (100 m) and by an adult female
was 250.9 feet (76.4 m) [15].  In Texas male hispid cotton rats also had
larger home ranges than females.  Home ranges were larger in summer and
winter than in spring and fall.  Home range size was positively
correlated with body mass and negatively correlated with population
density.  There was a relatively high degree of exclusivity (41%),
indicating intolerance of conspecifics, particularly of the same sex
[7].  In Texas hispid cotton rats found their original home ranges
(homed) from displacements of up to 5,000 feet (1,500 m).  Returns were
relatively high from displacements of up to 990 feet (300 m), suggesting
that hispid cotton rats are familiar with the area within that distance.
Hispid cotton rats released in areas with no cover homed better than
hispid cotton rats released in typical hispid cotton rat habitat [8].
Spencer and others [69] used site fidelity as a measure of an
individual's actual home range and concluded that hispid cotton rats
have both single-day and multiday site fidelity and therefore establish
true home ranges.
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Regional Distribution in the Western United States

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info on this topic.

This species can be found in the following regions of the western United States (according to the Bureau of Land Management classification of Physiographic Regions of the western United States):

    7  Lower Basin and Range
   13  Rocky Mountain Piedmont
   14  Great Plains
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Taxonomy

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
The currently accepted scientific name for the hispid cotton rat is
Sigmodon hispidus Say and Ord. It is a member of the family Muridae
subfamily Cricetinae. There are currently 25 accepted subspecies
including the type subspecies [20].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Timing of Major Life History Events

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, litter, presence

Diurnal and Annual Activity:  Some studies have suggested that hispid
cotton rats are mainly nocturnal, but activity has been observed at all
hours.  Activity patterns appear to be influenced by both biotic and
abiotic factors.  Hispid cotton rats are active year-round [6].

Breeding Season:  Hispid cotton rat populations usually exhibit a
bimodal breeding season, with peak litter production occurring in late
spring and in late summer-early fall [6].  Rose [67] reported
reproductive peaks in March and June for hispid cotton rats; 100 percent
of trapped females were pregnant from March through July, but none were
breeding in November and December.  They do not breed in the coldest
winter months.  In Kansas breeding is restricted to the frost-free
months [6].

Nest Building:  A nest is constructed by the female either on the ground
surface or in a burrow.  Nests are cup- to ball-shaped and woven of
grasses [6].  Hispid cotton rats in the northern parts of their range
make nests that are thicker and denser, but not larger, than those of
southern hispid cotton rats [58].

Gestation and Development of Young:  Gestation in hispid cotton rats
lasts approximately 27 days.  Litter sizes range from 1 to 15 young,
with larger litters more typical of northern populations and also of
late-season litters.  Neonates are well developed; they are mobile and
lightly furred but the eyes are not open.  The eyes open approximately
18 to 36 hours after birth.  Hispid cotton rats are weaned in 10 to 15
days and reach minimum adult size by about 41 days [7,68].

Productivity:  Some male hispid cotton rats are sexually mature by 60
days, some females are receptive by 30 to 40 days.  The earliest
recorded pregnancy was at 38 days [7,68].  Hispid cotton rats have been
noted as one of the most prolific mammals in the Southeast.  Females
bear two to several litters per year depending on latitude and local
weather [63].  Females mate within 24 hours of giving birth [6].

Longevity:  In Kansas remnant prairie very few hispid cotton rats were
recaptured after 8 months [15].

Population Fluctuation:  Hispid cotton rat populations are largely
sedentary; population density depends mainly on current reproductive
effort and not as strongly on immigration [29].  In Kansas remnant
prairie hispid cotton rat population density was highest in fall and
early winter and lowest in spring and early summer [15].  In the
northernmost parts of hispid cotton rat range, severe weather is
associated with rapid hispid cotton rat population declines and local
extinctions [43].  In Kansas most hispid cotton rat mortality was
associated with severe weather in March and April.  Populations in the
northern part of hispid cotton rat range experience dramatic declines in
the nonbreeding season.  In many areas local extinction is frequent
[52].  In Georgia hispid cotton rat spring abundance in old fields was
lowest following drought and extreme winter cold.  The reductions in
hispid cotton rat populations were associated with sharp declines in
vegetative biomass and cover [37].

Effects of Predation:  In Georgia a density of 15 hispid cotton rats per
acre was considered the predator-limited carrying capacity.  Mammalian
predators did not have a substantial effect on hispid cotton rat
population density.  At densities higher than 15 per acre mortality was
high; below 15 hispid cotton rats per acre predator-caused mortality was
low [55].  Schnell [55] concluded that when diverse and mobile predators
are present they are more important than food, social interaction, or
weather in limiting hispid cotton rat density. 

Also in Georgia, 1-acre field enclosures protected from avian predators
(covered with a net) were monitored for the effect of avian predators on
breeding hispid cotton rat populations.  The presence of the cover had
no effect on seasonal recruitment or spring-summer mortality; however,
autumn-winter mortality was greatly reduced with the cover in place.  It
was therefore suggested that avian predators are more important than
mammalian predators.  In addition, it was concluded that nonbreeding
(winter) populations suffer substantial losses from predation whereas
breeding populations are either able to compensate by replacing lost
individuals, are less vulnerable to predation, or both [64].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Use of Fire in Population Management

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: fire regime, grassland, herbaceous, prescribed fire

Komarek [29] stated that northern bobwhite management areas could be
kept from becoming overrun with hispid cotton rats through the use of
frequent (annual to biennial) prescribed fire in fall or spring.  This
management technique maintains northern bobwhite habitat and reduces
hispid cotton rat habitat to some extent.  Longer fire-free intervals
are more detrimental to northern bobwhite populations than is predation
by hispid cotton rats [29,30].


An extensive body of research has been published on fire effects on animals
in semidesert grassland, oak savanna, and Madrean oak woodlands of southeastern
Arizona, including the response of hispid cotton rats to fire. See the Research Project Summary of this work for more information on
hispid cotton rats and more than 100 additional species of small mammals,
birds, grasshoppers, and herbaceous and woody plant species.

FIRE REGIMES :
Find fire regime information for the plant communities in which this
species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under
"Find FIRE REGIMES".
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Sullivan, Janet. 1995. Sigmodon hispidus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/

Hispid cotton rat

provided by wikipedia EN

The hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) is a rodent species long thought to occur in parts of South America, Central America, and southern North America. However, recent taxonomic revisions, based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data, have split this widely distributed species into three separate species (S. hispidus, S. toltecus, and S. hirsutus). The distribution of S. hispidus ranges from Arizona in the west to Virginia to the east and from the Platte River in Nebraska in the north to, likely, the Rio Grande in the south, where it meets the northern edge of the distribution of S. toltecus (formerly S. h. toltecus).[2] Adult size is total length 202–340 mm (8.0–13.4 in); tail 87–122 mm (3.4–4.8 in), frequently broken or stubbed; hind foot 29–35 mm (1.1–1.4 in); ear 16–20 mm (0.63–0.79 in); mass 50–250 g (1.8–8.8 oz).[3] They have been used as laboratory animals.[4]

Taxonomy

The currently accepted scientific name for the hispid cotton rat is Sigmodon hispidus. It is a member of the family Cricetidae.[5] Although 25 subspecies are accepted, including the type subspecies,[6] the most distinct genetic subdivision within S. hispidus separates the species into two genetic lineages, an eastern one and a western one, which hybridize along a contact zone.[7]

Distribution

In the United States, the hispid cotton rat ranges from southern Virginia and North Carolina (especially the coastal plain) west through Tennessee, northern Missouri, Kansas, and extreme southern Nebraska to southeastern Colorado, New Mexico, and southeastern Arizona; south to the Gulf Coast; and south to northern Mexico.[6] It does not occur on the coastal plain of North Carolina nor in the mountains of Virginia. Disjunct populations occur in southeastern Arizona and extreme southeastern California into Baja California Norte.[8] In Kansas, it appeared within the last 50 years.[9]

Habitat

Hispid cotton rats occupy a wide variety of habitats within their range, but are not randomly distributed among microhabitats. They are strongly associated with grassy patches with some shrub overstory and they have little or no affinity for dicot-dominated patches.[10][11] Habitat use and preference by hispid cotton rats usually appear to depend on the density of monocots. However, some studies are equivocal on the importance of other vegetation.[12] For example, hispid cotton rats may respond favorably to a high percentage of dicots in a stand if cover remains optimal. In Kansas, hispid cotton rats increased on root-plowed prairie that experienced an increase in the diversity and biomass of early successional forbs.[13]

Male hispid cotton rats exhibit a lower degree of habitat selectivity than females. In Texas, males were found on different habitat types (grassy, shrubby, and mixed) about in proportion to availability; females tended to choose mixed habitats more often than expected based on availability.[14] Habitat use varies with season and breeding status. In Texas, grassy areas with some shrubs were preferred in spring and areas with more shrubby cover were preferred in fall.[11]

In Kansas, remnant prairie the preferred habitat of hispid cotton rats has dense undergrowth and an upper layer of protective vegetation such as big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii)/kochia (Kochia scoparia)/annual sunflower (Helianthus annuus).[15] Hispid cotton rats prefer grassy clearings, croplands, overgrown fields, and overgrown roadsides and right-of-ways.[16] In Kansas prairies hispid cotton rats occur at relatively high abundance in ungrazed uplands and sandy mixed-grass native prairie, but also prefer disturbed areas.

The use of disturbed areas was probably important in the recent invasion of hispid cotton rats into north-central Kansas from the northern presettlement limit of their range in Oklahoma.[17] On Texas rangelands, hispid cotton rats appeared to respond to increased biomass of standing crop and increases in the proportion of the standing crop in potential food plants such as bristlegrasses (Setaria spp.). Rat density was four times greater on areas planted to exotic grasses including King Range bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum) and buffel grass (Enchrus ciliaris) than on native range dominated by windmill grass (Chloris spp.) and Texas wintergrass (Stipa leucotricha).[13]

In northeastern Kansas, hispid cotton rats occurred at high population densities in tallgrass prairie (dominated by perennial grasses); population density declined to levels too low to accurately estimate over 28 years of succession to brush and trees.[18] They are occasionally found in habitats dominated by early successional grassland species (i.e., annual grasses and forbs).[19]

Hispid cotton rats occur in grassy areas or early-successional habitats within open woods. In the Southeast hispid cotton rat population density increases with the density of broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus) and other low growing plants, but declines with succession to brush and trees.[20] In Texas pine-hardwood forests, hispid cotton rats were captured most often in narrow streamside management zones which have more light and thus more ground cover, and slightly less often in wider zones.[21] In longleaf pine-slash pine stands of central Louisiana hispid cotton rats were captured in sawtimber, sapling, and regeneration stands but not in pole-sized timber; stands with surface cover were more likely to support hispid cotton rats. Pole-sized timber is dense, little light reaches the ground, and surface cover is minimal.[22] In Louisiana and Mississippi, hispid cotton rats were more numerous in cut than in uncut bottomland hardwoods. They were also more numerous in cottonwood (Populus spp.) plantations than in uncut cottonwood stands.[23] In northern Georgia intensive site preparation following clearcutting of pine-hardwood mixtures increases forage production and increased numbers of small mammals (presumably including hispid cotton rats).[24]

In Colorado, hispid cotton rats occupy semimoist areas with abundant grasses and weeds and appear to be restricted to relatively warm areas.[25] In New Mexico, hispid cotton rats do not occur regularly in areas with a mean annual temperature lower than 55 degrees Fahrenheit (13 °C) and a growing season shorter than 180 days.[26] In Trans-Pecos, Texas, hispid cotton rats occur at the warmer, low elevations in areas of moderate to dense grassy cover.[27]

When water and wastewater are added to baldcypress (Taxodium distichum var. distichum) domes, small mammals including hispid cotton rat move to peripheral areas that are drier. The rising water tables favor marsh rice rats (Oryzomys palustris) over hispid cotton rats.[28]

Cameron and McClure [29] compiled reports of hispid cotton rat population densities. The mean hispid cotton rat population density range for all studies was 5.3 to 31.1 rats per hectare. Population density ranges in Texas include 1 to 14 rats per hectare in coastal prairie, 17 to 84 rats per hectare in unmowed right-of-ways, 9 to 29 rats per hectare in old fields, 6 to 54 rats per hectare in abandoned fields, and 0.7 to 5 rats per hectare in grass-prickly-pear (Opuntia spp.). In Florida population density ranges include 0 to 24 rats per hectare in sand pine scrub, 2 to 47 rats per hectare in pine flatwoods, and 27 to 94 rats per hectare in tropical hammock. In Kansas, the hispid cotton rat density ranged from 0.2 to 21 rats per hectare in grassland;[29] the highest estimated density was 65.4 hispid cotton rats per hectare in favored habitat.[15]

In a study of the effects of habitat patchiness on movement, hispid cotton rats preferred only the largest patches which were 165 feet (50 m) by 330 feet (50×100 m). Patches were established by mowing strips between blocks of grasses. Hispid cotton rats were present in intermediate numbers on medium-sized patches which were 39.6 by 79.2 feet (12.1 by 24.1 metres), but were so scarce on the smallest patches that their movement pattern could not be analyzed.[30]

In Kansas remnant prairie, the average annual home range of adult male hispid cotton rat was estimated as 0.969 acres (0.392 hectares) and that of adult females as 0.543 acres (0.220 hectares). The greatest distance traveled by an adult male was 330 feet (100 m) and by an adult female was 250.9 feet (76.5 m).[15] In Texas male hispid cotton rats also had larger home ranges than females. Home ranges were larger in summer and winter than in spring and fall. Home range size was positively correlated with body mass and negatively correlated with population density. There was a relatively high degree of exclusivity (41%), indicating intolerance of conspecifics, particularly of the same sex.[14] In Texas hispid cotton rats found their original home ranges (homed) from displacements of up to 5,000 feet (1,500 m). Returns were relatively high from displacements of up to 990 feet (300 m), suggesting that hispid cotton rats are familiar with the area within that distance. Hispid cotton rats released in areas with no cover homed better than hispid cotton rats released in typical hispid cotton rat habitat.[31] Spencer and others [32] used site fidelity as a measure of an individual's actual home range and concluded that hispid cotton rats have both single-day and multiday site fidelity and therefore establish true home ranges.

Cover requirements

On the southern Coastal Plain, hispid cotton rats use gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows for shelter in sandhill scrub dominated by longleaf pine, bluejack oak (Quercus incana) and sand post oak (Q. stellata ssp. margaretta).[33]

Plant communities

Hispid cotton rats occur in mesquite (Prosopis spp.) bosques in Arizona and New Mexico.[34] On the Coastal Plain, hispid cotton rats occupy the periphery of central ponds and more distant ecotonal areas of bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) swamps.[28] Hispid cotton rats are abundant in fallow rice fields in Texas, primarily near heavily overgrown canal banks and levees.[35]

In Florida, hispid cotton rats are common in sabal palm (Sabal palmetto)-coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) savanna.[36] In the Southeast, hispid cotton rats prefer grassy understories of fire-maintained loblolly pine-shortleaf pine (Pinus taeda-P. echinata) and longleaf pine-slash pine (P. palustris-P. elliottii) stands.[37]

In Florida, sand pine (P. clausa) scrub has been invaded by hispid cotton rats for short periods. Reasons for the invasion were not clear, but were probably related to increased population densities in nearby optimum habitat (pine flatwoods with a dense ground cover of grasses and herbs). Sand pine scrub has little ground cover and is marginal habitat for hispid cotton rats.[38]

Behavior and biology

Hispid cotton rats are mainly nocturnal, but activity has been observed at all hours. Activity patterns appear to be influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors. They are active year-round.[39] Populations usually exhibit a bimodal breeding season, with peak litter production occurring in late spring and late summer-early fall.[39] Reproductive peaks in March and June for hispid cotton rats;[40] all trapped females were pregnant from March through July, but none was breeding in November and December. They do not breed in the coldest winter months. In Kansas, breeding is restricted to the frost-free months.[39]

A nest is constructed by the female either on the ground surface or in a burrow. Nests are cup- to ball-shaped and woven of grasses.[39] Hispid cotton rats in the northern parts of their range make thicker and denser nests, but not larger, than those of southern hispid cotton rats.[41]

Gestation in hispid cotton rats lasts about 27 days. Litter sizes range from one to 15 young, with larger litters more typical of northern populations and also of late-season litters. Neonates are well developed; they are mobile and lightly furred, but their eyes are not open. The eyes open around 18 to 36 hours after birth. They are weaned in 10 to 15 days and reach minimum adult size by about 41 days.[14][29]

Some male hispid cotton rats are sexually mature by 60 days; some females are receptive by 30 to 40 days. The earliest recorded pregnancy was at 38 days.[14][29] These rats have been noted as one of the most prolific mammals in the Southeast. Females bear two to several litters per year depending on latitude and local weather.[8] Females mate within 24 hours of giving birth.[39]

Hispid cotton rat populations are largely sedentary; population density depends mainly on current reproductive effort and not as strongly on immigration.[20] In Kansas remnant prairie, hispid cotton rat population density was highest in fall and early winter and lowest in spring and early summer.[15] In the northernmost parts of hispid cotton rat range, severe weather is associated with rapid population declines and local extinctions.[42] In Kansas, most mortality was associated with severe weather in March and April. Populations in the northern part of hispid cotton rat range experience dramatic declines in the nonbreeding season. In many areas, local extinction is frequent.[43] In Georgia, their spring abundance in old fields was lowest following drought and extreme winter cold. The reductions in populations were associated with sharp declines in vegetative biomass and cover.[44]

In Georgia, a density of 15 hispid cotton rats per acre was considered the predator-limited carrying capacity. Mammalian predators did not have a substantial effect on population density. At densities higher than 15 per acre, mortality was high; below 15 rats per acre, predator-caused mortality was low.[45] When diverse and mobile predators are present, they are more important than food, social interaction, or weather in limiting hispid cotton rat density.[45] Also in Georgia, 1-acre (4,000 m2) field enclosures protected from avian predators (covered with a net) were monitored for the effect of avian predators on breeding hispid cotton rat populations. The presence of the cover had no effect on seasonal recruitment or spring-summer mortality; however, autumn-winter mortality was greatly reduced with the cover in place. Avian predators, then, are apparently more important than mammalian predators. In addition, nonbreeding (winter) populations suffer substantial losses from predation, whereas breeding populations are either able to compensate by replacing lost individuals, are less vulnerable to predation, or both.[46]

Diet

Hispid cotton rats are omnivorous, but the major portion of their diet consists of green vegetation. They occasionally consume insects and other small animals.[8] Field observations of hispid cotton rat diet indicate that preferred foods are the stems, foliage, and seeds of crop and wild plants.[16] Golley[47] reported that in the Southeast, perennial legumes and broomsedge comprised a large portion of the diet of hispid cotton rats. They also consumed roots and tubers. In Texas hispid cotton rat diets always included the lower green stems of grasses (which are relatively low in nutritive value); raspberries (Rubus spp.), privet (Ligustrum spp.) fruits, and leaves of fogfruits (Phyla spp.) were consumed as available.[48]

Predators

Hispid cotton rats are preyed on by many birds and reptiles, and by other mammals.[8] In Oklahoma hispid cotton rats were a major prey item in the diet of Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsoni).[49] In central Missouri hispid cotton rats comprised 19% of prey items in red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) nests.[50] Hispid cotton rat remains comprised a substantial portion of short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) pellets in Arkansas.[51] Hispid cotton rats were the third most important prey item of red wolves (Canis rufus) in eastern Texas and Louisiana.[52] In North Carolina, bobcats (Lynx rufus) consumed substantial numbers of hispid cotton rats.[53] Hispid cotton rats were a minor item in the diet of Florida panthers (Felis concolor coryi).[54] In north-central Florida the only direct evidence of predation on hispid cotton rats was the presence of hispid cotton rat remains in a barred owl (Strix varia) pellet. The authors also observed a corn snake (Elaphe guttata guttata) killing a hispid cotton rat just after the rat was released from a trap. The snake apparently had been waiting on the runway where the trap had been set.[55]

References

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from Sigmodon hispidus. United States Department of Agriculture.

  1. ^ Cassola, F. (2017) [errata version of 2016 assessment]. "Sigmodon hispidus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016: e.T20213A115157685. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T20213A22356086.en. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  2. ^ Carroll, D. S., L. L. Peppers, and R. D. Bradley. (2004). "Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Sigmodon hispidus species group". pp. 85–98, in Contribuciones Mastozoologicas en Homenaje a Bernardo Villa (Sanchez-Cordero V. y R. A. Medellin Eds.) Instituto de Biologia e Instituto de Ecologia, UNAM, Mexico.
  3. ^ "Hispid Cotton Rat Sigmodon hispidus (Say and Ord)". New World Mice And Rats (Family Cricetidae). University of Kansas Field Station. Retrieved 21 April 2013.
  4. ^ Mittal, S. K.; Middleton, D. M.; Tikoo, S. K.; Prevec, L.; Graham, F. L.; Babiuk, L. A. (1996). "Pathology and immunogenicity in the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) model after infection with a bovine adenovirus type 3 recombinant virus expressing the firefly luciferase gene". Journal of General Virology. 77 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-77-1-1. PMID 8558115.
  5. ^ Meikle, D. and Powers, K. (2011) Sigmodon hispidus hispid cotton rat. Animal Diversity Web, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
  6. ^ a b Hall, E. Raymond. (1981). The mammals of North America. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons
  7. ^ Phillips, C. D.; C. A. Henard; R. S. Pfau (2007). "Amplified fragment length polymorphism and mitochondrial DNA analyses reveal patterns of divergence and hybridization in the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)". Journal of Mammalogy. 88 (2): 351–359. doi:10.1644/06-MAMM-A-089R1.1.
  8. ^ a b c d Whitaker, John O., Jr. (1980). National Audubon Society field guide to North American mammals. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0394507622
  9. ^ Sauer, John R.; Slade, Norman A. (1985). "Mass-based demography of a hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) population". Journal of Mammalogy. 66 (2): 316–328. doi:10.2307/1381244. JSTOR 1381244.
  10. ^ Kincaid, W. Bradley; Cameron, Guy N. (1985). "Interactions of cotton rats with a patchy environment: dietary responses and habitat selection". Ecology. 66 (6): 1769–1783. doi:10.2307/2937373. JSTOR 2937373.
  11. ^ a b Kincaid, W. Bradley; Cameron, Guy N.; Carnes, Bruce A. (1983). "Patterns of habitat utilization in sympatric rodents on the Texas coastal prairie". Ecology. 64 (6): 1471–1480. doi:10.2307/1937502. JSTOR 1937502.
  12. ^ Fleharty, Eugene D.; Mares, Michael A. (1973). "Habitat preference and spatial relations of Sigmodon hispidus on a remnant prairie in west-central Kansas". The Southwestern Naturalist. 18 (1): 21–29. doi:10.2307/3669907. JSTOR 3669907.
  13. ^ a b Guthery, Fred S.; Anderson, Terry E.; Lehmann, Valgene W. (1979). "Range rehabilitation enhances cotton rats in South Texas". Journal of Range Management. 32 (5): 354–356. doi:10.2307/3898014. hdl:10150/646559. JSTOR 3898014.
  14. ^ a b c d Cameron, Guy N.; Spencer, Stephen R. (1985). "Assessment of space-use patterns in the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)". Oecologia. 68 (1): 133–139. Bibcode:1985Oecol..68..133C. doi:10.1007/BF00379485. JSTOR 4217808. PMID 28310922. S2CID 23297480.
  15. ^ a b c d Fleharty, Eugene D. (1972). "Some aspects of small mammal ecology in a Kansas remnant prairie". In: Zimmerman, James H., ed. Proceedings, 2nd Midwest prairie conference; 1970 September 18–20; Madison, WI. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Arboretum. pp. 97–103
  16. ^ a b Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. (1951). American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
  17. ^ Kaufman, Donald W.; Finck, Elmer J.; Kaufman, Glennis A. (1990). "Small mammals and grassland fires". In: Collins, Scott L.; Wallace, Linda L., eds. Fire in North American tallgrass prairies. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 46–80
  18. ^ Fitch, Henry S.; Kettle, W. Dean. (1983). "Ecological succession in vegetation and small mammal populations on a natural area of northeastern Kansas". In: Kucera, Clair L., ed. Proceedings, 7th North American prairie conference; 1980 August 4–6; Springfield, MO. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. pp. 117–121
  19. ^ Dickson, James G.; Williamson, J. Howard. (1988). Small mammals in streamside management zones in pine plantations. In: Szaro, Robert C.; Severson, Kieth E.; Patton, David R., technical coordinators. Management of amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals in North America: Proceedings of the symposium; 1988 July 19–21; Flagstaff, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-166. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. pp. 375–378
  20. ^ a b Komarek, E. V. (1939). "A progress report on southeastern mammal studies". Journal of Mammalogy. 20 (3): 292–299. doi:10.2307/1374251. JSTOR 1374251.
  21. ^ Atkeson, Thomas D.; Johnson, A. Sydney (1979). "Succession of small mammals on pine plantations in the Georgia Piedmont". The American Midland Naturalist. 101 (2): 385–392. doi:10.2307/2424604. JSTOR 2424604.
  22. ^ Mullin, Keith; Williams, Kenneth L. (1987). "Mammals of longleaf-slash pine stands in central Louisiana". In: Pearson, Henry A.; Smeins, Fred E.; Thill, Ronald E., compilers. Proceedings of the southern evaluation project workshop; 1987 May 26–27; Long Beach, MS. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-68. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. pp. 121–124
  23. ^ Wigley, T. Bently; Roberts, Thomas H. (1994). "A review of wildlife changes in southern bottomland hardwoods due to forest management practices". Wetlands. 14 (1): 41–48. doi:10.1007/BF03160620. S2CID 6244643.
  24. ^ Evans, Timothy L.; Waldrop, Thomas A.; Guynn, David C., Jr. (1991). "Fell-and-burn regeneration in the North Georgia piedmont: effects on wildlife habitat and small mammals". Proceedings, Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 45: 104–114
  25. ^ Lechleitner, R. R. (1969). Wild mammals of Colorado. Boulder, CO: Pruett Publishing Company
  26. ^ Mohlhenrich, John S. (1961). "Distribution and ecology of the hispid and least cotton rats in New Mexico". Journal of Mammalogy. 42 (1): 13–24. doi:10.2307/1377236. JSTOR 1377236.
  27. ^ Schmidly, David J. (1977). The mammals of Trans-Pecos Texas: including Big Bend National Park and Guadalupe Mountains National Park. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University
  28. ^ a b Harris, Larry D.; Vickers, Charles R. (1984). "Some faunal community characteristics of cypress ponds and the changes induced by perturbations". In: Ewel, Katherine Carter; Odum, Howard T., eds. Cypress swamps. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press. pp. 171–185. ISBN 9780813007144
  29. ^ a b c d Cameron, Guy N.; McClure, Polley A. (1988). "Geographic variation in life history traits of the Hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)". In: Boyce, Mark S., ed. Evolution of life histories of mammals: theory and pattern. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press: 33–64
  30. ^ Diffendorfer, James E.; Gaines, Michael S.; Holt, Robert D. (1995). "Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus, and Peromyscus)". Ecology. 76 (3): 827–839. doi:10.2307/1939348. JSTOR 1939348.
  31. ^ DeBusk, Joan; Kennerly, Thomas E. Jr. (1975). "Homing in the cotton rat, Sigmodon hispidus Say and Ord". The American Midland Naturalist. 93 (1): 149–157. doi:10.2307/2424113. JSTOR 2424113.
  32. ^ Spencer, Stephen R.; Cameron, Guy N.; Swihart, Robert K. (1990). "Operationally defining home range: temporal dependence exhibited by hispid cotton rats". Ecology. 71 (5): 1817–1822. doi:10.2307/1937590. JSTOR 1937590.
  33. ^ Landers, J. Larry; Speake, Dan W. (1980). "Management needs of sandhill reptiles in southern Georgia". Proceedings, Annual Conference of Southeast Association Fish & Wildlife Agencies. 34: 515–529
  34. ^ Mares, M. A.; Hulse, A. C. (1977). "Patterns of some vertebrate communities in creosote bush deserts". In: Mabry, T. J.; Hunziker, J. H.; DiFeo, D. R., Jr., eds. Creosote bush: Biology and chemistry of Larrea in New World deserts. U.S./IBP Synthesis Series 6. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc. pp. 209–226. ISBN 0879332824
  35. ^ Baker, R. H. (14 May 1940). "Effect of Burning and Grazing on Rodent Populations". Journal of Mammalogy. 21 (2): 223. doi:10.1093/jmammal/21.2.223.
  36. ^ Klukas, Richard W. (1969). The Australian pine problem in Everglades National Park. Part 1. The problem and some solutions. Internal Report. South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park. 16 p. On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT
  37. ^ Landers, J. Larry. (1987). Prescribed burning for managing wildlife in southeastern pine forests. In: Dickson, James G.; Maughan, O. Eugene, eds. Managing southern forests for wildlife and fish: a proceedings; Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-65. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 19–27
  38. ^ Stout, I. Jack; Demmer, Richard J. (1982). "Cotton rat invasion of sand pine scrub habitat". Journal of Mammalogy. 63 (2): 236–242. doi:10.2307/1380632. JSTOR 1380632.
  39. ^ a b c d e Cameron, Guy N.; Spencer, Stephen R. (1981). "Sigmodon hispidus" (PDF). Mammalian Species (158): 1–9. doi:10.2307/3504057. JSTOR 3504057. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2005.
  40. ^ Rose, Robert K. (1986). "Reproductive strategies of meadow voles, hispid cotton rats, and eastern harvest mice in Virginia". Virginia Journal of Science. 37 (4): 230–239.
  41. ^ Shump, Karl A. Jr. (1978). "Ecological importance of nest construction in the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)". The American Midland Naturalist. 100 (1): 103–115. doi:10.2307/2424781. JSTOR 2424781.
  42. ^ McClenaghan, Leroy R. Jr.; Gaines, Michael S. (1978). "Reproduction in marginal populations of the Hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) in northeastern Kansas". Papers of the Kansas University Museum of Natural History. 74: 1–16.
  43. ^ Sauer, John R. (1985). "Mortality associated with severe weather in a northern population of cotton rats". The American Midland Naturalist. 113 (1): 188–189. doi:10.2307/2425360. JSTOR 2425360.
  44. ^ Langley, Albert K. Jr.; Shure, Donald J. (1988). "The impact of climatic extremes on cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) populations". The American Midland Naturalist. 120 (1): 136–143. doi:10.2307/2425893. JSTOR 2425893.
  45. ^ a b Schnell, Jay H. (1968). "The limiting effects of natural predation on experimental cotton rat populations". Journal of Wildlife Management. 32 (4): 698–711. doi:10.2307/3799543. JSTOR 3799543.
  46. ^ Wiegert, Richard G. (1972). "Population dynamics of cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) and meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in field enclosures in South Carolina". Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Science. 30: 103–110.
  47. ^ Golley, Frank B. (1962). The mammals of Georgia: a study of their distribution and functional role in the ecosystem. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. ISBN 9780608157948
  48. ^ Randolph, J. C.; Cameron, Guy N.; Wrazen, John A. (1991). "Dietary choice of a generalist grassland herbivore, Sigmodon hispidus". Journal of Mammalogy. 72 (2): 300–313. doi:10.2307/1382100. JSTOR 1382100.
  49. ^ Bednarz, James C. (1988). "Swainson's hawk". In: Glinski, Richard L.; Pendleton, Beth Giron; Moss, Mary Beth et al., eds. Proceedings of the southwest raptor management symposium and workshop; 1986 May 21–24; Tucson, AZ. NWF Scientific and Technical Series No. 11. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 87–96
  50. ^ Toland, Brian R. (1990). "Nesting ecology of red-tailed hawks in central Missouri". Transactions, Missouri Academy of Science. 24: 1–16.
  51. ^ Smith, Ronald A.; Hanebrink, Earl L. (1982). "Analysis of regurgitated short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) pellets from the Roth Prairie, Arkansas County, Arkansas". Arkansas Academy of Science Proceedings. 36: 106–108.
  52. ^ Shaw, James Harlan. (1975). Ecology, behavior, and systematics of the red wolf (Canis rufus). New Haven, CT: Yale University. Dissertation
  53. ^ Miller, S. Douglas; Speake, Dan W. (1978). "Prey utilization by bobcats on quail plantations in southern Alabama". Proceedings, Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 32: 100–111
  54. ^ Maehr, David S.; Belden, Robert C.; Land, E. Darrell; Wilkins, Laurie (1990). "Food habits of panthers in southwest Florida". Journal of Wildlife Management. 54 (3): 420–423. doi:10.2307/3809651. JSTOR 3809651.
  55. ^ Layne, James N. (1974). "Ecology of small mammals in a flatwoods habitat in north-central Florida, with emphasis on the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)". American Museum Novitates: No. 2544. New York: The American Museum of Natural History. hdl:2246/5445
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Hispid cotton rat: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) is a rodent species long thought to occur in parts of South America, Central America, and southern North America. However, recent taxonomic revisions, based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data, have split this widely distributed species into three separate species (S. hispidus, S. toltecus, and S. hirsutus). The distribution of S. hispidus ranges from Arizona in the west to Virginia to the east and from the Platte River in Nebraska in the north to, likely, the Rio Grande in the south, where it meets the northern edge of the distribution of S. toltecus (formerly S. h. toltecus). Adult size is total length 202–340 mm (8.0–13.4 in); tail 87–122 mm (3.4–4.8 in), frequently broken or stubbed; hind foot 29–35 mm (1.1–1.4 in); ear 16–20 mm (0.63–0.79 in); mass 50–250 g (1.8–8.8 oz). They have been used as laboratory animals.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN